Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Caritas Medical Centre Reports Investigation Findings on Patient Miscommunication Leading to Tragic Death

HK

Caritas Medical Centre Reports Investigation Findings on Patient Miscommunication Leading to Tragic Death
HK

HK

Caritas Medical Centre Reports Investigation Findings on Patient Miscommunication Leading to Tragic Death

2025-05-06 17:30 Last Updated At:05-07 12:06

Caritas Medical Centre announces root cause analysis report of previous sentinel event

The following is issued on behalf of the Hospital Authority:

The spokesperson for Caritas Medical Centre (CMC) today (May 6) announces the root cause analysis report of a previous sentinel event:

A 75-year-old male non-communicative patient with a history of hypertension and Alzheimer's disease was admitted to CMC for abdominal pain and constipation on February 28. According to hospital records, the patient started a puree diet instead of a minced diet in February.

The patient was restricted from eating and drinking until March 2, when a fluid diet was resumed as his condition improved. On March 3, a doctor ordered DAT (abbreviation of the term "diet as tolerated"), intending to resume the patient's usual diet, while the term concerned was interpreted as a regular diet by a nurse. The patient choked while being fed a regular diet and passed away during the afternoon on the same day despite resuscitation efforts.

CMC announced the incident afterward and a Root Cause Analysis Panel was formed to analyse the incident. After reviewing the case, the Panel concluded that the root cause of the incident was the varied interpretations of the term concerned, which led to communication gaps and misaligned practices among the clinical team.

The Panel considered that multiple factors were involved in this sentinel event. There was a lack of communication between medical and nursing staff regarding dietary orders. The inclusion of a DAT as a standard diet type in some electronic systems might have created the perception that the instruction referred to a specific diet type. Additionally, some nursing teaching materials equate the term with a regular diet, which could also have contributed to varied understanding in daily clinical practice.

The Panel also found that DAT was not a standard option in the electronic bed panel system, but the term concerned was entered as free text, leading to varying interpretations of the patient's dietary requirements. Moreover, there was no standardised process for patient assessment, diet selection, and documentation of diet tolerance.

The Panel made the following recommendations:

  • The interpretation of the term DAT should be aligned and communicated to staff;
  • The use of DAT as a diet type option in all forms and electronic systems should be removed to eliminate ambiguity;
  • The dietary management workflow from patient assessment to communication to meal provision should be enhanced; and
  • The terminology for diet options in the Dietetics and Catering Order System should be standardised with the electronic bed panel system. The interface between these systems should be improved to synchronise data and minimise the risk of misinterpreting dietary orders.

The Hospital Authority (HA) has aligned the definition of the term DAT. It is now explicitly defined as a flexible dietary approach tailored to the patient's individual tolerance, preferences, and medical condition, subject to professional assessment. It does not imply any specific food texture.

CMC will implement the relevant recommendations to enhance medical and nursing staff training to ensure proper understanding and implementation of the aligned definition of the term concerned in daily practice. The hospital has met with the patient's family to explain the report's findings, and expressed deep condolences to the family members. CMC will maintain communication with the family and provide necessary assistance.

CMC has submitted the report to the HA Head Office. The hospital also expressed gratitude to the panel. Membership of the panel is as follows:

Chairperson:

Dr Lau Ka Hin

Clinical Stream Coordinator (Medical), Hong Kong East Cluster

Members:

Professor Chair Sek Ying

Vice-Director of Research, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong

Mr Chan Man Nok

Chief Nursing Officer, Nursing Services Department, Hospital Authority

Ms Sandy Chang

Cluster Manager (Dietetics), Kowloon Central Cluster

(Joined on March 6)

Dr Raymond Cheung

Chief Manager (Patient Safety and Risk Management), Hospital Authority

Mr Lam Yan Ki

Department Manager (Speech Therapy), Kowloon East Cluster

Dr Lau Chi Hung

Chief of Service (Surgery), Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Dr Ben Wong

Clinical Services Coordinator (Surgery), Caritas Medical Centre

Source: AI-generated images

Source: AI-generated images

HKSAR Government welcomes court's decision to dismiss Chow Hang Tung's application for judicial review on clothing policy for persons in custody

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government welcomes the judgment handed down by the Court of First Instance of the High Court today (January 13) to dismiss Chow Hang Tung's application for judicial review on the clothing policy for persons in custody (PICs).

The court judgment pointed out that the current clothing policy for PICs, including the requirement for female PICs to wear trousers in summer daytime, was formulated by the Correctional Services Department (CSD) as authorised by the Prison Rules. The Court was satisfied that the CSD had the expertise and experience in the relevant context, and that it had carefully considered various factors, taken into account of professional opinion when making the decision, as well as reviewed the policy continuously. The Court ruled that Chow Hang Tung had failed to demonstrate that the current policy constituted less favourable treatment of a particular gender. The Court pointed out that there was currently no factual evidence to support any assertion that there was widespread concern about the health effects of wearing trousers in summer. In addition, the rule was not absolute, but instead allowed individual PICs to apply for exceptional arrangements in special circumstances. At the same time, the Court also rejected Chow Hang Tung's assertion that she had requested to the CSD in July and August 2024 to wear shorts and had been refused.

A spokesman for the Security Bureau said, "The ruling of the Court of First Instance confirmed that the CSD's approach is reasonable, justified and lawful. According to Rule 26 of the Prison Rules, the CSD must provide every PIC with a uniform that meets a scale imposed by the Commissioner of Correctional Services. Over the years, the CSD had appointed task groups from time to time to review the clothing arrangements of PICs. These reviews gave ample consideration to numerous factors, including the type of correctional institutions, PICs' varying daily routines and activities involved, the need for thermal, physical and psychological comfort for PICs of different genders, privacy and decency of PICs and the security, good order and discipline of the prison, so as to continuously refine clothing arrangements according to the prevailing circumstances."

The spokesman stated, "Chow Hang Tung's assertion that she requested to wear shorts in summer and was rejected by the CSD is entirely inconsistent with the facts and was rejected by the Court. Besides, the current clothing policy for PICs already provides a degree of flexibility. For example, a PIC may make an application to wear other clothing on medical or non-medical grounds to the CSD, and the CSD would make appropriate arrangements having considered the actual circumstances and relevant factors."

The CSD will continue to impartially implement the relevant rules of the Prison Rules in accordance with the law and commit to providing a secure, safe, humane, decent and healthy custodial environment.

Source: AI-found images

Source: AI-found images

Recommended Articles