New poverty strategy cancels poverty line for a more targeted grouping

Hong Kong’s poverty line has taken a new twist. There is no longer an assessment of those living below the poverty line, but rather a targeted poverty alleviation strategy.

Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Chris Sun Yuk-Han explained that the poverty line was a very statistical concept that was purely based on income but failed to capture the full scope of need within the community.

In the past, the poverty line was based on 50 per cent of median household income. Currently, that is HK$30,000 for a four-person household or about $10,300 for a single-person household.

Hong Kong’s poverty rate affects more than 1.4 million residents, with significant variations across districts and age groups. Elderly citizens face the highest poverty risk at nearly 45 per cent, while districts like Sham Shui Po and Kwun Tong show concentrated disadvantages.

Government intervention, such as Old Age Living Allowance, reduces the poverty rate from 23.6 per cent to 14.9 per cent after policy measures, highlighting both the scale of need and the impact of social programs on vulnerable populations.

Regionally, Singapore reports a poverty rate around 10 per cent using comparable methodology, Japan’s relative poverty rate reaches 15.7 per cent, and South Korea shows 16.7 per cent. Taiwan registers about 11 per cent.

After dropping the use of the poverty line, the government adopted a new 21-indicator framework on a 227-page Targeted Poverty Alleviation Strategy Report, which identifies the most vulnerable groups and for the first time assess the “social transfer value covering income, employment, assets, reliance on cash welfare, housing, education or training access, and physical health or social connectivity, to identify the city’s neediest groups.

The combined size of three groups identified by the report totalled 1.13 million people across 667,000 households, with the data measured over different years and some individuals belonging to more than one group.

The recognition of health carers in the report is particularly significant, as they often provide essential support without formal compensation. Their inclusion in the expanded assessment framework indicates a growing awareness of their crucial role in society and the potential need for targeted assistance to alleviate their burdens.

Chief Secretary for Administration, Eric Chan Kwok-ki, as chairman of the Commission on Poverty (CoP) has been quoted as saying that by adopting several innovative elements in the report, the CoP seeks to present how the Government's allocation of resources improves the living standards of beneficiary households, so that the public could better perceive the direct relevance between the policies and their own interests. For example, he said, this is the first time that the internationally recognized concept of "social transfer values" was adopted to quantify the social resources transferred to households that benefit from regular housing, health, education, and welfare measures. Such an analysis would reflect in a more comprehensive manner the Government's efforts and effectiveness in alleviating poverty.

A “Pilot Programme on Community Living Room” provides additional living spaces and support services for “sub divided unit” (SDU) households.

The CoP identified three target groups SDU households, single-parent households and elders-only households.

The strategy also encompasses a number of programmes for targeted groups. A “Strive and Rise Programme” focuses on supporting secondary students from underprivileged families particularly those residing in sub divided units (SDUs) to lift them out of intergenerational poverty. The “Teen for a Brighter Future” programme, for example, provides for a school-based after school care service scheme enabling primary students, especially from single parent households to stay at school after school hours to receive supervised care and academic support in familiar and safe environment. This alleviates parenting pressures and facilitates parents to seek employment. For example, a child whose education from kindergarten to university would be subsidized to $2.5 million. It is the first time the government has adopted the international concept of “social transfer values” and measures how much income a family gained by not having to pay full price for public services.

Another reason why the CoP dropped the poverty line indicator was that Hong Kong was now entering a “very ageing society” in which most elderly people no longer earned an income.

Recognizing elders-only households often lack support and attention, CoP says it supports Government’s engagement of Care Teams to visit elderly singletons, doubletons, and three-person-and-above elderly households and refer cases in need to social welfare service units.

However, the success of this new strategy depends on three main elements: accurate implementation—making sure resources reach the intended groups; ongoing monitoring—developing an alternative, comprehensive assessment mechanism to track overall poverty trends; and sustained commitment—maintaining long-term collaboration among government, businesses, and citizens. If implemented effectively, this strategy could create a more holistic and compassionate poverty alleviation system for Hong Kong, shifting from "distributing money to the poor" to "empowering people to escape poverty", thereby maximising the social benefits of limited resources.

Mark Pinkstone

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

The continued success of Hong Kong over the years can be attributed to one fact: it’s low and simple tax system. It has always been a major selling point to woo expatriate experts to Hong Kong to drive its financial and other services to be competitive with world markets.

US doomsday prophet Stephen Roach was quick to point out that thousands left Hong Kong during the COVID pandemic in 2020. But he has failed to mention the thousands that have returned since that dark period, which, according to US financial media giant Bloomberg, are responding to a booming initial public offering market, planned tax breaks for private equity and hedge funds, and a more vibrant city.

Bloomberg provided its financial clients worldwide with an in-depth feature on Hong Kong as it is today. Titled “Finance Expats Flock Back to Hong Kong Seeking Low Taxes, Better Jobs”, the 2,500-word article cited expatriates who had left and returned saying that although the cost of living in Hong Kong was relatively high, the tax relief outweighed these costs.

Hong Kong’s tax is simple. It is divided into three categories – individual, business and property owners. For individuals the standard tax rate is 15 per cent, for businesses, a two-tiered profits tax applies – 8.25 per cent of the first HK$2 million and 16.5 per cent thereafter – and property tax is 15 per cent of net assessable value. There is also an ad valorem stamp duty on property transactions ranging from $100 on property under $4 million to 4.25 per cent on property exceeding $27.39 million. Transactions exceeding $100 million hit a rate of 6.5 per cent duty.

There is no sales tax (save for tobacco and alcohol), VAT, withholding tax, capital gains tax, estate tax or dividend tax. The global average for sales tax is 13.7 per cent and the Asian average is 9.6 per cent.

Bloomberg noted that there were 31,278 employment visa approvals last year, more than double the number five years ago, with many going to nationals from Japan, South Korea and the UK. In financial services, some 2,343 visas issued to foreigners rose by 17 per cent last year to the highest since 2022.

While the sustainability of the influx may hinge on the strength of the IPO market, global financial firms including Bank of America and HSBC Holdings are among those signalling confidence in Hong Kong. Many new high-rise office blocks which saw low occupancy rates a few years ago are now reporting almost full capacity, another indicator of confidence in the business sector. Bloomberg said Hong Kong is aggressively promoting the city’s low taxes and comparative lack of red tape to the world’s ultra-rich business owners and money managers.

Hong Kong and Singapore rank third and fourth behind New York and London in the latest Global Financial Centres Index. Singapore’s tax rate is similar to Hong Kong (15 per cent for eexpatriates,4 per cent for director’s fees, and 17 per cent flat rate for corporations). A number of individuals and corporations fled to Singapore during the pandemic, but with Hong Kong fast becoming the financial hub of Asia, many are now returning, causing the Singapore Monetary Authority to entice investment firms to stay by cutting their taxes.

With neighbouring countries upping their incentives to woo the investment firms and experts, Hong Kong is keeping ahead of its competitors by eliminating the tax on hedge fund profits and plans to promote the development of Corporate Treasury Centres (CTCs). The tiered tax regime proposed is precisely designed to address the main points of the industry in a targeted manner, providing eligible corporations with more comprehensive tax benefits, greater tax certainty, and enhanced compliance flexibility. The government will also revamp the existing tax concession regime applicable to corporate treasury activities and introduce a more competitive tiered system. These measures include refining the existing concession regime and introducing a pre-approval mechanism. Pre-approved CTCs and their pre-approved associated companies will enjoy more favourable tax benefits, greater tax certainty and enhanced compliance flexibility.

These innovative, pragmatic, and competitive measures are expected to attract more multinational corporations from different regions and sectors to make full use of Hong Kong's role as a platform with the new catch phrase of 'bringing in and going global', and to bring their funds and core business to Hong Kong for centralized management, thereby strengthening Hong Kong's position as a major base for CTCs.

In June the government announced that with immediate effect, tax on the profits of hedge funds would be eliminated. By removing taxes on performance income, which are typically levied on profits generated from investment strategies, the city aims to create a more attractive environment for hedge fund operations. By eliminating the tax burden on performance income, Hong Kong is positioning itself as a favourable jurisdiction for hedge funds seeking to maximize their profitability. Industry experts predict that this policy change could lead to an influx of hedge funds relocating to Hong Kong, as fund managers look for jurisdictions that offer more favourable tax regimes.

Hong Kong’s long-standing policy of a low tax regime has been the magnet to draw the best of the best to its shores and invest in its future as a leading global financial centre.