So, France calls it a "Dark Day". French Prime Minister François Bayrou didn’t hold back this year when the so-called “framework” trade agreement was inked between Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump. “It is a dark day,” he said, “when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission.” And frankly, it’s hard to disagree. The new deal means the Europeans will pump a staggering $600billion investments into US, throw another $750billion at the US energy sector, and—just in case that wasn’t enough—America slaps on a juicy 15% tariff on European exports.
“Submission” is the word Bayrou used, venting on social media about how a long-standing alliance now looked more like surrender than solidarity. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, always the straight-talker, went further: “It wasn’t a real deal. It was Donald Trump eating von der Leyen for breakfast.” You don’t have to squint too hard to see what happened: in Washington’s world, if you’re not at the table, you are absolutely on the menu. Both Democrats and Republicans seem happy enough playing that game.
Europe’s “Unity” Tested Once Again
The wound runs deep for France—it’s not just politics, it’s national pride, the gnawing sense of being stuck on the losing end of the global stick. French Minister for European Affairs Benjamin Haddad kept things diplomatic but didn’t hide his reservations: this US-EU trade deal might give some short-term stability, but it’s nowhere near fair.
Meanwhile, Germany—ever the pragmatist—took a different tack. Chancellor Friedrich Merz was all for the agreement, even giving thanks to von der Leyen and EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič for their negotiating hustle: “This agreement has succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard.” He pointed out that the brutal 27.5% auto tariff had nearly been chopped in half. But the undertone? Relief, not triumph.
Mao Zedong once quipped that China suffered because it was “a pile of loose sand.” The phrase still stings, and people love to apply it to the modern EU.
The Old World’s Fractures on Display
Sun Yat-sen nailed it a century ago: China is a nation-state; Europe is a patchwork. Since the Qin and Han, China’s stayed more or less whole as a nation. Europe? Imagine a wild ant nest—red ants and black ants all swarming, just waiting for someone to kick the mound. When the US shakes things up with tariffs or trade deals, all those cracks are exposed again. No united will, no shared backbone—just old rivals forced to share a lunch table.
The EU’s grand plans always seem to unravel at moments like this. With no more colonies to fight about, internal divisions flare, and it’s pretty clear: if Trump decided to press for even more, the EU would probably fold.
China: Not Your “Loose Sand” Cliché
Some are already asking, will America now turn its fire on China? Here’s the real difference: Europe may have been mocked as “Né dans l'injustice, il a fini dans l'opprobre”. Or, “Born in injustice, he ended in disgrace.” That old French dig was meant for imperial Germany, but look at Europe and America today—rivals or not, both built empires on shaky, even shameful, grounds.
But China? Lose the lazy comparisons. While others were tripping over their own divisions, China was busy becoming a mountain, not a sandpile. Maybe, just maybe, the US should realize when it’s time to quit while it’s ahead—because this isn’t yesterday’s China.
Deep Blue
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **
So, here we are with whispers swirling that Donald Trump has circled a date and is gearing up for a visit to China before the year’s out. Funny enough, while the White House has suddenly decided to cool it on the usual chest-thumping towards Beijing—dialing down tech restrictions and all—China’s kept things low-key, barely lifting an eyebrow. When pressed, China’s spokesperson basically shrugged, saying, “Head-of-state diplomacy plays an irreplaceable strategic role in guiding China-US relations. As for the specific matter you mentioned, I currently have no information to provide.”
Diplomats and observers are already cracking jokes: “If Trump had his way, he’d be on the next flight to Beijing.” Trump seems keen as mustard for this sit-down, way more eager than Xi Jinping. That flips the script—Beijing might just have the upper hand at the negotiating table for once. But nothing’s set in stone. As the seasoned China watchers remind us, with issues like Taiwan or a stray comment from a hardliner lurking in the wings, even a tiny misstep could send this whole circus off the rails.
America’s Tech Sanctions: Softening Up
Just last week, the US suddenly let Nvidia ship those H20 chips to China again. Bit of a twist, since Trump had slapped the ban on those very exports back in April. China didn’t take it lying down—they immediately threatened to choke off supplies of rare earths and magnets, which are vital for American manufacturers, from carmakers to defense industries. According to Taiwan’s Central News Agency, top guys in Trump’s camp figured Nividia was right that keep selling chips to China instead on sitting on them would be better for US tech to keep its leading position.
The fact? White House phones ringing off the hook as CEOs warned that US factories—yeah, even heavy-hitters like Ford and Suzuki—could grind to a halt if the standoff dragged on. Faced with the threat of stalled assembly lines, Team Trump decided maybe now’s a good time to lower the temperature with Beijing.
The End of the Hardliners?
With Trump now laser-focused on securing his China trip, those in the White House who love a good trade war are finding themselves shown the exit. The ones championing global tech expansion? Suddenly, they’re getting all the attention. Trump’s moving away from hostility and signalling he’d rather negotiate than keep up the tit-for-tat. Even Commerce Secretary Lutnick and ex-China hawk Secretary of State Rubio have changed their tune, falling in line behind the president’s new direction. Meanwhile, the once-dominant National Security Council hawks are quietly being shown the door.
New Faces, New Approach
What’s the upshot? With the “hawks” out of the way, folks like David Sacks, nicknamed the “AI Czar,” are unblocking pathways for tech companies, giving them way more room to breathe (and do business) globally. Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang wasted no time, lobbying Washington to let AI chips flow back to China, going so far as to vouch that none of this gear would be powering the PLA. For Huang, China’s just a “competitor”—not the monster the hawkish narrative would make you believe.
Meanwhile, word is that Trump’s team is cooking up some real, meaty trade talks with Beijing—not just to open doors for American firms, but to pave the runway for Trump’s much-anticipated journey.
At the end of the day, whether the hawks hijacked the last round of US policy or whether Trump was always playing his own long game isn’t so important. What matters is the result: with the old school sidelined, America’s inching forward. If Trump really does touch down in China, it could well prove to be a moment that shifts the game—one small step for Washington, one giant leap for global sanity.
