LONDON (AP) — A satirical dystopian novel whose themes of “catastrophe and apocalypse” chime with our uneasy times won the Booker Prize on Monday, the first work of science fiction to take the prestigious literary award.
British writer M. John Harrison was awarded the 50,000-pound ($67,000) prize at a ceremony in London for “The End of Everything,” a book the judges said combines “huge ambition” and “extraordinary, expert writing.”
Click to Gallery
M. John Harrison, author of "The End of Everything" holds the trophy for winning the Booker Prize during the Booker Prize 2026 ceremony at Old Billingsgate in London, Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2026.(AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
Luke Kennard, author of "Black Bag" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026.(AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
M. John Harrison, author of "The End of Everything" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Rebecca Perry, author of "May We Feed the King" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Elizabeth Strout, author of "The Things We Never Say" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Douglas Stuart, author of "John of John" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Marlon James, author of "The Disappearers" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Harrison beat five other finalists including previous winners Douglas Stuart and Marlon James, who had been the oddsmakers’ favorites, and Pulitzer Prize laureate Elizabeth Strout.
“The End of Everything” is set on England’s Channel coast in the near future, after an unspecified calamity has shattered society and brought an influx of enigmatic alien entities to Britain. It centers on a beachcomber who lives with his gun-toting aunt and discovers a puzzling, shape-shifting artifact on the shore.
Asked what he wanted to convey to readers, Harrison said: “It's a grim world, and it'll keep on being grim. And it's weird. But at the end of things there may be some kind of — I wouldn't say hope, or closure, but there might be some kind of relief.”
Critics have praised the book's dark humor, though some have been confused by its elusive narrative.
Historian Mary Beard, who chaired the judging panel, said the book is “the politics of now seen through the lens of the future,” and about a society “undergoing a catastrophe that they don’t really understand.”
“What he does is to say, when the catastrophe comes, you won’t know what’s happening,” Beard said. “And there are bits where you, the reader, are with the characters in not fully understanding. Now, I think that’s fantastically exciting.”
Harrison’s work includes large dollops of fantasy and speculative fiction, and he won the Arthur C. Clarke science fiction award for a previous novel, “Nova Swing.” Although borders between publishing genres are increasingly blurred, it’s still rare for a work of sci-fi to win a major literary prize.
Harrison said before he won that he had been “working for 40 to 50 years to shift the balance, both as a novelist and as a critic. Why shouldn’t a well-written (work of science fiction) be considered to be literary fiction?”
Booker Prize Foundation chief executive Gaby Wood noted that the prize has removed references to “literary fiction” from its materials, because “all fiction is literary.”
Beard said Harrison’s win was “recognition of what some people would see as the blindingly obvious, that you find great books in every genre.”
Founded in 1969, the Booker Prize is open to English-language novels from any country published in the U.K. and Ireland and has a reputation for transforming writers’ careers.
Its winners have included Salman Rushdie, Ian McEwan and Arundhati Roy. Last year’s winner was “Flesh” by Hungarian-British writer David Szalay.
Harrison, 81, is the oldest writer to win the Booker, two years older than Margaret Atwood when she won in 2019. “The End of Everything” is his 13th novel. But Beard said the prize was definitely “not a lifetime achievement award.”
“We thought this was a book that had earned it,” Beard said.
She said the judges, who included poet Raymond Antrobus and singer Jarvis Cocker from the band Pulp, met for four or five hours to pick a winner, and the choice was ultimately unanimous.
“There was a lot of discussion and disagreement and debate, but nobody stomped off,” she said.
M. John Harrison, author of "The End of Everything" holds the trophy for winning the Booker Prize during the Booker Prize 2026 ceremony at Old Billingsgate in London, Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2026.(AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
Luke Kennard, author of "Black Bag" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026.(AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
M. John Harrison, author of "The End of Everything" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Rebecca Perry, author of "May We Feed the King" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Elizabeth Strout, author of "The Things We Never Say" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Douglas Stuart, author of "John of John" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
Marlon James, author of "The Disappearers" poses for a photograph during a photocall for the 6 shortlisted authors for the Booker Prize, in London, Sunday, Nov. 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
WASHINGTON (AP) — Rep. Thomas Massie moved Monday to force a vote to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, pressing his fellow Republicans to remove one of the Trump administration's most prominent figures following sweeping election losses blamed in part on fallout from the war in Iran.
Massie, a Kentucky Republican, read the impeachment resolution from the House floor just hours after it opened for the first day of sessions after the midterms. It largely focuses on the war in Iran but also includes references to Hegseth’s role in carrying out military actions in Yemen and Venezuela.
The congressman, who was defeated by a Trump-backed challenger in a primary earlier this year, said Hegseth's actions amounted to “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Hegseth, he said, “knowingly executed and implemented unlawful orders” and “remains a threat to the Constitution.”
President Donald Trump lashed out at Massie personally just hours after the congressman read the resolution, calling him a “loser” who “has a lot of hatred in his heart.”
A vote in the House could come by mid-week, but next steps are highly uncertain. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries supports the measure. If most Democrats follow him, Massie would only need support from a few Republicans to impeach Hegseth.
If the House votes to impeach, it would fall to to the Senate to either dismiss the charges or hold a trial. Republicans remain in the majority in both chambers, until the new Congress convenes in January with Democrats in control.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, endorsed the impeachment push. "Hegseth must stand trial before the Senate," he said.
Republican leaders, who are eager to use their final weeks in power executing their own agenda, expressed frustration at the move. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has tried to prevent the vote, said impeachment “in the middle of hostilities abroad would be a terrible, terrible look, a terrible thing for our allies and our enemies to see that.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he wasn’t sure why the vote was being held now.
“We’ll see what their ultimate decision is over there,” he said of the House. “We’ll have to deal with it accordingly here."
Hegseth is stepping up his public statements ahead of the vote, telling reporters that he's eager to defend the military actions that he and Trump have taken against Iran, Yemen's Iranian-backed Houthi rebels and Venezuela's previous leaders.
After giving a speech at the Naval War College in Rhode Island, he brushed aside the impeachment push.
“There’s a lot of politically motivated people who may have substantial policy disagreements, but their disagreements are with success,” he told reporters. He added that “if we want to litigate” the military actions that the Trump administration has taken, “I’m happy to do it all day long.”
Asked about Vice President JD Vance blaming the Iran war for the massive GOP losses in the election, Hegseth noted that Trump said he would do it again, and “I agree.”
Hegseth also announced that he would hold a rare news conference on Tuesday — his first in over 180 days — on the impeachment threat.
Hegseth argued that the war was necessary because “someone had to confront the Iranian regime’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon” and said “the choice was don’t act and wish it away or take a bold move."
Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran has 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium that is enriched up to 60% purity, a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Trump defended Hegseth to reporters on Monday, commending him for having “won the war” in Venezuela and “winning the war” in Iran, which continues to drag on.
Hegseth reiterated that “Iran is devastated,” even though the Islamic Republic has been able to keep striking military bases in the Middle East that are used by the United States, causing billions of dollars in damage, as well as commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Disruptions to shipping in the waterway, where one-fifth of the world's oil passed before the war, have led to higher energy prices that hit voters' pocketbooks.
Hegseth's defense of the war comes after about 6 in 10 voters said the U.S. made the “wrong decision” in taking military action against Iran, according to The AP Voter Poll, a survey of more than 100,000 voters in the United States.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended his fellow Cabinet secretary, saying that he believes Hegesth has been doing “a great job” and that its unfair that a Republican is pushing the impeachment effort.
“I work with him. And so I see perhaps a side of him that the media doesn’t see and members of Congress may not see,” Rubio told reporters at the Group of Seven industrialized democracies gathering in Paris. “But I think Pete works really hard. He’s incredibly smart.”
Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Lisa Mascaro, Joey Cappelletti and Farnoush Amiri contributed to this report.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth leaves after attending the Association of Southeast Asian Nations' Defense Ministers' Meeting in Cebu, central Philippines, Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2026, (AP Photo/Aaron Favila, Pool)