Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

New York City officers won't face charges in fatal shooting of 19-year-old man

News

New York City officers won't face charges in fatal shooting of 19-year-old man
News

News

New York City officers won't face charges in fatal shooting of 19-year-old man

2025-12-05 08:31 Last Updated At:09:00

Two New York City police officers won't be charged in the shooting death of a 19-year-old man during a mental health crisis last year as his mother and brother begged the officers not to open fire, state Attorney General Letitia James' office said Thursday.

Win Rozario was shot five times by the officers at his family's home in Queens on March 27, 2024, as he came at them while holding scissors in his hand, police body camera video showed. A person in the home had called 911 and told a dispatcher “I think my son is on drugs and is acting mad erratic," according to police.

The Office of Special Investigation in James' office concluded in its report that “a prosecutor would not be able to disprove beyond a reasonable doubt that the officers’ use of deadly force against Mr. Rozario was justified and, therefore, will not seek charges.”

The report also said that the reasonableness of the fear the officers, Salvatore Alongi and Matthew Cianfrocco, had when Rozario came at them with the scissors could not be disproven beyond a reasonable doubt. Both officers, however, still face an internal discipline trial on excessive force allegations by the city's Civilian Complaint Review Board, as well as a lawsuit by Rozario's family.

Rozario's mother, Notan Eva Costa, his father, Francis Rozario, and his brother, Utsho Rozario, criticized the decision not to prosecute the officers.

“State Attorney General Letitia James’ cowardly decision not to indict NYPD Officers Matthew Cianfrocco and Salvatore Alongi for murdering our beloved son and brother, Win Rozario, feels like we’re watching Win get murdered all over again," they said in a statement released by the Justice Committee advocacy group.

“We were safe in our home until Officers Cianfrocco and Alongi walked in and created chaos,” they said. “The NYPD should not be engaging with people experiencing a mental health episode.”

The attorney general's office did not immediately respond to a request for reaction to the family's comments Thursday evening.

The Office of Special Investigation's report recommends expanding citywide a pilot program that dispatches paramedics and mental health professionals as first responders to mental health emergency calls. It also recommends more training for officers on responding to such calls. And it says the state should enact a law allowing public health-based responses to people experiencing a mental health, alcohol use or substance use crisis.

Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani's platform includes expanding mental health services across the city, including having health professionals respond to mental health crises reported in 911 calls.

“Win Rozario’s death was a senseless tragedy that brought pain to so many New Yorkers, most of all his loved ones," Mamdani said in a statement Thursday.

He noted the officers are facing potential discipline and added, "What today’s decision does not change is our obligation to do everything in our power to ensure this does not happen again, our commitment to delivering the social services New Yorkers deserve, and our investment in both genuine public safety and justice for all.”

After the officers entered Rozario's home, Rozario grabbed a pair of scissors in the kitchen and took a few quick steps toward the officers, prompting one of them to fire a Taser, the police body camera video showed. Razario's mother then wrested the scissors away while holding onto him and police ordered her to get out of their way, prompting her to plea “Don't shoot" as she put the scissors on a chair and stepped aside.

The situation then quickly escalated, with an officer firing a Taser again and Rozario picking up the scissors and walking toward police. One officer then fired his handgun at Rozario, whose mother rushed to him, followed by her younger son, who tried to pull her away.

“Please do not shoot my mom!” Rozario’s brother cries.

“Get her out of the way!” police shout. Rozario’s mother and brother fall to the floor.

Officers then opened fire again at Rozario as he went toward them with the scissors.

Patrick Hendry, president of the Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York, a police union, said the attorney general's office made the right call in not prosecuting the officers.

“These police officers were placed in an incredibly difficult situation and forced to make split second decisions based on the risks to everyone at that scene,” he said in a statement.

This image made from New York Police Department body camera footage released by the New York Attorney General's Office shows an officer pointing his gun at Win Rozario in Rozario's family home on March 27, 2025, in the Queens borough of New York. (New York Police Department/New York Attorney General's Office via AP)

This image made from New York Police Department body camera footage released by the New York Attorney General's Office shows an officer pointing his gun at Win Rozario in Rozario's family home on March 27, 2025, in the Queens borough of New York. (New York Police Department/New York Attorney General's Office via AP)

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — Former South African President Jacob Zuma and his co-accused, the French arms manufacturer Thales, returned to court on Thursday to appeal for the dismissal of the long-running corruption case against them.

Zuma, one of the key figures of the South African liberation struggle who served as president from 2008 to 2018, is accused of corruption in connection with an arms transaction in 1999.

Here's what to know about the case:

Zuma faces 18 charges, including corruption, fraud, and money laundering, linked to 783 alleged illegal payments he received from French armaments manufacturer Thales (formerly Thomson-CSF) and business owner Schabir Shaik.

Zuma has refuted every indictment, saying the accusations are part of a “witch hunt” with political motivations. He is currently fighting to have the charges dropped after entering a not guilty plea.

The case has been ongoing for nearly two decades, facing multiple delays including legal challenges by Zuma’s team, which has repeatedly appealed and challenged the charges.

In a potentially groundbreaking development, the National Prosecuting Authority is arguing before Judge Nkosinathi Emmanuel Chili this week that Zuma and Thales should be blocked from using its appeals to further delay their trial.

“Our problem is that this strategy has delayed the case for 18 years,” advocate Trengrove told the court on Thursday. “Mr. Zuma has over the years run 8 different interlocutory applications and Thales has been part of four. They have between them delayed the hearing for more than 18 years, all those applications have been dismissed.”

The ex-president's lawyers have also questioned the lead prosecutor Advocate Billy Downer’s impartiality, leading to additional delays. The former president’s ill health has further stalled the case.

Zuma’s defense attorneys have also contended that without the testimony of two crucial Thales executives in the case —former directors Pierre Moynot and Alain Thetard, who died in 2020 and 2022 —they won’t be able to mount a meaningful defense.

Zuma was found in contempt of court by the South African Constitutional Court on June 29, 2021. He received a 15-month prison sentence for refusing to testify before the Zondo committee, a judicial commission investigating allegations of corruption.

Zuma surrendered himself to the police on July 7, 2021, and was taken to the Estcourt Correctional Center in KwaZulu-Natal. He was then released on medical parole, but the parole was ruled to be unlawful, and he was ordered to go back to prison. However, he was later released from prison after his sentence was commuted.

In October the former president was ordered to pay back $1.6 million (R28.9 million) in legal fees that were unlawfully funded by the state for his personal corruption defense. The Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ruled that Zuma must also pay interest on the amount, calculated at the prescribed rate.

Zuma has since been attempting to appeal the judgment for legal fees, claiming he’s not liable.

AP’s Africa coverage at: https://apnews.com/hub/africa

FILE - Former president Jacob Zuma is seen at the Results Operation Center in Midrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, on June 1, 2024. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe, File)

FILE - Former president Jacob Zuma is seen at the Results Operation Center in Midrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, on June 1, 2024. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe, File)

Recommended Articles