Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Trump’s tariffs aim to return manufacturing jobs to US but workers show little interest

China

China

China

Trump’s tariffs aim to return manufacturing jobs to US but workers show little interest

2025-05-20 01:02 Last Updated At:09:07

U.S. President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs are partly aimed at restoring American manufacturing prowess, harking back to a time when some of the world's most famous products were produced in the United States, but workers show little interest.

The American manufacturing story has deep roots in history. For instance, the ten millionth Model T Ford rolling off the assembly line in 1924 is one of the most iconic moments in American industrial history.

But over time, much of that production has been outsourced overseas in return for cheaper products, leading to widespread industrial decline in places like the Midwest.

U.S. presidents have regularly visited the former industrial heartlands of America, pledging to restore a "golden age" in the American economy.

But Donald Trump says this time it's different. Trump's sweeping tariffs are aimed at protecting American jobs from cheaper foreign competition and incentivizing both U.S. firms and foreign competitors to make their products in the U.S.

But with around half-a-million manufacturing job openings unfilled even before Trump launched his trade war, a major question remains: Do people in the U.S. actually want to work in manufacturing? Not all of them says yes.

There were 449,000 manufacturing job openings in the United States in March 2025 and, while a survey by the CATO Institute found that about 80 percent of Americans thought the U.S. would prosper from manufacturing jobs, only a quarter wanted to do that kind of work themselves.

When asked whether they would consider a career in manufacturing, some people in Washington D.C. gave their responses.

Geraleene Jamieson Shirley, a bank worker from Jamaica, said she won't consider it. "Because I'm not necessarily good at those things," she said.

"I wish I could do that, but it's just not really in my skill set. Maybe if I was trained at a younger age I could," said Pete Stewart from Scotland.

However, Brian Gougherty, a salesman from Detroit, expressed a different view.

"We're very proud of our president for bringing back manufacturing. I grew up in Detroit, Michigan. My father worked for Ford Motor Company for 31 years. So I know what Detroit was and still can be because those factories are still there," he said.

While some believe in the so-called "re-shoring movement", many companies say it's not viable to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. on the scale the Trump Administration wants.

Trump touted electrical goods producer Whirlpool as a beneficiary of his tariffs during his first presidency.

Yet a study by the International Trade Commission found that Trump's so-called washing machine tariffs cost taxpayers 800,000 dollars for every job created and raised consumer prices.

And while Whirlpool has said it hopes Trump's tariffs this time around will help, it also acknowledged they contributed to disappointing first quarter results.

Whether the tariffs will truly deliver on the promise of a manufacturing renaissance still remains to be seen.

Trump’s tariffs aim to return manufacturing jobs to US but workers show little interest

Trump’s tariffs aim to return manufacturing jobs to US but workers show little interest

The Republic of Korea (ROK)'s former impeached President Yoon Suk-yeol on Friday was sentenced to five years in prison on arrest obstruction charges.

The criminal division of the Seoul Central District Court in charge of Yoon's obstruction of justice case handed down the prison sentence to Yoon for abusing the presidential security service to hinder the anti-corruption agency from executing its arrest warrant in January 2025.

The Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) was once thwarted in its attempt to arrest Yoon as the presidential security service formed human shields and bus blockades to prevent investigators from entering the presidential residence.

The team of Cho Eun-suk, an independent counsel who led investigations into Yoon's insurrection and other charges, demanded a 10-year prison term for Yoon.

The court said Yoon privatized the presidential security service for personal safety and private interests by blocking the law enforcement agencies' lawful execution of an arrest warrant and attempting to destroy evidence, pointing out that despite the very bad nature of his crime, he consistently offered unconvincing excuses and showed no remorse.

The court stressed that severe punishment was necessary, considering the need to restore the rule of law damaged by Yoon's crime, but it noted that the fact that he was a first-time offender with no criminal record was considered a favorable factor.

The sentencing, which was broadcast live, was Yoon's first verdict coming from his botched martial law bid.

The first-instance sentencing for Yoon's insurrection charges was scheduled for Feb 19. The special counsel sought a death penalty for Yoon on the charges.

Yoon declared emergency martial law on the night of Dec 3 in 2024, but it was revoked hours later by the National Assembly.

The constitutional court upheld a motion to impeach Yoon in April 2025, officially removing him from office.

The ousted leader was indicted while in detention in January 2025 on charges of leading an insurrection, becoming the first sitting ROK president facing such prosecution.

ROK ex-president Yoon sentenced to 5 years in prison on arrest obstruction charges

ROK ex-president Yoon sentenced to 5 years in prison on arrest obstruction charges

ROK ex-president Yoon sentenced to 5 years in prison on arrest obstruction charges

ROK ex-president Yoon sentenced to 5 years in prison on arrest obstruction charges

Recommended Articles