Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Giant iceberg, four times the size of Manhattan, breaks free from Antarctica

TECH

Giant iceberg, four times the size of Manhattan, breaks free from Antarctica
TECH

TECH

Giant iceberg, four times the size of Manhattan, breaks free from Antarctica

2017-10-04 12:22 Last Updated At:10-05 02:07

A huge piece of ice, four times the size of Manhattan, seperated from West Antarctia. This is the second time in two years a massive iceberg calved from the continent's Pine Island Glacier. 

Photo via NASA by Nathan Kurtz

Photo via NASA by Nathan Kurtz

Photo via Twitter

Photo via Twitter

The latest break-off measured 103 sq miles (267 sq km) was found after the release of an iceberg the size of Delaware from Antarctica's Larsen C ice shelf in July. 

More Images
Photo via NASA by Nathan Kurtz

A huge piece of ice, four times the size of Manhattan, seperated from West Antarctia. This is the second time in two years a massive iceberg calved from the continent's Pine Island Glacier.

Photo via Twitter

Photo via Twitter

Photo via Twitter

The latest break-off measured 103 sq miles (267 sq km) was found after the release of an iceberg the size of Delaware from Antarctica's Larsen C ice shelf in July.

Photo via NASA Earth Observation

Experts said warming water around the continent may be the reason causing the break-off. And the new calving can worsen the situation making loss of more ice from the area.

The scientists said, generally, ice chunks won't directly raise sea level. They explained the situation is like the ice cubes in a glass of water, when the ice cubes melt, the water level doesn't change.

Photo via NASA Earth Observatory

Photo via NASA Earth Observatory

Satellite-observation specialist Stef Lhermitte posted a few photos of the glacier and compared the splits over years.

Photo via Twitter

Photo via Twitter

Experts said warming water around the continent may be the reason causing the break-off. And the new calving can worsen the situation making loss of more ice from the area.

They added this is unusual while most of the time, icebergs break free form glaciers around edges and this may be the result of warming sea waters melting the ice from below.

Photo via NASA Earth Observation

Photo via NASA Earth Observation

The scientists said, generally, ice chunks won't directly raise sea level. They explained the situation is like the ice cubes in a glass of water, when the ice cubes melt, the water level doesn't change. 

However, the new floating shelves do raises global sea levels.  It is estimated that Pine Island Glacier could raise sea levels by 1.7 feet (0.5 metres) if allowed to completely melt. 

Another iceberg, named A68 broke free previously in late July, is moving to North and leaving behind a 2,246 sq miles (5,818 sq km) area of seabed exposed.

Photo via NASA Earth Observatory

Photo via NASA Earth Observatory

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Russia and Ukraine on Monday traded blame before the United Nations Security Council for the attacks on Europe’s largest nuclear power plant, which the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said have put the world “dangerously close to a nuclear accident.”

Without attributing blame, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said his agency has been able to confirm three attacks against the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant since April 7.

“These reckless attacks must cease immediately,” he told the Security Council. “Though, fortunately, they have not led to a radiological incident this time, they significantly increase the risk … where nuclear safety is already compromised.”

The remote-controlled nature of the drones that have attacked the plant means that it is impossible to definitively determine who launched them, Grossi told reporters after the meeting.

“In order to say something like that, we must have proof,” he said. “These attacks have been performed with a multitude of drones.”

Zaporizhzhia sits in Russian-controlled territory in southeastern Ukraine and has six nuclear reactors.

Fears of a nuclear catastrophe have been at the forefront since Russian troops occupied the plant shortly after invading in February 2022. Continued fighting between Russian and Ukrainian forces — as well as the tense supply situation at the plant — have raised the specter of a disaster.

Ukraine and its allies on Monday again blamed Russia for dangers at the site, with the United States saying, “Russia does not care about these risks.”

“If it did, it would not continue to forcibly control the plant,” U.S. deputy ambassador Robert Wood told the Security Council, which met at the initiative of the U.S. and Slovenia.

Russia, for its part, said Ukraine was to blame for the attacks.

“The IAEA’s report does not pinpoint which side is behind the attacks,” Russia’s U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said. “We know full well who it is.”

“Over the last few months, such attacks not only resumed,” Nebenzia said, “they significantly intensified.”

Ukraine’s ambassador to the U.N., Sergiy Kyslytsya, called the attacks “a well-planned false flag operation by the Russian Federation,” which he alleged Russia had designed to distract the world from its invasion of its neighbor.

The Zaporizhzhia facility is one of the 10 biggest nuclear plants in the world. Fighting in the southern part of Ukraine where it is located has raised the specter of a potential nuclear disaster like the one at Chernobyl in 1986, where a reactor exploded and blew deadly radiation across a vast area.

Neither Russia nor Ukraine in recent months has been able to make significant advances along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line crossing eastern and southern Ukraine. Drones, artillery and missiles have featured heavily in what has become a war of attrition.

Russia and Ukraine have frequently traded accusations over the Zaporizhzhia plant.

The most recent strikes did not compromise the facility, which is designed to withstand a commercial airliner crashing into it, the IAEA said.

The plant’s six reactors have been shut down for months, but it still needs power and qualified staff to operate crucial cooling systems and other safety features.

FILE - The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Europe's largest, is seen in the background of the shallow Kakhovka Reservoir after the dam collapse, in Energodar, Russian-occupied Ukraine, Tuesday, June 27, 2023. Officials at the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant said that the site was attacked Sunday April 7, 2024, by Ukrainian military drones, including a strike on the dome of the plant’s sixth power unit. (AP Photo/Libkos, File)

FILE - The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Europe's largest, is seen in the background of the shallow Kakhovka Reservoir after the dam collapse, in Energodar, Russian-occupied Ukraine, Tuesday, June 27, 2023. Officials at the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant said that the site was attacked Sunday April 7, 2024, by Ukrainian military drones, including a strike on the dome of the plant’s sixth power unit. (AP Photo/Libkos, File)

IAEA warns that attacks on a nuclear plant in Russian-controlled Ukraine put the world at risk

IAEA warns that attacks on a nuclear plant in Russian-controlled Ukraine put the world at risk

IAEA warns that attacks on a nuclear plant in Russian-controlled Ukraine put the world at risk

IAEA warns that attacks on a nuclear plant in Russian-controlled Ukraine put the world at risk

Recommended Articles