Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

A's face tight schedule to get agreements and financing in place to open Las Vegas stadium on time

News

A's face tight schedule to get agreements and financing in place to open Las Vegas stadium on time
News

News

A's face tight schedule to get agreements and financing in place to open Las Vegas stadium on time

2024-05-24 06:28 Last Updated At:06:32

LAS VEGAS (AP) — The Oakland Athletics are on a tight schedule to get agreements in place and demonstrate that financing is set for construction to begin on time for the team's new stadium in Las Vegas.

The A's hope to open the approximately $1.5 million, 33,000-seat ballpark for the 2028 season.

This is the A's final season in Oakland. They agreed to play the following three seasons, with an option for a fourth, in a Triple-A stadium in West Sacramento, California.

Steve Hill, president and CEO of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, said the timelines will be met.

“They're coming and they've said they can finance this stadium,” Hill said. “They are going to play baseball here in 2028. I frankly think it's just fun (for critics) to create some drama around it and that's happening. That keeps all of our lives a little more interesting, but it doesn't change the facts on the ground, which is they've said what they're going to do and they're just doing it.”

Attempts to reach A’s officials for comment were unsuccessful.

Managing partner Brendan Bussmann of B Global, an international consulting firm based in Las Vegas, said ideally ground would be broken on the Strip-located stadium by March 1 for the A's to play there in 2028.

Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred said Thursday at an owners meeting that construction needed to begin by April to ensure a 2028 opening. Hill said the A's themselves have provided that timeline, and he noted Allegiant Stadium — home to the NFL's Las Vegas Raiders — was built in 31 months.

“You think you could probably get the ballpark built in a very similar period of time,” Hill said. “It's obviously a little bit smaller structure.”

He said starting later than April didn't necessarily mean the opening date would be pushed back, saying construction could be done in double shifts and on weekends.

Two key documents still need to be approved by the Las Vegas Stadium Authority Board, which Hill chairs.

One is the non-relocation agreement, which was introduced last week. That agreement, expected to be for a term of 30 years, could be approved in the authority's planned July meeting.

The likely most critical piece is the development agreement. That will lay out the financing to supplement the $380 million in public funding approved by the Democratic-controlled Nevada Legislature in a special session last June and signed by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo.

Hill said he wasn't concerned whether A's owner John Fisher can provide the roughly $1.1 billion of financing on his end. The A's have hired New York-based Galatioto Sports Partners to help find investors.

“I think John's looking at options,” Hill said. “I don't think it's necessarily out of need. I think it's to make sure that the funding is the most efficient for the A's.”

Would Fisher be willing to fund the stadium without investors?

“He has the ability to do that, yeah,” Hill said.

Bussmann said the A's have not laid out enough of a financing plan to assuage the public's concerns whether the money will be there.

“This is where the A’s need to put forward, ’Here’s our plan and this is what we need to stick to,'” Bussmann said.

He said if the A's aren't transparent, criticism of whether a financing plan will be achieved will dog the organization throughout the process of building a stadium.

Hill, however, pushed back on the notion the club wasn't properly communicating its plans. He said there haven't been as many public meetings as when the then-Oakland Raiders went through the process of building Allegiant Stadium, which was completed in 2020, because that was all new for Las Vegas officials.

“We've got a template that's in place,” Hill said. “(It) helps with these documents and helps simply list all the issues that might come up. So both sides are doing the work and it's getting done and we're on track and we don't see any reason why that won't continue.”

Manfred said the A's don't have time pressure to put their financing in place.

“I don’t think that John has a necessity of effectuating any of that in order to meet this deadline,” Manfred said. “That could happen before or after. And there’s actually a play there, right, when you sell (equity), the closer you get, the more it looks like reality, the more it’s worth.”

Manfred also said the 2025 major league and Triple-A schedules are being constructed to allow the A’s and River Cats to both use the ballpark in West Sacramento.

The authority and the A's had a legal victory May 13 when the Nevada Supreme Court ruled against a proposed ballot initiative that would've put public funding for the stadium up for a vote this year. Now the Schools over Stadiums political action committee said it would attempt to do so again in 2026, but that likely would be too late to prevent the stadium from going up.

"If it’s on the 2026 ballot, that’s 18 months into construction,” Bussmann said.

Another PAC, Strong Public Schools Nevada, which is backed by the Nevada State Education Association, filed a lawsuit in February challenging whether the money allocated by the Legislature violates the state constitution.

Hill did not comment specifically on those two legal challenges, but said he was confident in the end the stadium will open when scheduled.

Bussmann, for all his concerns about what still needs to be accomplished, didn't necessarily disagree.

“You’re on the clock at this point,” he said. “They have 10-plus months to get this done. What needs to happen at this point in time is doable.”

The A's also are focusing on what needs to be accomplished in Sacramento, and Manfred said the club is building a separate clubhouse and renovating the visiting one. Other upgrades are being made, as well, including club seating, video boards and new artificial turf.

“So there’s a lot going on there to get it up to snuff for the interim period,” Manfred said.

More than 13,000 fans have expressed interest in tickets in Sacramento, an A's spokesperson said.

AP Baseball Writer Ronald Blum in New York contributed to this report.

AP MLB: https://apnews.com/hub/mlb

Oakland Athletics' Shea Langeliers, Michael Kelly, Esteury Ruiz, J.D. Davis and Abraham Toro, from left, celebrate after the team's 8-1 win over the Seattle Mariners in a baseball game Saturday, May 11, 2024, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Jason Redmond)

Oakland Athletics' Shea Langeliers, Michael Kelly, Esteury Ruiz, J.D. Davis and Abraham Toro, from left, celebrate after the team's 8-1 win over the Seattle Mariners in a baseball game Saturday, May 11, 2024, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Jason Redmond)

FILE - The Oakland Athletics and their design teams released renderings Tuesday, March 5, 2024 of the club's planned $1.5 billion stadium in Las Vegas that show five overlapping layers with a similar look to the famous Sydney Opera House. The Athletics are on a tight schedule to get agreements in place and demonstrate financing is in place for construction to begin on time for the A’s to play in their new Las Vegas stadium. The A’s hope to open the approximately $1.5 million, 33,000-seat ballpark in time for the 2028 season. (Negativ via AP, File)

FILE - The Oakland Athletics and their design teams released renderings Tuesday, March 5, 2024 of the club's planned $1.5 billion stadium in Las Vegas that show five overlapping layers with a similar look to the famous Sydney Opera House. The Athletics are on a tight schedule to get agreements in place and demonstrate financing is in place for construction to begin on time for the A’s to play in their new Las Vegas stadium. The A’s hope to open the approximately $1.5 million, 33,000-seat ballpark in time for the 2028 season. (Negativ via AP, File)

FILE - The Oakland Athletics and their design teams released renderings Tuesday, March 5, 2024 of the club's planned $1.5 billion stadium in Las Vegas that show five overlapping layers with a similar look to the famous Sydney Opera House. The Athletics are on a tight schedule to get agreements in place and demonstrate financing is in place for construction to begin on time for the A’s to play in their new Las Vegas stadium. The A’s hope to open the approximately $1.5 million, 33,000-seat ballpark in time for the 2028 season. (Negativ via AP, File)

FILE - The Oakland Athletics and their design teams released renderings Tuesday, March 5, 2024 of the club's planned $1.5 billion stadium in Las Vegas that show five overlapping layers with a similar look to the famous Sydney Opera House. The Athletics are on a tight schedule to get agreements in place and demonstrate financing is in place for construction to begin on time for the A’s to play in their new Las Vegas stadium. The A’s hope to open the approximately $1.5 million, 33,000-seat ballpark in time for the 2028 season. (Negativ via AP, File)

FILE - The Oakland Athletics and their design teams released renderings Tuesday, March 5, 2024 of the club's planned $1.5 billion stadium in Las Vegas that show five overlapping layers with a similar look to the famous Sydney Opera House. The Athletics are on a tight schedule to get agreements in place and demonstrate financing is in place for construction to begin on time for the A’s to play in their new Las Vegas stadium. The A’s hope to open the approximately $1.5 million, 33,000-seat ballpark in time for the 2028 season. (Negativ via AP, File)

FILE - The Oakland Athletics and their design teams released renderings Tuesday, March 5, 2024 of the club's planned $1.5 billion stadium in Las Vegas that show five overlapping layers with a similar look to the famous Sydney Opera House. The Athletics are on a tight schedule to get agreements in place and demonstrate financing is in place for construction to begin on time for the A’s to play in their new Las Vegas stadium. The A’s hope to open the approximately $1.5 million, 33,000-seat ballpark in time for the 2028 season. (Negativ via AP, File)

Next Article

Arizona judge rejects GOP wording for voters' abortion ballot initiative pamphlet

2024-07-27 09:07 Last Updated At:09:10

PHOENIX (AP) — A judge on Friday rejected an effort by GOP lawmakers to use the term “unborn human being” to refer to a fetus in the pamphlet that Arizona voters will use to weigh a ballot measure that would expand abortion access in the state.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Christopher Whitten said the wording the legislative council suggested is “packed with emotion and partisan meaning” and asked for what he called more “neutral” language. The measure aims to expand abortion access from 15 weeks to 24 weeks – the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb.

It would allow exemptions to save the woman’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. It would also prevent the state from adopting or enforcing laws that would forbid access to the procedure.

Arizona House Speaker Ben Toma, who is a co-chair of the legislative council, said the group will appeal the court’s decision to the state Supreme Court.

“The ruling is just plain wrong and clearly partisan,” said Toma, a Republican.

The State Supreme Court has until Aug. 27 to rule on the appeal for the language to be changed.

Aaron Thacker, communications director for Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, noted that the final decision on the ballot itself remains in the air.

“There’s still a lot of scenarios at play," he said. "Even after the secretary certifies the signatures, the courts have to decide if counties can put it on the ballot or not."

Arizona for Abortion Access, the organization leading the ballot measure campaign, sued the council earlier this month over the suggested language and advocated for the term “fetus,” which the council rejected.

Attorney General Kris Mayes wrote in a motion to submit an amicus brief that “fetus" and “pregnancy” are both neutral terms that the council could adopt.

“It’s incredibly important to us that Arizona voters get to learn more about and weigh our measure in objective and accurate terminology,” said Dawn Penich, communications director for the abortion access group.

Democrats have centered abortion rights in their campaigns in this year’s elections. Organizers in five other states have also proposed similar measures that would codify abortion access in their state constitutions: Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Nevada and South Dakota.

Arizona organizers submitted more than double the amount of signatures needed for the measure to appear on the ballot.

FILE - Arizona abortion-rights supporters deliver over 800,000 petition signatures to the capitol to get abortion rights on the November general election ballot July 3, 2024, in Phoenix. A judge on Friday, July 26, rejected an effort by GOP lawmakers to use the term “unborn human being” to refer to a fetus in the pamphlet that Arizona voters will use to decide on a ballot measure that would expand abortion access in the state. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)

FILE - Arizona abortion-rights supporters deliver over 800,000 petition signatures to the capitol to get abortion rights on the November general election ballot July 3, 2024, in Phoenix. A judge on Friday, July 26, rejected an effort by GOP lawmakers to use the term “unborn human being” to refer to a fetus in the pamphlet that Arizona voters will use to decide on a ballot measure that would expand abortion access in the state. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)

Recommended Articles