Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Getting the Five “Musts” Right to Navigate the Century's Great transformation

Blog

Getting the Five “Musts” Right to Navigate the Century's Great transformation
Blog

Blog

Getting the Five “Musts” Right to Navigate the Century's Great transformation

2025-06-22 18:37 Last Updated At:18:37

The Hong Kong National Security Law (NSL) has been implemented for five years now. Looking back at the chaos of 2019 and the enactment of the Hong Kong National Security Law in 2020, which had an immediate stabilising effect, it feels like a lifetime ago.

In his speech at the forum marking the fifth anniversary of the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, Xia Baolong, Director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office, mentioned that the Hong Kong National Security Law holds milestone significance in the development of "one country, two systems" in Hong Kong. As the US-China struggle intensifies and reaches fever pitch, Director Xia noted that the current century's momentous transformation is accelerating, and Hong Kong's internal and external environment is undergoing profound changes. We must be guided by the "holistic approach to national security" to provide strong security guarantees for achieving Hong Kong's better development. The focus should be on grasping the following five “musts”:

First, we must integrate safeguarding national security throughout the entire process of implementing "one country, two systems".

There is a view in society that since Beijing now talks about the transition "from chaos to order", we no longer need to keep talking about national security every day.

Director Xia comprehensively refuted these views, stating that safeguarding national security will accompany the entire process of implementing "one country, two systems". He reminded everyone never to think that Hong Kong is now perfectly fine and no longer needs to safeguard national security. He said we must clearly see that anti-China, anti-Hong Kong elements have not given up their malicious intentions, with various forms of "soft resistance" constantly emerging in new ways, and external hostile forces have never stopped interfering in Hong Kong. The struggles against infiltration, subversion, and separatism have not ended. Some people with ill intentions fabricate fallacies to mislead people, such as "pan-NSL", claiming that the Hong Kong National Security Law undermines human rights and freedoms, and assertions that having the Hong Kong National Security Law means there is no "one country, two systems". In response, everyone must keep their eyes open, recognise the essence of its true  intention, and resolutely fight against this.

After listening to Director Xia's first point, I marked the phrase "entire process" – meaning it will never stop, to cope with the extremely complex and severe external situation.

Second, we must ensure that the governance of the Special Administrative Region remains firmly in the hands of patriots.

There are also some views in society suggesting that political stability has now been achieved, political reform can be restarted, and the government should tolerate more intense opposition voices.

But Director Xia pointed in a different direction, saying that if we cannot ensure national political security, and if the governance of the Special Administrative Region cannot be held in the hands of patriots, Hong Kong's prosperity and stability would be out of the question, and safeguarding national security would be empty talk. On this fundamental question of principle, we must maintain firm positions and clear-cut stands, never wavering at any time.

After listerning to Director Xia's second point, the words "regime security" marks in my heart: if the SAR's governance is not in the hands of patriots, it would threaten Beijing's regime. This is a new formulation, and the "35+ subversion case" is a good example.

Third, we must remain unwavering in both safeguarding security and promoting development.

There is a fallacious argument in society that now we are transitioning "from governance to prosperity", yet engaging in so many national security matters is detrimental to the economy.

Director Xia completely disagreed with this argument, believing that national security and development are related to each other and actually work hand in hand. He specifically quoted President Xi Jinping's emphasis that "security is the prerequisite for development, development is the guarantee of security, and we must remain unwavering in both safeguarding security and promoting development". Safeguarding national security is for Hong Kong's better development, to let Hong Kong people live better lives, and to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of foreign investors.

After listening to Director Xia's third point, I noted these words: "remain unwavering in both security and development". Director Xia has previously said that while business knows no borders, businesspeople have a homeland – the business community must never do anything that harms national security and interests while pursuing development.

Fourth, we must effectively protect the human rights and freedoms of Hong Kong residents.

Some people in society say the Hong Kong National Security Law has affected Hong Kong people's freedoms.

Director Xia sternly refuted this, pointing out that during the "extradition bill turmoil", ordinary citizens didn't even dare to walk the streets – what freedom was there? Speaking Putonghua in public places could result in being beaten – what human rights were there?

The Hong Kong National Security Law stipulates a comprehensive human rights protection system, reasonably balancing national security with human rights and freedoms, and implementing the principles of upholding the rule of law and respecting and protecting human rights throughout the legal provisions and implementation process. Over the five years since the Hong Kong National Security Law's implementation, it has only targeted an extremely small number of criminals who seriously endanger national security, while protecting the human rights and freedoms of all Hong Kong residents, including those of foreign friends in Hong Kong.

The key to Director Xia's fourth point lies in the two words: "reasonable balance".

Fifth, we must maintain Hong Kong's unique position and advantages.

Some people say that after the enactment of the Hong Kong National Security Law, foreign businesses dare not come to Hong Kong.

Director Xia said that under "one country, two systems" conditions, safeguarding national security makes Hong Kong more open and more free. Normal international exchanges not only do not violate the Hong Kong National Security Law but are protected by it. Safeguarding national security helps leverage Hong Kong's unique advantage of "backing of the motherland and connecting with the world", helps consolidate Hong Kong's highly free and open business environment, and helps deepen international exchanges and cooperation. This will surely make Hong Kong's door of openness wider and wider, and its international influence and competitiveness stronger and stronger. He even quoted senior executives from major multinational banks saying that China is becoming a key node in the rebalancing of global supply chains and economic power, while Hong Kong is the main bridge connecting mainland China with the world, its unique position and advantages will be further consolidated.

Director Xia's emphasis on "maintaining Hong Kong's unique position" is particularly impressive.

Beyond the five “musts”, Director Xia elevated the practice of the Hong Kong National Security Law to a theoretical level, pointing out that Hong Kong implements the holistic approach to national security, using high-level security to escort high-quality development. The key to the holistic approach to national security lies in "holistic", highlighting the concept of comprehensive security that covers both traditional and non-traditional security fields.

The five years of practice under the Hong Kong National Security Law show that under the international circumstances of sustained US pressure on China, this law is not one that restricts Hong Kong people's freedoms, but rather one that protects Hong Kong and the nation. Hong Kong is no longer a soft underbelly for foreign attacks on China, no longer a victim of colour revolutions.

 Lo Wing-hung




Bastille Commentary

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

The Middle East is once again engulfed in the familiar chaos of war, but this time there's a particularly bitter irony at play. Israel's surprise strikes on Iran, taking out two top military brass and a bunch of nuclear scientists, followed by Iran's predictable missile retaliation, has left Tehran in a pretty dire spot. Meanwhile, Trump's sitting on the fence, probably enjoying the drama while deciding whether to let loose those massive B-2 bombers with their bunker-busting toys on Iran's underground nuclear facilities.

But here's the thing that's really grinding my gears about this whole mess – Iran's current predicament isn't just bad luck or superior Israeli firepower. It's the direct result of decades of misguided pro-American thinking that's left them vulnerable when it matters most.

Missing the Chinese Fighter Jet Express

Let's start with the most glaring military blunder. Iran's air force is still flying around in American F-14A Tomcats from the Shah's era – we're talking about jets that are pushing 50 years old. With US sanctions making spare parts rarer than hen's teeth, these aging birds are supposed to face off against Israel's shiny new F-35I stealth fighters. It's like bringing a musket to a gunfight.

Now, here's where it gets interesting. Remember when Pakistan's Chinese J-10CE fighters made headlines by downing Indian Rafales with those nifty PL-15 missiles? That same J-10 fighter was on offer to Iran way back in 2008 at the Zhuhai Airshow. Pakistan grabbed the opportunity, but Iran? They turned their noses up at it.

The Western media back then was having a field day dismissing Chinese military tech. The Wall Street Journal was busy calling China's air show a "public performance" and claiming their jets had "over 50 problems". Guess what? Those same Western "experts" who said China wasn't a real military superpower are now watching Chinese sixth-generation fighters take to the skies while America's still stuck with PowerPoint presentations.

The Pro-American Trap That Never Pays Off

But the military hardware is just part of the story. Iran's real problem runs deeper – it's got a chronic case of wanting to please America, despite getting nothing but hostility in return. The country's political scene has been this endless ping-pong match between hardliners and pro-American moderates, with the latter constantly promising that if they just bow low enough, Uncle Sam might throw them a bone.

Take the current president, Pezeshkian, who's firmly in the pro-American camp. The guy probably thought he could sweet-talk his way into better relations with Washington. But as I've been saying for years, it doesn't matter how pro-American you are if America doesn't want you to be pro-American – especially when Israel's got a say in the matter.

The suspicious helicopter crash that took out hardliner President Raisi in 2024? That timing was awfully convenient for those who wanted a more pliable leader in Tehran. But being pliable hasn't exactly worked out, has it?

When Weakness Invites Aggression

Here's the brutal reality that pro-American Iranian politicians refuse to acknowledge: the more you signal weakness and desperation for American approval, the more you paint a target on your back. Netanyahu didn't accidentally time his airstrikes for when US-Iran talks were heating up – he did it because he knew Iran's divided house would struggle to respond effectively.

The fact that Israeli intelligence could pinpoint those two generals suggests Iran's got serious internal security problems. When you've got that many people internally hoping for American approval, some of them are bound to be sharing more than just political opinions with foreign intelligence services.

As Xia Baolong brilliantly put it during Hong Kong's National Security Education Day: "America cannot stand to see Hong Kong prosper... If anyone thinks they can beg America for mercy in exchange for peace, this is extremely naive. Betraying the motherland will not lead to a good outcome."

Iran's tragedy is a perfect case study in this dynamic. They've spent decades trying to prove they're worthy of American friendship, only to find themselves more isolated and vulnerable than ever. The cruel irony is that their attempts to appear reasonable and moderate have only made them look weak to their enemies and unreliable to potential allies.

The lesson here isn't just for Iran – it's for any country that thinks kowtowing to Washington is a viable long-term strategy. Sometimes the best way to earn respect is to stop begging for it.

Lo Wing-hung

Recommended Articles