Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Japanese rally against ruling parties' push for constitutional revision, military expansion

China

China

China

Japanese rally against ruling parties' push for constitutional revision, military expansion

2026-06-19 18:41 Last Updated At:23:37

Protesters gathered outside the Second Members' Office Building of the House of Representatives in Tokyo on Thursday, voicing strong opposition to the ruling coalition's push to revise Japan's war-renouncing constitution and expand military capabilities.

The protest came as the House of Representatives Commission on the Constitution passed a bill to revise the law on national referendums earlier in the day, clearing a procedural hurdle toward amending the constitution.

The bill was approved with support from the ruling coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the Japan Innovation Party (JIP) as well as some opposition parties.

At the same commission meeting, representatives from various parties also held a discussion on revising Article 9 of the constitution, the so-called "peace clause" that renounces war and prohibits Japan from maintaining armed forces or otherwise creating the potential for war.

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's government aims to revise the country's three key security documents by the end of the year. Last week, the LDP approved a draft proposal that called for securing necessary funding to transform Japan's defense capabilities within five years.

Although it stopped short of setting a specific defense spending goal, the proposal cited examples of countries targeting defense budgets above 3 percent of GDP, fueling concern over a potential further increase in Japan's defense outlays.

Protesters at Thursday's rally voiced fierce opposition to these moves, viewing them as a dangerous shift toward militarism.

"The increase in defense spending is preparation for war. They are trying to transform the entire economic system into a war economy. This is not about making people's lives better - it's about expanding funds for killing. I firmly oppose it. And today at the constitutional review meeting, they even talked about changing the procedures for constitutional amendment. Some from the Japan Innovation Party went as far as saying there is no problem with Japan possessing nuclear submarines. We can see that Japan is moving step by step toward war. That is why I believe we must amplify our voices of opposition," a protester said in an interview with the China Media Group (CMG).

Another protester expressed concern about the shifting political sentiment that has been taking place since the end of the Second World War.

"At the level of national consciousness, people have long held the belief that 'we absolutely do not want war.' But as the generation born before the war gradually passes away, many politicians born during the postwar period, like Sanae Takaichi, once pushed in a certain direction, are all trying to turn Japan into a country that can wage war," he said.

A third rally participant squarely criticized the Takaichi administration and the steps it has taken toward remilitarization.

"I believe the Takaichi administration's intention to revise the constitution is already clear. This so-called constitutional revision is being pushed for the sake of war. I cannot accept discussions that are premised on war," he told CMG.

Japanese rally against ruling parties' push for constitutional revision, military expansion

Japanese rally against ruling parties' push for constitutional revision, military expansion

Some Iranian citizens are skeptical about the prospects for a lasting peace agreement, after the United States and Iran agreed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that ended more than 100 days of conflict between the two countries.

Iran, the United States and Pakistan early Monday announced the finalization of the MoU on ending the war in the region on all fronts, including Lebanon. The agreement was signed early Thursday by the Iranian president and his U.S. counterpart, Donald Trump.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance said Thursday at a White House briefing that the MoU triggered a 60-day negotiating period that began on Thursday and is due to expire on Aug 17.

On the streets of Tehran, residents expressed mixed reactions towards the MoU, with some voicing wariness based on past experience with negotiations.

"If an agreement is reached and it serves the interests of our country, we support it. However, during the previous two rounds of negotiations we were attacked, and officials must be cautious and take the interests of the Iranian people into account in these talks and agreements, so that they lead to economic prosperity and improved conditions," said Alireza, a Tehran resident.

"We are not at all optimistic about Mr. Trump. During the negotiations, we were attacked twice. I think this time will be the same as before," said Aziz, another Tehran resident.

On Feb. 28, Israel and the United States launched joint attacks on Tehran and other Iranian cities. Iran responded with waves of missile and drone attacks targeting Israel and U.S. bases and assets in the region.

Tehran residents express skepticism following signing of Iran-US MoU

Tehran residents express skepticism following signing of Iran-US MoU

Recommended Articles