SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Warriors center Draymond Green was ejected two minutes into the third quarter of Golden State's 116-113 victory over the Phoenix Suns on Monday night for consecutive technical fouls.
"He lit a fire in all of us and we had to respond, so I'm glad we did," Stephen Curry said.
Tempers flared again with 7:26 remaining in the game as players pushed and shoved, separated by security personnel. Miles Bridges received a technical as “a physical escalator” when he ran to the baseline area and pushed Golden State's Charles Bassey after Bassey kept his arms wrapped around Jalen Green's head after they fought for a rebound beneath the basket.
“That was a dumb time to get a technical,” Bridges said. “It would've been able to tie the game up. But it's a physical game, a lot of emotions, a lot of missed calls, a lot of calls that were called that shouldn't have been called.”
The previous period, Khaman Maluach had pushed Draymond Green to the ground in the paint moments earlier and the Golden State star jumped up from beneath and wrapped his arms around the Suns center and threw him to the floor. Dillon Brooks immediately sprinted in to enter the fray and approached Green, and they pushed and shoved. Green put his hand on Brooks' neck, and both received technicals.
“I was just trying to deescalate the whole thing,” Brooks said. “He did a lot there, fell down, and pushed him at the end of it. I was just trying to deescalate it. He was just tweaking all game. So let it be.”
The Warriors appreciated Green's fire.
“I loved it. It fueled our team," guard Brandin Podziemski said. "We didn't have that edge to ust to start the game. Found it a little bit in the second quarter and then they came out in the third quarter pretty well and then that kind of changed the game for us. Everybody locked in a little bit more and came together for Dray. I think it was needed. Maybe he sensed it, maybe he didn't, but it helped us.”
It marked Draymond Green's first ejection this season and 23rd of his career after he had two last season. He has 182 career technicals, three this season.
Maluach said Green was just playing like his intense self.
“I think it's just a basketball paly, he's just out there playing basketball,” Maluach said. “Nothing against Draymond, he's just playing basketball out there.”
See AP’s full NBA coverage here
Golden State Warriors guard Stephen Curry (30) shoots against Phoenix Suns forward Miles Bridges (22) during the first half of an NBA basketball game in San Francisco, Monday, Nov. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Jed Jacobsohn)
Phoenix Suns forward Dillon Brooks (3) drives to the basket against Golden State Warriors guard Stephen Curry (30) during the first half of an NBA basketball game in San Francisco, Monday, Nov. 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Jed Jacobsohn)
MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — Australia’s highest court on Tuesday began hearing constitutional challenges to the nation’s world-first legislation banning children younger than 16 from popular social media platforms.
The seven High Court judges began hearing two challenges to the ban that took effect last year on young children holding accounts on Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, Kick, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube and Twitch.
The first challenge was brought by Sydney-based rights group Digital Freedom Project.
They claim the law improperly robs millions of young Australians of a right to freedom of political communication implied in Australia’s constitution.
The second challenge comes from U.S. online forum Reddit, which argues the ban raised issues of privacy and political expression. Reddit also argued that it should not have included in the same category as other banned social media platforms.
The two-day hearing will end Wednesday.
Two Sydney 15-year-olds, Noah Jones and Macy Neyland, had been included as plaintiffs when the Digital Freedom Project case was filed last year. But the pair were removed over concerns they could be held liable for legal costs should the case fail.
Noah Jones, who is now 16 and no longer subject to the ban, told reporters outside court the legislation amounted to a government step toward censorship.
“I believe that this is just a stepping stone further and further to censorship and I think they’ve masked it as this form of child safety," Noah Jones said.
"But in the end, it’s really just them trying to slowly gain more and more control of what young people see as they will be voters,” he added.
Noah’s mother, Renee Jones, told reporters she was “fiercely afraid” of problems social media presented to young people, but the government’s legislation missed the mark.
She said the ban would leave young people ignorant about safe online interaction and the dangers that came with being on social media.
“I want my son to grow up into a young Australian man who is resilient, who is responsible online, who can identify the dangers, and who is able to vet some of these things,” the mother told reporters.
The government announced in June it was considering strengthening laws behind the ban. This followed evidence that young children were continuing to remain on social media.
The 10 targeted platforms face fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars ($34.5 million) if they fail to take reasonable steps to remove the accounts of young children.
A study published in the British Medical Journal in June found 85% of a group of Australian 12- to 17-year-olds continued to use restricted platforms.
The government's own research released in March showed 7 in 10 underage children continued to hold accounts on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok since December.
Communications Minister Anika Wells was in court for the proceedings and later told reporters the laws were under attack.
“We are here to defendant a fundamental tenet of Australian democracy which is an Australian’s right, and particularly an Australian child’s right, to be free from harm, and we seek to defendant that from sustained ideological attack,” Wells said.
FILE - Three boys use their phones while sitting outside a school in Sydney, Dec. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Rick Rycroft, File)
