Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Four Property Owners Fined Over $290,000 for Violating Building Ordinance in Hong Kong

HK

Four Property Owners Fined Over $290,000 for Violating Building Ordinance in Hong Kong
HK

HK

Four Property Owners Fined Over $290,000 for Violating Building Ordinance in Hong Kong

2025-12-05 11:00 Last Updated At:11:08

Four property owners fined over $290,000 for not complying with statutory orders

​Four owners were convicted and fined $290,630 in total at the Kowloon City Magistrates' Courts on December 3 for failing to comply with statutory orders issued under the Buildings Ordinance (BO) (Cap. 123).

The first case involved a metal frame on and over a canopy at the common area of an industrial building on Castle Peak Road, Sham Shui Po. As the unauthorised building works (UBWs) were carried out without prior approval and consent from the Buildings Department (BD), a removal order was served on the owner under section 24(1) of the BO. Failing to comply with the removal order, the owner was prosecuted by the BD and was convicted and fined $89,080 in total, of which $83,080 was the fine for the number of days that the offence continued.

The second case involved a flat roof structure with an area of about 11.5 square meters of a composite building on Reclamation Street, Mong Kok. As the UBWs were carried out without prior approval and consent from the BD, a removal order was served on the owner under section 24(1) of the BO. Failing to comply with the removal order, the owner was prosecuted by the BD and was convicted and fined $74,590 in total, of which $64,590 was the fine for the number of days that the offence continued.

The third case involved an alteration of a mini-storage unit in an industrial building on Bute Street, Mong Kok. As the alteration and addition works obstructed the means of escape and means of access for fire fighting and rescue, contravening the Building (Planning) Regulations, a removal order and a repair order were served on the owner under section 24(1) and section 26 of the BO respectively. Failing to comply with the statutory orders, the owner was prosecuted by the BD and was convicted and fined $69,760 in total, of which $57,760 was the fine for the number of days that the offence continued.

The fourth case involved alteration of protected lobby at the front staircase of two composite buildings on Sai Yeung Choi Street South, Mong Kok. As the alteration works affected the fire-resisting construction of the buildings, contravening the Building (Construction) Regulation, two removal orders were served on the owner under section 24(1) of the BO. Failing to comply with the removal orders, the owner was prosecuted by the BD and was convicted and fined $57,200 in total, of which $48,200 was the fine for the number of days that the offence continued.

A spokesman for the BD said today (December 5), "UBWs, including the unauthorised alterations causing obstruction to the means of escape and means of access for firefighting and rescue, or affecting the fire-resisting construction of a building, may lead to serious consequences. Owners must comply with removal orders without delay. The BD will continue to take enforcement action against owners who fail to comply with removal orders, including instigation of prosecution, to ensure building and public safety."

Failure to comply with a removal order without reasonable excuse is a serious offence under the BO. The maximum penalty upon conviction is a fine of $200,000 and one year's imprisonment, and a further fine of up to $20,000 for each day that the offence continues. Moreover, failure to comply with a repair order without reasonable excuse is also a serious offence. The maximum penalty upon conviction is a fine of level 5 ($50,000 at present) and one year's imprisonment, and a further fine of up to $5,000 for each day that the offence continues.

Remarks by SHYA and SLW at media session regarding follow-up work on fire at Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po

​The Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs, Miss Alice Mak, and the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Mr Chris Sun, met the media today (December 6) regarding the follow-up work on the fire at Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po, after attending a radio programme. Following are their remarks at the media session:

Reporter: Miss Mak, right now the funds are being used for immediate relief. How does the Government plan to ensure that funds allocated for the fire victims are used effectively in the long term to help them rebuild their lives? Are there any specific schemes or initiatives being developed to assist affected families? And how will the funds be allocated toward long-term housing solutions? And in terms of scaffold netting, how will the authorities help those who are unable to meet the deadline by today? Mr Sun, what specific penalties do you foresee for companies or workers who violate the proposed smoking ban that comes into effect?

Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs: For the Support Fund ("Support Fund for Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po"), right now we have already raised a total of $3 billion from the private sector and also from the Government's allocation fund. We hope we will make the best use of this Support Fund to help our residents being affected in this fire incident. As you know, we have already launched several relief funds to cater for their short-term needs. We will also make the best use of the Support Fund to provide long-term and sustainable support and assistance to those residents to help them rebuild their homes and let their lives resume normal.

Secretary for Labour and Welfare: Thank you. On the prohibition of smoking at construction sites, of course, it's subject to a discussion with the Legislative Council (LegCo) upon its establishment next year, on January 1. One of the issues we have to discuss is about if the consensus among the LegCo and the administration is to prohibit smoking at construction sites in general, we have to consider what kind of penalty we have to put in place.

One of the possible options we could explore is possibly a fixed ticket, so this is one of the ideas we need to explore. But of course, the detailed proposal is to be hammered out after discussions with LegCo and also we're going to consult the trade to make sure that whatever new prohibition is going to be introduced, it is enforceable. Thank you.

(Please also refer to the Chinese portion of the remarks.)

Source: AI-found images

Source: AI-found images

Recommended Articles