Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Nicaragua tells top UN court Germany is violating international law by selling weapons to Israel

News

Nicaragua tells top UN court Germany is violating international law by selling weapons to Israel
News

News

Nicaragua tells top UN court Germany is violating international law by selling weapons to Israel

2026-09-08 18:31 Last Updated At:18:50

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Nicaragua told the United Nations’ top court on Tuesday that Germany has breached the Genocide Convention by selling Israel weapons that were used in the country's war in Gaza.

Nicaragua argued that Germany is violating international law by “facilitating” acts of genocide in Gaza by providing arms and other military support to Israel, in proceedings at the International Court of Justice. Berlin denies the allegation.

While the case centers on Germany, it indirectly takes aim at Israel’s campaign in Gaza in response to the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas. Israel, which isn’t a party in the proceedings, strongly denies that its actions amount to acts of genocide. The preliminary hearings focus on whether the court has jurisdiction.

The proceedings are the latest legal attempt to rein in Israel’s military campaign by a country with historic ties to the Palestinian people, after South Africa accused Israel of genocide at the same court in 2023.

“It is impossible that with the type of political, commercial and military relations of Germany with Israel, they could not be aware, or normally should have been aware, of the serious risk that acts that could amount to genocide were being committed by Israel,” Nicaragua's top lawyer, Carlos José Argüello Gómez, told the court.

Germany has been a staunch supporter of Israel for decades and is the second-largest supplier of arms to Israel after the United States.

Nicaragua’s government has historical links with Palestinian organizations dating back to their support for the 1979 Sandinista revolution.

On Monday, Germany told the court that the case was improperly filed and should be thrown out.

“Nicaragua’s conduct indicates that it was not interested in hearing Germany’s view on its allegations, but simply in bringing Germany before this court,” Julia Monar, Germany’s top lawyer, told the judges. Countries are typically expected to attempt to resolve disputes before bringing them to the court.

Lawyers for Nicaragua denied this, pointing to documents sent to the German foreign ministry as well as press releases describing the dispute.

The ruling on jurisdiction is expected later this year and, if Nicaragua's case moves forward, the proceedings could take years.

Members of the legal delegation representing Nicaragua, including counsel and advocate Daniel Mueller, right, attend public hearings on the preliminary objections raised by Germany in the case brought by Nicaragua at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) at the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, Sept. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Mouneb Taim)

Members of the legal delegation representing Nicaragua, including counsel and advocate Daniel Mueller, right, attend public hearings on the preliminary objections raised by Germany in the case brought by Nicaragua at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) at the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, Sept. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Mouneb Taim)

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. (AP) — Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was scheduled to appear in court remotely Tuesday for a hearing on a claim that an accuser wants to recant allegations that Sandusky sexually abused him years ago.

The hearing is part of the latest bid by Sandusky’s lawyers to secure a new trial for him.

Sandusky, 82, has been serving a decades-long prison sentence since he was convicted of 45 counts of sexual abuse in 2012, after eight young men testified about what happened to them as boys. He has repeatedly lost efforts to get a new trial.

The Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General has said the supposed recantation is “highly suspect.”

The accuser, identified in court documents as R.R., said he was coached extensively by authorities, that he could “safely affirm details I did not fully recall,” he said in an affidavit filed by Sandusky’s attorneys.

R.R.’s allegations were “based on suggestive leading questioning, prosecutorial coercion and influence, confirmatory bias and memory manipulation,” defense attorneys said.

Sandusky was the defensive coordinator at one of the country’s top football programs under Hall of Fame head coach Joe Paterno. The scandal led to Paterno’s firing, and the university paid more than $100 million to people who said they were abused by Sandusky.

Authorities said he found and groomed boys at The Second Mile, a charity he founded for at-risk youth. Sandusky has repeatedly declared his innocence.

R.R., who was 25 years old at trial, testified that when he was 11, Sandusky sexually abused him in the coach’s basement in 1998, a transcript shows.

FILE - Former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky arrives at the Centre County Courthouse, Friday, Nov. 22, 2019, in Bellefonte, Pa. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

FILE - Former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky arrives at the Centre County Courthouse, Friday, Nov. 22, 2019, in Bellefonte, Pa. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

Recommended Articles