So, France calls it a "Dark Day". French Prime Minister François Bayrou didn’t hold back this year when the so-called “framework” trade agreement was inked between Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump. “It is a dark day,” he said, “when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission.” And frankly, it’s hard to disagree. The new deal means the Europeans will pump a staggering $600billion investments into US, throw another $750billion at the US energy sector, and—just in case that wasn’t enough—America slaps on a juicy 15% tariff on European exports.
“Submission” is the word Bayrou used, venting on social media about how a long-standing alliance now looked more like surrender than solidarity. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, always the straight-talker, went further: “It wasn’t a real deal. It was Donald Trump eating von der Leyen for breakfast.” You don’t have to squint too hard to see what happened: in Washington’s world, if you’re not at the table, you are absolutely on the menu. Both Democrats and Republicans seem happy enough playing that game.
Europe’s “Unity” Tested Once Again
The wound runs deep for France—it’s not just politics, it’s national pride, the gnawing sense of being stuck on the losing end of the global stick. French Minister for European Affairs Benjamin Haddad kept things diplomatic but didn’t hide his reservations: this US-EU trade deal might give some short-term stability, but it’s nowhere near fair.
Meanwhile, Germany—ever the pragmatist—took a different tack. Chancellor Friedrich Merz was all for the agreement, even giving thanks to von der Leyen and EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič for their negotiating hustle: “This agreement has succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard.” He pointed out that the brutal 27.5% auto tariff had nearly been chopped in half. But the undertone? Relief, not triumph.
Mao Zedong once quipped that China suffered because it was “a pile of loose sand.” The phrase still stings, and people love to apply it to the modern EU.
The Old World’s Fractures on Display
Sun Yat-sen nailed it a century ago: China is a nation-state; Europe is a patchwork. Since the Qin and Han, China’s stayed more or less whole as a nation. Europe? Imagine a wild ant nest—red ants and black ants all swarming, just waiting for someone to kick the mound. When the US shakes things up with tariffs or trade deals, all those cracks are exposed again. No united will, no shared backbone—just old rivals forced to share a lunch table.
The EU’s grand plans always seem to unravel at moments like this. With no more colonies to fight about, internal divisions flare, and it’s pretty clear: if Trump decided to press for even more, the EU would probably fold.
China: Not Your “Loose Sand” Cliché
Some are already asking, will America now turn its fire on China? Here’s the real difference: Europe may have been mocked as “Né dans l'injustice, il a fini dans l'opprobre”. Or, “Born in injustice, he ended in disgrace.” That old French dig was meant for imperial Germany, but look at Europe and America today—rivals or not, both built empires on shaky, even shameful, grounds.
But China? Lose the lazy comparisons. While others were tripping over their own divisions, China was busy becoming a mountain, not a sandpile. Maybe, just maybe, the US should realize when it’s time to quit while it’s ahead—because this isn’t yesterday’s China.
Deep Blue
** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **
In the latest international upheaval, Europe is taking the hardest hit. After 300 years of modern civilization and the churn of imperial powers, that era is gone, and a better tomorrow is nowhere in sight.
Europe has one problem: it cannot take care of itself. “No one really knows whether Europe would still be able to produce toothpaste if it weren’t for China,” the EU Chamber of Commerce said.
Europe doesn’t make toothpaste; it sells luxury brands. Fine — look at the latest news. Reuters reports that the U.S.-Israel-Iran war has delivered a blow to European luxury labels. Sales at Dubai’s upscale malls, packed with wealthy shoppers, have fallen 50 percent, and LVMH, France’s largest luxury group, says wealthy Middle Eastern customers have paused spending in Europe because of the conflict in the Gulf region.
The New York Times, in a piece headlined “Europe Is Done With Appeasing Trump”, lays out several of Europe’s current pains.
“The barrage of tariffs that opened the second Trump administration, aimed indiscriminately at friend and foe; the brazen demands that Denmark cede Greenland to the United States, and now the absence of any consultation with European allies before joining Israel in an attack on Iran that has affected the entire world, have erased any illusion among most Europeans that Mr. Trump is anything but an unpredictable, vindictive and uncontrollable danger,” it wrote.
Trump’s latest move is to impose a blockade on all Iranian ports from Monday, adding another barrier in the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. president has repeatedly said, with obvious satisfaction, that America has oil and natural gas, and that oil shipping blockage cannot bring the United States to its knees. In other words, if Iran wants a war of attrition, the White House is ready to go all the way. America’s NATO allies, meanwhile, make clear they will “decline to join in.” Europe’s oil supply is already under pressure: Russian oil and gas are cut off, and Middle Eastern shipping now faces a second lock. So is Trump punishing Iran, or Europe?
“Last year, export controls imposed by Beijing on seven rare earth elements and the magnets made from them had especially severe consequences. China is a global leader in the production of these critical raw materials, which are widely used in electric motors, smartphones, and numerous everyday electronic devices,” Deutsche Welle reported. “The EU Chamber of Commerce said nearly one-third of its member companies indicated in a questionnaire survey at the beginning of this year that their business had been affected by China’s export control measures.”
The EU Chamber of Commerce knows perfectly well that China-EU relations have been pulled off course by the United States, and that Europe has not shaped its foreign and trade policy around its own interests. It has even had to tear out 5G networks built by Huawei and ZTE, while Chinese electric vehicles face restrictions. That has only made China-EU ties more tangled. Europe can hardly be called arrogant now. Energy supplies are unstable, and rare earth constraints have turned it into an industrial power with nothing usable to work with. So what now?
Although calls to “de-risk” economic ties with China have persisted for years, many European companies continue to bet on the Chinese market. Over the past year, EU figures show that 26% of companies said they were relocating their supply chains to China, “a proportion twice that of companies choosing to move their supply chains out of China or establish a second hub overseas.” The trend is clearly still going strong.
Europe’s major powers, including France, Italy and Germany, all feel the need to break free from the manipulation and humiliation imposed by the United States, especially the Trump team. Europe has finally woken up and is now pushing for independence and autonomy, placing its national destiny firmly in its own hands.
Nothing in the world is difficult if you are willing to scale the heights. Europe becoming strong again is no dream, but starting over takes patience. I would say 300 years is enough for you to turn things around.
