Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Key takeaways: Should Democrats go big or get real?

News

Key takeaways: Should Democrats go big or get real?
News

News

Key takeaways: Should Democrats go big or get real?

2019-07-31 11:33 Last Updated At:11:40

Should Democrats be going big or getting real? That's the question that dominated Tuesday's Democratic primary debate, as progressive favorites Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders fended off attacks from lesser-known moderates. The display amounted to a sometimes testy public airing of the party's anxieties about how far left is too left and how to beat President Donald Trump. Here are the key takeaways from the debate:

EVOLUTION VS. REVOLUTION

The battle lines were clear from the opening remarks. This was the pragmatists against the front-runners seeking transformational change.

Over and over, moderate candidates like Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper and former Rep. John Delaney argued Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders' plans — from Medicare for All to the Green New Deal — are unrealistic and would scare off voters.

Bullock bemoaned the candidates' "wish-list economics." Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar dismissed free college — even for wealthy families — as unworkable and touted her ideas "grounded in reality."

Hickenlooper called for "an evolution, not a revolution" on health care.

The attacks weren't shocking in a debate that featured the progressive standouts Warren and Sanders onstage with a handful of lesser-known moderates looking to seize the spotlight. But the two senators' unified front in fighting them off was notable. Though they are jockeying for some of the same voters, Warren and Sanders didn't bother going after each other. They largely beat back the moderate critique of their call for sweeping, systemic change with similar arguments.

Sanders argued his health plan is "not radical" and achievable. Warren said the country's problems can't be solved with "small ideas and spinelessness."

PLAYING INTO TRUMP'S HANDS?

Donald Trump loomed large over the Democratic debate stage. Repeatedly, the candidates mixed their policy plans with political strategy — arguing over whether their party's leftward push will only open them up to GOP criticism.

On topics from Medicare for All to immigration, Warren and Sanders found themselves under attack as their more moderate competitors told them their policies only played into Trump's hands.

The notion of taking away private insurance from millions and a Green New Deal that "makes sure that every American's guaranteed a government job that they want" is "a disaster at the ballot box," Hickenlooper said.

"You might as well FedEx the election to Donald Trump," Hickenlooper said. Delaney wondered, "Why do we have to be so extreme?" Even self-help author Marianne Williamson chimed in to say she does "have concern about what the Republicans would say."

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg tried to end the unusually public display of anxiety, declaring, "it is time to stop worrying about what the Republicans will say."

"If it's true that if we embrace a far left agenda they're going to say we're a bunch of crazy socialists," Buttigieg said. "If we embrace a conservative agenda, you know what they're going to do? They're going to say we're a bunch of crazy socialists. So let's just stand up for the right policy, go out there, and defend it."

MEDICARE FOR ALL TAKES HEAT

If the fight was between centrists and progressives, Medicare for All was the weapon.

The early moments of the debate was dominated by a fight over whether Sanders' plan to eliminate private insurance in favor of a universal government health plan is possible, practical or political suicide.

At times, with Medicare for All supporters Sanders and Warren outnumbered, the centrists piled on, raising doubts about the quality of care it could offer, the costs and the disruption to the health care system. Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan called it "bad policy and bad politics." Bullock said he couldn't support a plan that "rips away" insurance from Americans who have it.

"It used to be Republicans who wanted to do repeal and replace," Bullock said, referring to the Republican refrain on getting rid of President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act.

Sanders, who has spent much of his career on the issue, grew agitated as he defended the plan. The coverage would actually be better, he argued.

"You don't know that, Bernie," Ryan interjected.

"I do know," Sanders fired back. "I wrote the damn bill!"

UNITED AGAINST TRUMP ON RACE

For all the divisions onstage Tuesday, the candidates were unified in rebuking Trump's racist comments and using race as a campaign theme.

Trump in recent weeks has told four congresswomen of color to "go back" to the countries they came from and criticized Rep. Elijah Cummings' Baltimore-area district as a "rat and rodent infested mess."

"I have had it with the racist attacks," Klobuchar said in her opening statement.

Sanders said Trump exploited racism. Warren said, "The president is advancing environmental racism, economic racism, criminal justice racism, health care racism." Warren won strong applause from the Detroit audience when she declared her administration would treat white supremacy as a form of domestic terrorism.

Buttigieg also directed criticism at members of Congress he said are supportive of or silent on "naked racism" in the White House.

"If you are a Republican member of Congress, consider the fact that when the sun sets on your career, and they are writing your story of all the good and bad things you did in your life, the thing you will be remembered for is whether in this moment, with this president, you found the courage to stand up to him or you continued to put party over country," he said. It was one of the loudest applause lines of the night.

Associated Press writer Hunter Woodall contributed from Detroit.

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — Venezuela’s parliament on Tuesday approved a measure that criminalizes a broad range of activities that can hinder navigation and commerce in the South American country, such as the seizure of oil tankers.

The bill — introduced, debated and approved within two days in the National Assembly — follows this month's seizures by U.S. forces of two tankers carrying Venezuelan oil in international waters. The seizures are the latest strategy in U.S. President Donald Trump's four-month pressure campaign on Venezuela's leader Nicolás Maduro.

The tankers are part of what the Trump administration has said is a fleet Venezuela uses to evade U.S. economic sanctions.

The unicameral assembly, which is controlled by Venezuela's ruling party, did not publish drafts on Tuesday nor the final version of the measure. But as read on the floor, the bill calls for fines and prison sentences of up to 20 years for anyone who promotes, requests, supports, finances or participates in “acts of piracy, blockades or other international illegal acts” against commercial entities operating with the South American country.

Venezuela's political opposition, including Nobel Peace laureate María Corina Machado, has expressed support for Trump's Venezuela policy, including the seizure of tankers. Machado and Trump have both repeatedly said that Maduro's days in power are numbered.

The bill, which now awaits Maduro’s signature, also instructs the executive branch to come up with “incentives and mechanisms for economic, commercial and other protections” for national or foreign entities doing business with Venezuela in the event of piracy activities, a maritime blockade or other unlawful acts.

The U.S. Coast Guard on Saturday seized a Panama-flagged vessel called Centuries that officials said was part of the fleet moving sanctioned cargo. With assistance from the U.S. Navy, it seized a rogue tanker called Skipper on Dec. 10. That ship was registered in Panama.

Trump, after that first seizure, said the U.S. would carry out a “blockade” of Venezuela. He later demanded that Venezuela return assets that it seized from U.S. oil companies years ago, justifying anew his announcement of the blockade against sanctioned oil tankers traveling to or from the South American country.

At an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council called by Venezuela, U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz on Tuesday stressed that sanctioned oil tankers “operate as the primary economic lifeline for Maduro and his illegitimate regime.”

“Maduro’s ability to sell Venezuela’s oil enables his fraudulent claim to power and his narco-terrorist activities,” Waltz said. “The United States will impose and enforce sanctions to the maximum extent to deprive Maduro of the resources he uses to fund Cartel de los Soles.”

Maduro was indicted in 2020 on narcoterrorism charges in the U.S. and accused of leading the Cartel de los Soles, which the Trump administration designated as a foreign terrorist organization last month. But the entity is not a cartel per se.

Venezuelans began using the term Cartel de los Soles in the 1990s to refer to high-ranking military officers who had grown rich from drug-running. As corruption expanded nationwide, its use loosely expanded to police and government officials as well as activities like illegal mining and fuel trafficking.

At Tuesday's meeting, Venezuela’s U.N. Ambassador Samuel Moncada accused the U.S. of acting “outside international law” and its own domestic laws, by demanding that Venezuelans vacate the country and hand it over to the Trump administration, including all its oil fields.

“What right does the United States government have to appropriate, to date, almost 4 million barrels of Venezuelan oil?” Moncada asked, referring to the cargo of the two seized tankers. “This alleged naval blockade is essentially a military act aimed at laying siege to the Venezuelan nation, degrading its economic and military apparatus, weakening its social and political cohesion, and causing internal chaos to facilitate aggression by external forces.”

Many countries expressed concern about violations of international maritime law and adhering to the United Nations Charter, which requires all 193 member nations to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of every other country. The United States’ actions were supported by a few countries, including Panama and Argentina.

Associated Press writer Edith Lederer in New York contributed to this report.

Lawmaker Giuseppe Alessandrello gives a speech during an extraordinary session at the National Assembly in Caracas, Venezuela, Monday, Dec. 22, 2025. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

Lawmaker Giuseppe Alessandrello gives a speech during an extraordinary session at the National Assembly in Caracas, Venezuela, Monday, Dec. 22, 2025. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

Evana, an oil tanker, is docked at El Palito port in Puerto Cabello, Venezuela, Sunday, Dec. 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

Evana, an oil tanker, is docked at El Palito port in Puerto Cabello, Venezuela, Sunday, Dec. 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

Recommended Articles