Karoline Leavitt uploads a cheerful Instagram snap, showing off her armful of popular Korean beauty products while tagging along with Trump in Korea. Her post goes viral, with fans calling her genuinely relatable. Comments gush: Thank you to this American girl for the free K-Beauty ad! Word is, sales of these brands tripled overnight.
Who’s Leavitt, anyway? She’s the White House Press Secretary, just 28 years old. As Trump puts it, “She's a star, and she's great. I don't think anybody has ever had a better press secretary than Karoline. She's been amazing.” Leavitt also made headlines for becoming the first U.S. government spokesperson to hit reporters with a cheeky “Your mom!” when asked a serious question.
Leavitt’s Korean honeymoon lasted all of three days. Suddenly, she’s under fire—not for another “mom” diss, but because her K-Beauty shopping spree was, apparently, too much. Angry voices thundered: Millions of Americans are still scrambling for their next meal, and you’re a White House bigshot flaunting your haul? Disgusting! Remember, Leavitt’s supposed to be a MAGA missionary—so the critics say, Hey, wasn’t it all about buying American? Why hype Korean brands? Of course, freedom-loving types jumped to her defense: She’s spending her own cash — what’s the problem? Still, it’s hard for some to swallow her snapping up so many high-value goodies abroad.
When “Shopping” Sends Political Shockwaves
Other voices chime in with more nuance: “It’s all Trump’s fault—his short-sighted trade war left no winners. U.S. prices keep climbing, so Leavitt, a White House official, jets off to Korea and snags budget K-Beauty products, while ordinary Americans are stuck with sky-high domestic prices. It’s miserable! Pay attention to how Americans actually feel.”
Former President Obama recently sounded alarm bells on social media: Over 47 million Americans are struggling with food insecurity, including a staggering 20% of children. His worry? The U.S. cost of living is spiraling, more families than ever are relying on relief, yet both major parties are locked in endless legal and political battles over aid. Obama warns: “Millions of kids, seniors, and low-income Americans will go hungry ahead of the holidays.”
Poverty Lines and Power Play
Poverty. It’s the first thing leaders should fix.
Let’s rewind a bit. Back at the start of Lunar New Year in 2021, on the eve of the Lantern Festival, China held a grand celebration. President Xi Jinping declared total victory in the nation’s fight against poverty—a feat he called a “miracle on earth.” When the BBC reported this, their tone was bittersweet. The stats quoted from Chinese officials were staggering: “All 98.99 million rural poor lifted out of poverty, all 832 impoverished counties delisted, all 128,000 poor villages off the map, and regional poverty solved.” The BBC then rolled out every metric and definition under the sun to analyze “poverty.”
But really, why try to read the Western mind? Forget it—let’s shift focus to Europe and America instead.
According to the BBC: “The UK will continue to see a big rise in the number of people living in poverty, a report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned. The study said 2.2 million children and two million working age adults were living in absolute poverty in 2009–10. In percentage terms, 17% of UK children were living in absolute poverty in 2009–10. By 2012–13, the IFS predicts this will rise to 21.8%.” The report further explains: It’s all in how you define poverty.
So, what about the United States? There, poverty is measured similarly. American scholars have written that if judged by the UN’s absolute poverty line standard, most Euro-American countries would not have a single poor person. Yet in reality, even America—the world's largest economy—officially recognizes about 17% of its population as poor.
So, why juggle numbers and tweak definitions just to spin a prettier picture for yourself? Start with public sentiment instead. “Leavitt’s K-Beauty episode” is enough to capture America today. Think back—would anyone have cared about White House officials bargain hunting in Korea during the 1990s dot-com heyday?
America’s poverty may need “scientific” measurement, but one fact is obvious: Americans feel poor enough to resent it — wow!
Deep Blue
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **
Zhuque has silenced America. SpaceX's repeated successes in rocket recovery drove home one point: American business works. And China? How could a feat achieved by marshaling the strength of an entire nation possibly compare with a private outfit pulling off a mission impossible?
Cast your mind back. The Clinton boom, built on the information superhighway, delivered four consecutive fiscal years of budget surplus. From 2015 onwards, SpaceX achieved rocket recovery, putting American commercial spaceflight at least a decade ahead of China. What more could anyone say? Behold the splendor of America's overall national power!
At 7:35 this morning, the reusable Zhuque-3 Y2 carrier rocket lifted off smoothly. Its builder is LandSpace, a Chinese commercial space company founded, coincidentally, in that very same year of 2015. The mission report reads: "About 137 seconds after liftoff, the first and second stages separated. The first stage then began its return sequence. After key maneuvers including high-altitude attitude adjustment, deceleration and aerodynamic gliding, it made a successful soft landing at the Gansu landing pad at 7:43. The flight test was a complete success."
A few points are worth adding. First, the Zhuque-3 Y1 made its maiden flight on December 3, 2025. It successfully delivered a satellite into its designated orbit, though its first-stage vertical recovery test failed.
Second, eight months on, Zhuque-3 has delivered on its mission, a task of major significance. Zhuque becomes our country's second reusable rocket after the Long March 10B.
Third, mind you, the Long March rockets belong to the "national team."
Fourth, China's state and commercial space programs are setting sail like "twin dragons out to sea." America is feeling the competitive pressure.
SpaceX has made a blockbuster stock market debut. The world is counting on America, following the internet, to lead the globe once more through space technology. The hope is a replay of the Clinton-era golden age. SpaceX pulled off the first successful recovery of a Falcon 9 rocket, then industrialized the technology. Today it launches the Falcon 9 around 150 times a year, roughly three times a week. A single booster can be reused dozens of times.
Yet even before the successful recovery of the Zhuque-3 Y2, American think tanks were already worried. China, doing things the Chinese way, has achieved recovery in both state-run and commercial spaceflight, with equally precise touchdown points. China's "catch-up" is no longer out of reach.
What deserves attention is this: China's state and commercial sectors are advancing in tandem, while NASA has widely adopted the commercial model. In return-to-the-Moon programs such as Artemis, NASA has contracted out uncrewed lunar landers, precursor satellite launches and even rocket servicing and replenishment support to multiple private space companies. Commercial players such as SpaceX, Firefly Aerospace and Rocket Lab are the mainstays.
Two years ago, analyses weighed the relative strengths of the Chinese and American space programs. Commentators argued that NASA's shift from "designing and building in-house" to "commercial contracting" would push national scientific talent out of front-line positions. Over the long run, that would weaken the state's "deep control and independent assessment capability" over space technology.
And if complex spaceflight life-support systems or new space station designs were left entirely to private leadership, NASA would face the twin hazards of technology and risk. Boeing's Starliner saga, which stranded two American astronauts on the International Space Station for a full nine months, is in its own way the same tune as today's USS Abraham Lincoln incident. Go figure.
The pair finally left the station "smoothly" aboard a SpaceX Dragon on March 18, 2025. They landed safely back on Earth the next day. Trump sang Musk's praises for a job well done.
A quick explainer: history has seen a so-called "Sputnik moment." In truth, it was a "Sputnik" crisis for America. In 1957, the Soviet Union successfully launched Sputnik 1, humanity's first artificial satellite. The phrase has since come to describe the turning point when a nation suddenly realizes it is lagging a rival in technology or a critical field. That realization triggers an acute sense of crisis and an urgent drive to catch up.
President Kennedy led America out of the Sputnik crisis with the Apollo lunar landing program. Today, can America build a crewed Mars program to overtake its rival? Musk, this round is all on you. Stop firing off low-orbit satellites like crazy to rake in cash. The day a crewed Mars landing succeeds will be the ultimate MAGA moment. Let's keep at it, together.
