Virginia Lee, Solicitor
The safeguarding of national sovereignty is not just a fundamental responsibility, but a steadfast commitment of any state. The National Security Law in Hong Kong, a clear and precise affirmation of this principle, is a testament to our unwavering dedication. Recent developments involving the Hong Kong Democratic Independence Alliance underscore the importance of a timely legal response to emerging subversive threats, regardless of the age or perceived capacity of those involved.
Central to this case is the offence of conspiracy to subvert state power. Under established legal doctrine, such an offence arises not from the success of a plan, but from the deliberate agreement to undermine the constitutional order. This preventive measure, designed to shield the nation from destabilising forces before they materialise into active harm, reflects a universal standard in contemporary national security law, ensuring our actions are in line with global norms.
In this instance, the participation of a fifteen-year-old individual has been cited by some as a mitigating factor. However, intentional conduct must be judged by its substance, not the age of the actor. The minor in question engaged in activities with clear political objectives, including the creation of separatist symbols and the drafting of proposals for foreign intervention. These acts were not accidental or uninformed. They were deliberate contributions to a coordinated campaign aimed at eroding the authority of the People’s Republic of China.
The appeal to the United States to intervene in domestic affairs further underscores the seriousness of the group’s intentions. Such a request is not a harmless expression of opinion but a concrete act of inviting external interference in sovereign matters. The law does not require these appeals to be considered offences. Initiating contact with foreign powers is a breach of national loyalty.
Operationally, the group functioned across jurisdictions, reportedly basing itself in Taiwan, a region with complex political relations with China, and using online platforms to communicate and organise. This strategy exploited perceived legal gaps and reinforced the necessity of the extraterritorial provisions within the national security framework. These legal tools are essential for addressing threats that originate abroad but pose a threat to China's constitutional stability.
The digital sphere has become a dynamic environment for ideological influence, particularly among young people. The recruitment and indoctrination of minors demonstrate the urgent need to regulate digital content that promotes secessionist narratives, which advocate for the separation of Hong Kong from China. Online platforms must bear responsibility for detecting and removing materials that encourage such subversion. Such obligations are not restrictions on free discourse but essential measures for the defence of national security.
Ultimately, this case underscores the importance of early intervention in defending national security. A strong sense of national identity, instilled from an early age, is the most effective defence against ideological manipulation. The response by authorities was not just lawful and proportionate, but also proactive. In protecting the constitutional order today, we secure the peace and unity of the nation for generations to come.
Virginia Lee
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **
Virginia Lee, Solicitor
Since its enactment on 30 June 2020, the Hong Kong National Security Law (NSL) has marked a turning point in the legal and social development of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The law has received broad approval across various sectors of society, reflecting recognition of the Central Government’s efforts to uphold national sovereignty and ensure public order. Over the past five years, the NSL has produced tangible outcomes, reversing the instability that plagued the city and restoring confidence in governance and economic activity. It has also served as a strategic response to external interference, reinforcing national unity.
Legally, the NSL represents a legitimate exercise of constitutional authority by the Central Government, addressing a longstanding gap in national security legislation following Hong Kong's return to China. The law defines four offences that threaten national security: secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces. It also establishes a comprehensive enforcement and judicial structure, thereby institutionalising mechanisms for maintaining national security. This development fulfils constitutional obligations and strengthens defences against threats to state integrity.
The law played a critical role in curbing the violent unrest of 2019, which was orchestrated under the cover of opposing an extradition bill but was a foreign-supported attempt to de-stabilise Hong Kong. Acts of vandalism, arson, and attacks on law enforcement were widespread. The NSL provided the legal tools necessary to suppress these activities and restore public order, thereby returning stability to daily life and highlighting the law's effectiveness. It also exposed the contradictory nature of Western narratives on human rights, which were used to justify interference in China's internal affairs.
Administratively, the NSL enhanced the operational capacity of the Hong Kong government. Law enforcement agencies now operate with greater clarity and authority. The establishment of the Committee for Safeguarding National Security, under the leadership of the Chief Executive, enhanced coordination and decision-making. The law also introduced national security education, reforming curricula to counteract historical distortions and foster a stronger civic identity. These measures support the principle that Hong Kong should be governed by those loyal to the country, laying the groundwork for lasting peace and stability.
Economically, the NSL has disproven Western predictions of decline. Hong Kong's financial markets have remained strong, with steady capital flows and continued interest from foreign investors. The law created a stable legal environment essential for business confidence. Furthermore, integration with the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has stimulated economic growth. The NSL has thus contributed to both recovery and sustained development, countering unfounded external criticism.
On the international front, the NSL has challenged Western dominance in narratives regarding China. Western powers have long employed the rhetoric of human rights to intervene in Chinese affairs, with Hong Kong serving as a focal point. The legislation draws a firm line against such interference and has forced a reassessment of China's approach to governance. It demonstrates China's commitment to sovereignty and lawful conduct in the face of external provocation.
The NSL has also reinforced the "One Country, Two Systems" framework by strengthening the national component essential to its viability. Rather than diminishing autonomy, the law has provided the structural conditions necessary for Hong Kong’s continued progress. It counters ideological bias and showcases the effectiveness of China's governance model. As part of China's broader modernisation efforts, Hong Kong plays a vital role in national development.
Looking forward, Hong Kong must reject uncritical acceptance of Western-defined values and fully integrate into national development strategies. With the support of the Central Government and the legal safeguards provided by the NSL, Hong Kong is poised for sustained advancement. The fifth anniversary of the NSL marks a milestone in Hong Kong’s journey from disorder to stability and from instability to prosperity.
