PLYMOUTH, Mass. (AP) — The deadlocked jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial went home without a verdict Thursday following a dramatic sixth day of deliberations.
Her defense lawyer sought to remove one of the jurors after the foreperson said in a note that the juror wouldn’t follow the judge’s instructions about reasonable doubt. The judge declined, and ordered the jurors and alternates to return Friday morning.
If they can’t agree whether or not the Massachusetts woman is criminally responsible for killing her three children, then the judge could declare a mistrial. The case has raised awareness about postpartum mental health care for mothers nationwide.
Here’s the latest:
Reddington told reporters outside the courthouse that the foreperson’s note identified the holdout juror to the judge.
And he’s hoping that before the judge questions that juror on Friday, attorneys on both sides will get to argue over the specifics of that inquiry.
Reddington wants that debate out in the open, not in a private sidebar conversation.
Reddington expressed hope that the trial will be resolved after the judge questions a juror on Friday.
“There will be an inquiry by the judge tomorrow at 9 o’clock,” Reddington told reporters outside the courthouse. “There’s a person who has doubt but will not listen to the judge’s instructions.”
As for why Clancy was able to join a sidebar discussion between the judge and lawyers, Reddington said: “She has a right to know what’s going on.”
They left the courtroom and entered the elevator with a member of Reddington’s defense team, who was holding a box of letters written to Clancy from supporters.
The jurors eyes were on the floor as they filed into the courtroom. Some had their hands clasped in front of them. As they took their seats, they seemed expressionless, their faces like stone.
“Remember the instructions I have given you over and over again,” the judge reminded them, telling them to stay away from any news coverage or discussion about the case.
The judge then excused them until Friday morning at 9 a.m., and declared the court in recess until then.
15 min ago
“The court has an instruction from the foreperson of that jury that has been working for a week now saying there is one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you have given him or her on reasonable doubt,” Reddington said, his voicing rising. “I suggest respectfully that the soft instruction that you gave them saying at the sidebar can you listen to the law as I instruct you does not focus on the issue.”
But Sullivan said removing a juror from a “deliberating jury is a sensitive undertaking.”
“I don’t feel it is proper to side for me to side side with one side or the other of the deliberations. I don’t feel it’s appropriate for me to say I agree with one juror or 11,” Sullivan said. “At this point, I have asked if they are able follow instructions. They swore earlier they could. They have said at this point they can.”
While the jury has twice sent the judge notes saying it couldn’t agree on a verdict, this is the first time it has indicated possible tension or acrimony in the deliberation room.
According to Reddington, the jury foreperson complained to the judge that one jurors was refusing to listen to the law on reasonable doubt.
That kind of complaint about an individual juror was missing from the earlier notes, which just said the group wasn’t unanimous.
The deadlocked jury twice told the judge in the past two days that they can’t agree whether the Massachusetts mother is criminally responsible for killing her three children.
Reddington now said a juror apparently is not following the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt and he wants the juror kicked off the panel.
“If we come back here in a half-hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it’s a shame — it’s a real shame,” Reddington said.
But prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said the judge’s instruction was appropriate and no further action was necessary.
“I’ve asked if they’ve been able to follow my instructions. They swore earlier that they could,” Sullivan said.
Clancy’s defense lawyer has asked the judge to remove one juror who he says has “spurned” the instructions of the court.
“There is one juror who refuses to listen to the law you have given him or her on reasonable doubt” Reddington said.
The judge responds that it’s not appropriate for him to rule one way or another.
“I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to say I agree with one juror or 11,” says Sullivan.
The judge said “the defendant’s objection is noted” and sent the court into recess as deliberations continue.
Once the judge asked the jurors to resume deliberations, some in the audience gasped.
The jurors showed no visible emotion at the instruction, nor did Clancy’s family.
At the sidebar, Reddington is talking to the judge and waving his arm in the air.
“I want to remind you that you are required to follow my instructions on the law as I gave you,” he told them.
“It is not enough for prosecutors to show a probability, or even a strong probability, of guilt,” the judge said.
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond all possible doubt, the judge added.
And then he sent them back into the jury room.
Reddington sighed, crossed his arms and walked back to the defense table. Clancy and the other attorneys returned to their respective seats as well.
The courtroom is silent except for the sound of reporters typing on their keyboards.
The jury has now been called back into the courtroom.
Once each juror speaks to the judge, they are taken back out of the courtroom. Reddington is standing behind Clancy, who is about three feet from the jurors as they are brought in.
The jurors are entering one by one, and being sworn in. The judge is talking to each juror, but it’s not yet clear what they are talking about. Each one then leaves the courtroom.
Reddington held his hands at his side, looking out at the courtroom, and then sighed as he walked over to confer with Clancy before wheeling her up to join the sidebar. It’s the first such meeting for her in this trial.
Reddington puts his hands on Clancy’s shoulder and she turned to talk to him. Now Reddington is speaking to the judge, slicing the air with this hand.
Two court officers have also joined the sidebar, which has now stretched past the 10 minute mark.
The discussion between the judge and attorneys on both sides is impassioned, with Clancy’s attorney Reddington pointing his finger for emphasis and the judge handing him a document.
The sidebar conversations are intended to be private, not done in front of a jury or on a court livestream. The court is playing a white noise machine to help prevent anyone from overhearing the conversation.
The discussion has gone on for at least five minutes, making it one of the longer sidebars since the trial began.
Judge William F. Sullivan entered the courtroom and called the lawyers to a sidebar. He didn’t explain what they would be talking about. That has been the judge’s practice, to speak to the lawyers first in private before explaining to the room what is happening. The jury is not present.
The courtroom has been reopened to journalists and spectators, which has been done when the court plans to go back into session. The courtroom is packed with every seat taken.
Plymouth District Attorney Timothy Cruz and other members of the district attorneys office are in court. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington is here too, alongside Clancy in her wheelchair.
Clancy’s parents, Paula and Mike Musgrove, are sitting next to her sister, Allison Ozga. A priest from a Duxbury church is next to Clancy’s father.
The public appears polarized about Clancy, with both harsh criticism and supportive comments teeming online. Many believe she should be punished for what she did, while her sympathizers say a criminal case should never have been filed.
Rhonda Gonsalves was at the courthouse on Monday calling for a conviction, in contrast to the many Clancy supporters who have attended the trial. The Plymouth resident wore white in honor of Clancy’s children.
“White for innocence. They’re the only innocent ones here, you know, I think anyways,” she said. “She should be found guilty for what she did to her kids. … She murdered three children.”
Jeanne DeSanto said she first assumed Clancy was a horrible person for killing her kids, but watching the trial online changed her view.
“And then, no — it’s women’s health, it’s mental health, it’s systemic. It’s way bigger, and I’ve completely shifted,” she said Thursday, her first day coming to the courthouse.
DeSanto said that if a mistrial is declared, she wants to participate in a letter-writing campaign to Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and the district attorney, urging them to stop pursuing the criminal case.
“She’s not a danger to anyone other than herself — no one else,” DeSanto said. “What’s the point?”
She hopes Clancy could eventually become an advocate for changes in postpartum mental health care, including better communication between providers.
Emily Collins came to the courthouse for the first time Thursday after having watched the livestream, wearing pink clothing like other Clancy supporters there.
She said she experienced severe postpartum depression after having the first of her three children in the 1970s.
“This was all I wanted -- being a wife and mother. So I was like, what is happening to me? Very scary,” Collins said. She recalls having suicidal thoughts and struggling to get out of bed some days amid waves of depression.
Now 64 and a former social worker, Collins thinks the Clancy case should not have been brought to trial. It’s a tough one for jurors, she said.
“It’s just a polarizing subject. I don’t think they’re ever going to get everyone to agree.”
Patrick Clancy was the prosecution’s first witness after opening arguments, taking the stand in late July.
He has said in interviews that he forgives his wife, whom he viewed as ill, not evil. He has since moved to New York City and remarried.
During the trial, Patrick Clancy testified about the horrific events of the day of the killings and Lindsay Clancy’s mental health deteriorating. He left the courtroom as prosecutors played his emotional 911 call.
“She killed the kids!” he was recorded yelling.
He hasn’t returned to the proceedings since testifying, but other members of Patrick’s and Lindsay’s families have been sitting together during court sessions.
On his way into the courthouse, defense attorney Kevin Reddington carried a box of letters in support of Clancy “from all over the world.”
“It’s just amazing. She reads them all,” he told reporters.
Reddington said he’s ready for a second trial if this one ends with a hung jury and the prosecutor wants to try again.
“I’ve got witnesses lined up. We’re all set. So let’s go,” he said.
Journalists and about 20 spectators are milling about inside the Plymouth County courthouse on a rainy day while the jury deliberates. Some of the onlookers are wearing pink shirts in support of Clancy.
The livestreamed trial has generated intense interest, drawing crowds to the courthouse every day. The case has sparked deep public divisions over Clancy’s culpability and maternal mental health care after childbirth.
Panel members mostly looked at the floor as they entered the courtroom on Thursday morning.
The panel has been considering whether or not Clancy is guilty of murder, or lesser manslaughter charges, or not guilty due to mental disease or defect.
A murder conviction could bring a life sentence. A not guilty verdict could result in Clancy’s continued confinement at a psychiatric hospital.
The split among the jury in terms of guilty or not guilty has not been disclosed.
Sullivan asked them if anything had happened overnight that would affect their ability to be impartial. They said no and then returned to the jury room.
The judge brought the 12 jurors and six alternates into the courtroom briefly before sending them back to the deliberation room.
If a verdict cannot be reached, a mistrial will be declared, and the case essentially goes back to the same status as before the trial, with Clancy charged with murder and held at a psychiatric hospital awaiting a resolution of the criminal case.
Prosecutors will decide whether to try again with a new jury. If they do, the jury selection process will begin again, and a new trial will be scheduled.
Prosecutors could also offer a plea deal to Clancy, said Brad Bailey, a Boston defense attorney and former prosecutor who is not involved in the case.
“Any time the threat of a retrial with murder one hanging over the client is re-interjected, defense lawyers will, at the very least, explore whether or not there’s any interest in a resolution,” Bailey said.
Postpartum psychosis is estimated to afflict only 1 to 2 per 1,000 women after delivery. Experts at the Cleveland Clinic describe it as a mental health emergency affecting someone’s sense of reality.
It can happen to anyone after giving birth, but the chances are higher for people with certain mental health conditions. In a journal article on the subject in 2023, researchers at the Medical University of Lublin in Poland said about half of people with postpartum psychosis have a previous history of psychiatric problems and the most common risk factor associated with the condition is bipolar affective disorder, which causes extreme mood swings.
Though most people with postpartum psychosis don’t harm their children, mothers with severe cases may try to do so, and also may try to harm themselves.
Experts say it’s important to seek immediate help if you or your partner or family member show signs of postpartum psychosis.
▶ Read more
Dawn Light, 56, was arraigned on an intimidation charge Wednesday at the same courthouse as Clancy’s trial. Authorities say she filmed jurors leaving the courthouse a day earlier.
Light, a retired nurse and Clancy supporter, told reporters she was there: “To see Lindsay. And I did see her. She was getting picked up by the van.”
Her lawyer Jennifer White called it a “misunderstanding.”
A not-guilty plea was entered on Light’s behalf and she was ordered to stay away from the court, jurors and witnesses.
The arrest prompted the judge to ask each juror Wednesday if they saw anything that would affect their impartiality, Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington told The Associated Press. The judge also opened the day’s proceedings with a warning that he had issued an order governing how people should conduct themselves at the courthouse. That order barred people from filming, following, contacting or tampering with jurors.
On Wednesday, the jury sent the court a note saying it couldn’t unanimously agree on a verdict, despite days of trying. The jury had sent a similar note Tuesday morning. Neither note revealed anything about how the jury might be split or said anything about the tone of deliberations.
Sullivan then gave the jury a legal instruction sometimes known as a “dynamite charge” because it is intended to help a jury break through an impasse.
He told the jurors not to abandon their own convictions just to reach a verdict, but urged them to seriously consider opposing views and reassess their positions if appropriate. No one knows, he added, whether another jury would be “more intelligent, more impartial or more competent to decide it than you are.”
Such instructions are common in many states and the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld their constitutionality, but they are barred in some states because of concerns they might be coercive.
Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial will return for a sixth day of deliberations after twice saying they couldn’t agree whether the Massachusetts mother is criminally responsible for killing her three young children.
The judge told jurors to keep deliberating Wednesday when they said for a second straight day that they were at an impasse — a sign there’s a growing chance of a hung jury and the trial ending without a resolution.
Clancy, a 36-year-old former labor and delivery nurse, doesn’t deny strangling her children in the basement of their home in 2023. Her attorney argues that postpartum psychosis led to her actions, while prosecutors say she knew what she was doing when she killed Cora, Dawson and Callan Clancy, ages 5, 3 and 8 months.
“I know it’s been a long day,” Judge William Sullivan said, “so at this point, what I’m going to do is, first off, thank you for your time and commitment to this case. I’m going to ask you to come back tomorrow morning.”
Clancy stared at the jury with no expression when Sullivan earlier in the day explained to the courtroom that the jurors were at a standstill.
Judge William Sullivan asks the jury to continue deliberations during Lindsay Clancy's murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Mass., Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2026. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)
A text message Lindsay Clancy sent her mom is presented during closing arguments in her murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Mass., Thursday, Aug. 27, 2026. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)
Lindsay Clancy and attorney Kevin Reddington watch as Judge William Sullivan tells the jury to keep discussing a possible verdict after jurors said for a second time they couldn't agree whether Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children in 2023, Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026, in Plymouth, Mass. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington holds up a picture of th Clancy family before the murders during closing arguments in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Mass., Thursday, Aug. 27, 2026. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)
