China's competition in the field of electric vehicles is in line with the trend of the times and technological development, according to Zhu Min, Vice-Chairman of China Center for International Economic Exchanges, adding that the "overcapacity" allegation against China is totally untenable and goes against the trend of Zeitgeist.
During talks with China Central Television (CCTV), Zhu noted that the "overcapacity" claim is basically a protectionist viewpoint that aims to stifle the development of China's new energy vehicle industry.
"These viewpoints [Western claims] reflect a protectionist mindset, and a rather insular one. They held that if you establish factories with more advanced technology in my country, you will snatch my country's employment opportunities, and therefore I cannot let you enter. This perspective is very obsolete. China welcomes enterprises from around the world. The competition in the field of electric vehicles is forward-looking, inclusive, and in line with the trend of the times and technological development, which is in conformity with the global pursuit of carbon neutrality. It's untenable and cliche to accuse China of 'overcapacity'," Zhu said.
Zhu also slammed the "overcapacity" narrative from the economics principles.
"First, for instance, for government subsidies, most of China's new energy vehicle manufactures are privately-owned, and there are obviously no government subsidies available to them. Second, for the issue of dumping, it usually means selling products in overseas markets at much cheaper prices than in domestic markets. Another indicator is to see if the sales of electric vehicles in foreign markets are larger than that in the domestic market. However, China's sales in foreign markets are far less than in the domestic market, for China boasts tremendous domestic market. Therefore, from the perspective of the fundamental economics principles, the claims of 'overcapacity' and dumping are totally untenable," he said.