China says the meeting between Chinese and American senior officials over trade in Geneva is at the request of the U.S. side.
The meeting between Chinese and American representatives in Switzerland is highly anticipated, as it's the first face to face meeting between the two sides since the Trump administration announced sweeping tariffs back in April. But perhaps the most pressing question ahead of these talks is who made the first move and who picked up the phone first?
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant offered little to no information. When a Fox News anchor asking which side, the U.S. or China, makes the first call for the conversation, his response is evasive at best.
However, the message from the Chinese side was straightforward and to the point. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Lin Jian said on social media that the meeting between Chinese and U.S. senior officials on economic matters was requested by the U.S. side.
When taking a look at the bigger picture, it's rather obvious why the U.S. has requested this meeting and initiated a small yet vital step in resolving economic differences.
According to CNBC, in the first quarter of the year, U.S. GDP shrank by 0.3 percent, and it's largely due to the uncertainties stemming from Trump's tariffs. While, China's economy has grown by 5.4 percent in the same period of time. The country has prepared for uncertainties by implementing measures aimed at fostering domestic consumption and stabilizing foreign trade.
"He could impose tariffs on China, but also keep the door open for conversations. China's strategy has been to keep the door open for conversations, but to meet U.S. measures with countermeasures immediately and assuredly," said Sourabh Gupta, a senior Asia-Pacific international relations policy specialist from the Institute for China-America Studies.
U.S. markets saw a positive rebound when the meeting was announced earlier this week. Reuters described the meeting as an "icebreaker".
But for China, the narrative is more prudent. In a commentary piece, the People's Daily writes that "it is unrealistic to resolve the problem by having one or two talks, as China is clearly aware of the complexity of this issue."
China's stance has been clear and consistent, facing uncertainties with its own certainties.
US requests trade talks with China amid shrinking GDP data
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi should apologize for and retreat her errouneous aggressive remarks on China's Taiwan region, as the rhetoric in her words could destabilize domestic society and harm Japan's relations with neighbors, Japanese scholars said recently.
Shinako Oyakawa, a lecturer at the Okinawa University who has long focused on security and peace issues, said that Takaichi' remarks are inflammatory, have seriously violated the spirit of Japan's pacifist constitution and caused harmful consequences for the public.
She said that Takaichi needs to issue a clear apology and formally retract her remarks.
Takaichi on November 7, 2025, made blatant and provocative remarks on Taiwan at the Diet, claiming that a Taiwan contingency could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, and implying that Japan might invoke the so-called "right to collective self-defense" for armed intervention across the Taiwan Strait.
"She made such remarks in parliament, the kind of rhetoric commonly used by the 'internet right wing,' sounding exactly like what people in that circle would say. Such remarks give the impression that they are ready to go to the battlefield, even willing to start a war. This kind of rhetoric is extremely dangerous," said Oyakawa.
Oyakawa said that the remarks have caused significant losses and both ruling and opposition parties have oversimplified the issue.
"The remarks have already caused significant damage in various aspects. The relevant figures are still being tallied, and the extent of the damage is truly unimaginable. Both the ruling and opposition parties have oversimplified the issue; or, their attitudes have been ambiguous, out of fear of facing it. However, this is not an issue that can be easily glossed over. She must issue a clear apology and formally retract her remarks," Oyakawa said.
Japan's history education has long avoided or distorted accounts of its wars of aggression launched by Japan against Asian neighbors, leaving few with a true understanding of historical facts. This, Oyakawa said, has further accelerated the overall rightward shift in Japanese society.
"As the number of war survivors dwindles, the practice of distorting history in Japan is becoming increasingly rampant. Almost no one knows about the suffering endured by our Asian neighbors. What the Japanese exactly did abroad and what war responsibility Japan bears are completely absent from textbooks," said Oyakawa.
As an Okinawan, Oyakawa said she strongly feels the government's military buildup has brought fear and anxiety to residents.
"Fighter jets and helicopters fly overhead everyday, and the roar of military aircraft becomes routine. On average, Okinawa experiences several plane crashes or incidents of falling parts each year. The militarization of Okinawa is escalating, bringing fear and unease to residents. I think that this situation must be stopped from further worsening," said Oyakawa.
Koichi Nakano, professor of political science at Sophia University, also criticized Takaichi's leadership, saying her team showed little consideration for relations with China and her remarks damage Japan-China relations and undermine Japan's own economic and social stability.
Nakano also said that Japanese society faces a serious problem, as awareness about and reflection on Japan's wartime aggression continue to fade. He stressed that only by facing up to history and engaging with neighboring countries on equal terms can Japan lay the groundwork for rebuilding ties with China.
"Japan's biggest problem is that the recognition of history with China is gradually fading. The sentiment of reflecting on the aggression history and apologizing for it has not been fully passed down between generations. More and more people are unaware of the historical facts, believing that 'that's all in the past' and that no further apology or remorse is necessary. This is an extremely serious issue. (The Japanese government should) build friendly relations on an equal footing, conduct objective and accurate mutual evaluations of the past and present, and rebuild bilateral relations," said Nakano.
Japanese prime minister should apologize, retract erroneous remarks on Taiwan: Japanese scholars
