Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

New York City wrestles with surge of violent police clashes

News

New York City wrestles with surge of violent police clashes
News

News

New York City wrestles with surge of violent police clashes

2019-11-11 00:56 Last Updated At:01:00

A surge in violent police clashes has left a trail of bodies across New York City, stoking tensions between officers and critics who say they have been too quick to use deadly force.

Since mid-October, New York Police Department officers have shot five people, killing four of them — a torrent that left department veterans struggling to recall another time there were so many on-duty shootings in the city in such a short span.

On Oct. 23, police killed a man in Harlem after they say he fired a gunshot that hit an officer's bullet-resistant vest. Two days later, police killed a man in Brooklyn after they say he slammed an officer's head with a chair. That officer was placed in a medically induced coma for several days.

FILE - This Oct. 23, 2019 file photo provided by the New York Police Department shows a firearm recovered at the scene where police shot and killed a suspect in New York. A police officer, also shot during the incident, was in stable condition and is expected to survive. He was shot in the chest but was wearing a bullet-proof vest. A surge in violent police clashes in recent weeks has left a trail of bodies across the city and stoked tensions between officers and critics who say they have been too quick to use deadly force. (New York Police Department via AP, File)

FILE - This Oct. 23, 2019 file photo provided by the New York Police Department shows a firearm recovered at the scene where police shot and killed a suspect in New York. A police officer, also shot during the incident, was in stable condition and is expected to survive. He was shot in the chest but was wearing a bullet-proof vest. A surge in violent police clashes in recent weeks has left a trail of bodies across the city and stoked tensions between officers and critics who say they have been too quick to use deadly force. (New York Police Department via AP, File)

Adding to the chasm: bystander video that showed a white police officer punching a black teen during a brawl on a Brooklyn subway platform. Hundreds of people last weekend marched in protest and the family of one teen said it will sue.

Why the sudden uptick in confrontations between police and the public? It depends on who you ask.

In law enforcement circles, there's a growing feeling that people are feeling emboldened to act out against police officers. In a series of attacks over the summer, several officers were soaked with water , others were hit with a milk carton and Chinese food and another had his body camera ripped off.

In this Oct. 24, 2019 file photo, Deputy Chief Kevin Maloney speaks during a news conference at police headquarters in New York. The NYPD says it has confirmed that an officer who was saved by his bulletproof vest was hit by a suspect's bullet, during a confrontation with the apparently emotionally disturbed man early Oct. 23 at a Harlem apartment building. At right is First Deputy Police Commissioner Benjamin Tucker. A surge in violent police clashes in recent weeks has left a trail of bodies across the city and stoked tensions between officers and critics who say they have been too quick to use deadly force. (AP PhotoRichard Drew, File)

In this Oct. 24, 2019 file photo, Deputy Chief Kevin Maloney speaks during a news conference at police headquarters in New York. The NYPD says it has confirmed that an officer who was saved by his bulletproof vest was hit by a suspect's bullet, during a confrontation with the apparently emotionally disturbed man early Oct. 23 at a Harlem apartment building. At right is First Deputy Police Commissioner Benjamin Tucker. A surge in violent police clashes in recent weeks has left a trail of bodies across the city and stoked tensions between officers and critics who say they have been too quick to use deadly force. (AP PhotoRichard Drew, File)

Police unions say frequent criticism of police from city politicians and reform advocates is stoking anti-police sentiment.

The city's largest police union, the Police Benevolent Association, says a lack of support from police leaders has left officers feeling isolated and abandoned, exemplified by the decision in August to fire an officer in the 2014 chokehold death of Eric Garner.

And the unions say reluctance by some judges and prosecutors to put suspects in jail, coupled with criminal justice reforms, such as the elimination of bail for most non-violent felonies on Jan. 1, will make it harder for officers to keep the streets and themselves safe.

"The message is that there are no consequences for your actions," said Joseph Giacalone, a former NYPD sergeant who now teaches at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

"You're a victim and you're a victim of society and you're a victim of racism. And the police are the enemy because they are the tool they use to oppress you. That's basically the message that has been filtered down."

Reform advocates see it differently.

They argue the police have been provoking some of the recent flashes of violence with aggressive tactics, such as arresting people for jumping subway turnstiles and running down people suspected of carrying guns.

Public defender and police critic Rebecca Kavanagh pointed to the Sept. 29 friendly fire death of Officer Brian Mulkeen, which she said would not have happened had officers not chased a man who ran away when they approached him.

Mulkeen, part of an anti-crime unit tasked with removing guns from the streets, was wrestling with the man, 27-year-old Antonio Williams, and could be heard on body-camera footage yelling, "He's reaching for it! He's reaching for it!" before his fellow officers opened fire.

Joo-Hyun Kang, the director of Communities United for Police Reform, said laws keeping disciplinary files secret and the outsized power of the NYPD and unions are enabling police officers to use deadly force with little or no consequence.

"Police violence isn't new, but abusive and violent policing is out of control in New York City," said Kang, the director of the watchdog group, which advocated for the firing of all officers in Garner's death.

Police officials noted that some of the people shot by officers had criminal records or prior police interactions, but Kavanagh said those details can work to demonize a person and make it seem like shooting them was justified.

The recent string of officer-involved violence began with an Oct. 15 shooting outside a Brooklyn public housing complex that police reform advocates and the slain man's family say happened under murky circumstances.

The police department said 30-year-old Nasheem Prioleau was killed after pointing a gun and possibly firing at a pair of anti-crime officers who saw him shooting at another person and had ordered him to drop the weapon.

However, Kavanagh said it was later determined that a 9mm pistol found at the scene was not fired, and the person Prioleau was purportedly shooting at has never been found.

"The night Nasheem Prioleau was killed, there was definitely a gun battle, because people including myself heard the gunfire all over Brooklyn," Kavanagh said. "Turns out it was just from one side — the police."

Four hours later, officers in the Bronx shot a man suspected of firing a gun at subway station. He was hit in the shoulder and taken to a hospital for treatment.

Of the men shot by New York City police officers in recent weeks, police said three had guns.

Another, a driver pulled over in the Bronx for not wearing a seat belt, was shot on Oct. 17 after police said he shifted his car into gear and began moving it back and forth, endangering officers. Police said they found drugs in his car, but no gun.

"It's like when police engage someone in a high-speed chase for driving with a suspended license, putting so many other people's lives at risk," Kavanagh said. "It doesn't make any sense."

And then there was the man with the chair, who was killed on Oct. 25 after police said he ran into a nail salon in Brooklyn's Brownsville neighborhood and attacked Officer Lesly Lafontant. The man's family said they had been seeking mental health treatment on his behalf.

"Policing is a difficult job, and that's nothing new," said Dermot Shea, who will take over as police commissioner on Dec. 1. "Let me let me be firm: We have zero tolerance for any attacks on our officers."

Follow Sisak at twitter.com/mikesisak

Next Article

TikTok may be banned in the US. Here's what happened when India did it

2024-04-24 20:52 Last Updated At:21:00

NEW DELHI (AP) — The hugely popular Chinese app TikTok may be forced out of the U.S., where a measure to outlaw the video-sharing app has won congressional approval and is on its way to President Biden for his signature.

In India, the app was banned nearly four years ago. Here's what happened:

In June 2020, TikTok users in India bid goodbye to the app, which is operated by Chinese internet firm ByteDance. New Delhi had suddenly banned the popular app, alongside dozens other Chinese apps, following a military clash along the India-China border. Twenty Indian and four Chinese soldiers were killed, and ties between the two Asian giants plunged to a new low.

The government cited privacy concerns and said that Chinese apps pose a threat to India’s sovereignty and security.

The move mostly drew widespread support in India, where protesters had been calling for a boycott of Chinese goods since the deadly confrontation in the remote Karakoram mountain border region.

“There was a clamour leading up to this, and the popular narrative was how can we allow Chinese companies to do business in India when we’re in the middle of a military standoff,” said Nikhil Pahwa, a digital policy expert and founder of tech website MediaNama.

Just months before the ban, India had also restricted investment from Chinese companies, Pahwa added. “TikTok wasn’t a one-off case. Today, India has banned over 500 Chinese apps to date.”

At the time, India had about 200 million TikTok users, the most outside of China. And the company also employed thousands of Indians.

TikTok users and content creators, however, needed a place to go — and the ban provided a multi-billion dollar opportunity to snatch up a big market. Within months, Google rolled out YouTube Shorts and Instagram pushed out its Reels feature. Both mimicked the short-form video creation that TikTok had excelled at.

“And they ended up capturing most of the market that TikTok had vacated,” said Pahwa.

In India, TikTok content was hyperlocal, which made it quite unique. It opened a window into the lives of small-town India, with videos coming from tier 2 and 3 cities that showed people doing tricks while laying down bricks, for example.

But for the most part, content creators and users in the four years since the ban have moved on to other platforms.

Winnie Sangma misses posting videos on TikTok and earning a bit of money. But after the ban, he migrated to Instagram and now has 15,000 followers. The process, for the most part, has been relatively painless.

“I have built up followers on Instagram too, and I am making money from it, but the experience isn’t like how it used to be on TikTok,” he said.

Rajib Dutta, a frequent scroller on TikTok, also switched to Instagram after the ban. “It wasn’t really a big deal,” he said.

The legislation to outlaw the app has won congressional approval and now awaits a signature from Biden.

The measure gives ByteDance, the app’s parent company, nine months to sell it, and three more if a sale is underway. If this doesn’t happen, TikTok will be banned. It would take at least a year before a ban goes into effect, but with likely court challenges, it could stretch longer.

In India, the ban in 2020 was swift. TikTok and other companies were given time to respond to questions on privacy and security, and by January 2021, it became a permanent ban.

But the situation in the U.S. is different, said Pahwa. “In India, TikTok decided not to go to court, but the U.S. is a bigger revenue market for them. Also, the First Amendment in America is fairly strong, so it’s not going to be as easy for the U.S. to do this as it was for India,” he said, in reference to free speech rights in the U.S. Constitution.

As Chinese apps proliferate across the world, Pahwa says countries need to assess their dependency on China and develop a way to reduce it as the apps can pose a national security risk.

The app is also banned in Pakistan, Nepal and Afghanistan and restricted in many countries in Europe.

“Chinese intelligence law and its cybersecurity law can allow Chinese apps to work in the interest of their own security. That creates a situation of distrust and it becomes a national security risk for others,” said Pahwa.

“There should be different rules for democratic countries and for authoritarian regimes where companies can act as an extension of the state,” he added.

—-

This story corrects the expert's erroneous reference to Fourth instead of First Amendment.

FILE- Activists of Jammu and Kashmir Dogra Front shout slogans against Chinese President Xi Jinping next to a banner showing the logos of TikTok and other Chinese apps banned in India during a protest in Jammu, India, July 1, 2020. (AP Photo/Channi Anand, File)

FILE- Activists of Jammu and Kashmir Dogra Front shout slogans against Chinese President Xi Jinping next to a banner showing the logos of TikTok and other Chinese apps banned in India during a protest in Jammu, India, July 1, 2020. (AP Photo/Channi Anand, File)

Recommended Articles