Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Infantino’s World Cup investment plan fallout reshapes the March FIFA vote

Sport

Infantino’s World Cup investment plan fallout reshapes the March FIFA vote
Sport

Sport

Infantino’s World Cup investment plan fallout reshapes the March FIFA vote

2026-10-07 01:54 Last Updated At:02:50

GENEVA (AP) — FIFA President Gianni Infantino already is in globe-trotting campaign mode more than five months ahead of the vote when 211 member federations decide who will lead the world soccer body until 2031.

The March election comes as Infantino faces the biggest leadership crisis since he took office in 2016, triggered by backlash against his now-withdrawn plan to sell private investors a stake in the commercial rights to the World Cup and other FIFA tournaments.

The FIFA leader has a busy travel schedule as the vote approaches. In the past two weeks his Qatari jet has criss-crossed the world, from Saudi Arabia to New York, across the Caribbean, to northern Europe, then central and South-East Asia, where he’s met at least 20 of the federations who will vote on March 18 in Morocco.

So where do things stand?

An Associated Press tally shows 87 of the 211 FIFA Member federations have indicated support for Infantino – either in individual comments or by endorsing statements of support by their regional confederations.

That puts him within reach of the simple majority he would need to beat a challenger, though none has stepped forward so far.

As of Tuesday, 49 federations, mostly in Europe, had come out against Infantino.

More than one-third of FIFA members have yet to announce their position, and much could change by March. A key date is the Nov. 18 deadline for intended rivals to enter the contest.

European soccer body UEFA, backed by the leadership of North American soccer body CONCACAF and the Asian Football Confederation, has promised to put up at least one challenger to Infantino. Who that would be remains unclear.

The issue is likely to be discussed as UEFA’s 55 member federations meet in Berlin this week.

UEFA has called on Infantino to step down, and many of its members have publicly withdrawn their support for him. But not all UEFA members have fallen into line — one of his top aides is from Azerbaijan, which has expressed continued support for Infantino.

Africa and South America are Infantino strongholds. In August, the executive committee of African confederation CAF “unanimously” confirmed its support for Infantino. However, it’s unclear whether every member will follow the CAF line in March. Most haven’t expressed their views publicly.

Infantino is expected to attend a CAF meeting in Cape Verde this week.

All 10 members of South American confederation CONMEBOL have endorsed Infantino including World Cup finalist Argentina. They want Infantino to expand the 2030 World Cup which would give South America more entries and more games to host. UEFA opposes that 64-team idea.

The Asian confederation AFC has joined the criticism of Infantino, but its members appear far from united. Former World Cup host Qatar has expressed support for the FIFA leader while Jordan has declared its opposition.

CONCACAF is also split with the U.S. and Canada among those opposing Infantino and Mexico coming out in support.

In Oceania, the Solomon Islands, Tahiti and New Caledonia have said they back Infantino, while New Zealand withdrew its support in August.

When the FIFA chief watched the World Cup final on July 19 at MetLife Stadium near New York, he had the support of nearly all FIFA member associations and there was little doubt that he would win re-election for a third term.

Just nine days later, media reports detailed Infantino’s talks with New York investor Josh Kushner – the younger brother of Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner - to create a FIFA subsidiary running tournaments like the World Cup.

A backlash led by European soccer and fueled by senior FIFA executives forced Infantino to drop the sell-off plan within four days. Since then, his leadership has been called into question by many European associations, who have withdrawn their support for him one by one.

UEFA even said it’s preparing a criminal complaint against Infantino over the investment plan. FIFA dismissed the legal moves as a “smear campaign.”

No sitting FIFA president has lost an election in the last 50 years. The ability to control and distribute World Cup profits now counted in multi-billions to member federations has always been a key advantage for the incumbent.

FIFA rules state candidates must have “played an active role in association football (e.g. as a player or an official within FIFA, a confederation or an association, etc.) for two of the last five years before being proposed.” They must have “declarations of support” from at least five of the 211 members.

In a ballot of two candidates, a simple majority of valid votes will win. With three or more candidates, a winning majority is “two thirds of the votes of the member associations present and eligible to vote.” The candidate with the lowest total in each round is eliminated until there is a winner with two thirds, or just two candidates left.

Across the world, some members have reason not to announce their voting intention. There is a long-time fear in global soccer politics of retribution for not backing the winner. Spain, for example, is unlikely to advertise its vote while competing with Infantino’s close ally Morocco to host the 2030 World Cup final.

See AP’s full soccer coverage here

FIFA President Gianni Infantino attends the Women's U20 World Cup final soccer match between Spain and North Korea in Lodz, Poland, Sunday, Sept. 27, 2026. (AP Photo/Beata Zawrzel)

FIFA President Gianni Infantino attends the Women's U20 World Cup final soccer match between Spain and North Korea in Lodz, Poland, Sunday, Sept. 27, 2026. (AP Photo/Beata Zawrzel)

WASHINGTON (AP) — A day after President Donald Trump said he would start paying for controversial taxpayer-funded ads with a campaign account, there's no sign he plans to refund the millions of federal dollars already spent on them.

Nearly $12 million worth of ads have already aired, according to AdImpact, as part of the $20 million the Department of Homeland Security tapped for the contract.

But Trump’s plan to pay for the ads with MAGA Inc. doesn’t mean there’s any reimbursement coming, said a White House official who was not authorized to talk publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Trump said the ads were “really good” and “promotion for the country, done by many presidents before.” Asked whether he'd repay the funds already spent, he said, “We’ll decide.”

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer slammed Trump for not committing to reimbursement and said he believes the president’s plan for covering future costs represents illegal coordination with his super PAC.

“Trump must return this money to the American people and there must be a full investigation into this gross waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars,” Schumer told The Associated Press.

The ads, which began airing in late September, glorify Trump and echo his political messaging going into the midterms. One features a clip of Trump talking about the threat of communism and another is a replay of an ad from his last presidential campaign. The fifth ad in the campaign began airing Tuesday, focusing on the Trump administration's capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

Republicans and Democrats alike have said the ads aren't an appropriate use of U.S. government money. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, said they shouldn't be paid for with taxpayer dollars.

The Trump administration tapped $20 million from the Department of Homeland Security to pay for the campaign-style ads glorifying the president that have drawn widespread criticism. Two top Democratic senators said last week that the money is being drawn from Trump’s so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill” and was supposed to go toward U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Republican Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, who chairs the panel that oversees DHS funding, said Tuesday that she had not yet seen Trump’s ads, but she said taxpayer money should be used as intended.

“We’ll take a look at that,” Britt said at the Capitol. “You want to make sure that any use of taxpayer dollars is done judiciously and in accordance with the law.”

Legal experts said the ads might even violate federal statutes, including a law against congressionally appropriated money being used for “publicity or propaganda” and another limiting the partisan political activities of government employees.

The White House has defended the ads as public service announcements similar to what past administrations have done to promote policies. Trump on Monday posted on his Truth Social platform calling the ads “positive promotion for our Great U.S.A.” while also promising to pay for them with “money I raised for MAGA Inc.”

That is Trump’s political war chest, which had amassed more than $400 million by the end of July. Trump has begun tapping it to boost Republican candidates across the country in the midterm elections.

AP Congressional Correspondent Lisa Mascaro contributed to this report.

President Donald Trump gestures to reporters as he walks on the South Lawn upon his arrival at the White House, Monday, Oct. 5, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

President Donald Trump gestures to reporters as he walks on the South Lawn upon his arrival at the White House, Monday, Oct. 5, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Recommended Articles