Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Takeaways from AP's report on banned Uyghur songs

ENT

Takeaways from AP's report on banned Uyghur songs
ENT

ENT

Takeaways from AP's report on banned Uyghur songs

2025-12-29 17:55 Last Updated At:18:16

Authorities in China’s Xinjiang region are threatening detention over downloading, sharing or listening to a wide range of Uyghur-language songs, the AP has found. The policy was revealed in a leaked recording of a public meeting last October in the city of Kashgar in Xinjiang, home to 11 million Uyghurs and other mostly Turkic ethnic minorities.

The leaked recording, shared exclusively with AP by Norway-based nonprofit Uyghur Hjelp, suggests that forms of repression continue in the region. A United Nations report in 2022 said China may have committed crimes against humanity in Xinjiang through its campaign of internment and political indoctrination that unfolded primarily between 2017 and 2019.

Here are the main takeaways from AP’s report:

During a meeting last October, police and other authorities in Kashgar warned residents that those who listened to so-called “problematic” Uyghur songs, stored them on their devices or shared them on social media could face detention.

Authorities played a pre-recorded message that included examples of banned songs, ranging from folk ballades to rap tunes and newer songs developed in the Uyghur diaspora.

The policy has been corroborated by AP interviews with two former Xinjiang residents who said their family members and friends have been detained for playing and sharing Uyghur music, and that police searched their or others’ phones looking for banned songs.

The AP also reviewed the court verdict of Uyghur music producer Yashar Xiaohelaiti, who was sentenced last year to three years in prison for uploading to his cloud account songs deemed sensitive.

There are seven categories of problematic songs that authorities warned residents to keep away from. These included songs with religious references; songs that “twist the Uyghurs’ history” and incite separatism; songs that smear the Chinese Communist Party’s rule of Xinjiang and incite terrorism and extremism; tunes that encourage resentment toward the government; and songs that advocate “filthy and dirty thoughts and behavior.”

In practice, almost any Uyghur-language song could be targeted, experts say. Problematic songs given as examples during the meeting included “Besh pede,” a popular folk song depicting a love story and that includes the word “God;” and “Forefathers,” a decades-old patriotic song by famed Uyghur musician Abdurehim Heyit, who was detained during the crackdown.

Those found listening to or sharing the banned songs could be “heavily prosecuted,” authorities warned. They did not specify punishment — something that usually gives authorities flexibility in enforcement — but gave the example of several people who had served 10 days in detention for being found with banned songs.

For one Uyghur music producer, Yashar Xiaohelaiti, the punishment has been much more severe. Xiaohelaiti was sentenced to three years in prison last year on charges of promoting extremism after uploading 42 “problematic” songs that he had produced to his account on NetEase Cloud Music, a Chinese music streaming service, according to a court verdict seen by AP.

The Chinese government insists that minorities in Xinjiang can freely express their culture and religion. Yet the renewed crackdown in the form of the songs ban suggests forms of repression continue, experts say.

“I think that most of the forms of repression that we saw in 2017-18-19 have either continued or gotten worse,” said Rian Thum, a senior lecturer in East Asian history at the University of Manchester. “The one thing that’s gone down is the number of people in reeducation camps and the visibility of security measures like roadblocks.”

Other, less conspicuous forms of control include the expansion of boarding schools, where middle-schoolers are educated while separated from their families and learn almost exclusively in Mandarin Chinese, he added, and random checks of phones for sensitive material including banned songs.

Rahima Mahmut, Uyghur human rights activist, performs with the London Uyghur Ensemble during an interview with The Associated Press in London, Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Joanna Chan)

Rahima Mahmut, Uyghur human rights activist, performs with the London Uyghur Ensemble during an interview with The Associated Press in London, Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Joanna Chan)

LONDON (AP) — Broadcaster Channel 4 has pulled all episodes of “Married at First Sight UK” from its platforms after three contestants claimed they were sexually assaulted by on-screen partners on the matchmaking reality show.

The broadcaster said the allegations are “very serious,” and the British government said Tuesday there must be “consequences for criminality or wrongdoing.”

“Married at First Sight” is an international reality TV franchise inspired by a Danish original, with editions in countries including the U.S., Australia and South Africa. Strangers are matched by experts and move in together after mock wedding ceremonies.

Two women who appeared on the British show say they were raped by their on-screen husbands, and a third claims she was subjected to a nonconsensual sexual act.

The claims were made during an investigation by the BBC current affairs program “Panorama.” The BBC said the claimants have not contacted the police, and the men involved dispute the allegations.

Conservative lawmaker Caroline Dinenage, who heads the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee, told the BBC that the show clearly involves “an element of risk.”

“It’s a TV show that almost expects and anticipates people that have only just met will have to become really quite intimate with each other,” she told the BBC. “They’re expected to share a bed and a life together within minutes of meeting. It almost feels like an accident waiting to happen.”

The U.K. version of the program is made by independent production company CPL. It has run for 10 seasons on Channel 4, with an 11th scheduled for broadcast this year. CPL did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The broadcaster said the show is produced under “some of the most comprehensive and robust welfare protocols in the industry,” including background checks, a code of conduct setting out behavioral standards and “daily contributor check-ins with a specialist welfare team.”

It has ordered a review of its welfare standards and procedures.

“I want to express my sympathy to contributors who have clearly been distressed after taking part in ‘Married at First Sight UK,’” Channel 4 chief executive Priya Dogra said. “The well-being of our contributors is always of paramount importance.”

The claims are the latest incident to spark debate in Britain about the ethics of reality TV and the pressures placed on participants. Two former contestants on the show “Love Island” died by suicide in 2018 and 2019 and the show’s former presenter, Caroline Flack, took her own life in 2020.

Controversies also have roiled the BBC, Britain’s publicly funded national broadcaster. The BBC introduced chaperones on the dance competition “Strictly Come Dancing” after allegations of bullying and harassment in 2024. The hosts of cooking contest “MasterChef,” Gregg Wallace and John Torode, were fired last year after investigations into allegations of inappropriate behavior.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This story includes discussion of sexual violence. If you or someone you know needs help, please call 1-800-656-4673 in the U.S.

FILE - General view at the entrance of the Channel 4 Headquarters in London, on April 5, 2022. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein, File)

FILE - General view at the entrance of the Channel 4 Headquarters in London, on April 5, 2022. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein, File)

Recommended Articles