Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Historical evidence reveals Japanese medics' involvement in germ warfare

China

China

China

Historical evidence reveals Japanese medics' involvement in germ warfare

2025-08-15 22:19 Last Updated At:22:37

A batch of historical evidence released on Friday shows collaboration of Japanese medical personnel in the Imperial Japanese Army's germ warfare and other war crimes committed on Chinese soil.

The evidence, including photos, video footage and documents, were collected by the Exhibition Hall of Evidences of Crime Committed by Unit 731 of the Japanese Imperial Army in northeast China's Harbin. They proved medics involvement in germ warfare, and the connections between Japanese medical organizations and the notorious Unit 731 which conducted biochemical warfare research and human medical experiments.

The evidences included a well-preserved commemorative photo album of a graduating class of Japanese Army Military Medical School students from 1943, containing 281 photos and 329 student names. One name in particular caught historians' attention.

"In this photo album, through comparison and research, we can confirm one person has served in Unit 731. His name is Hiroshi Hosoya. This person joined Unit 731's Branch 162 as a deputy commander. Under his command, Branch 162 conducted a large amount of biological weapon development and germ attacks," said Jin Shicheng, a researcher with the exhibition hall.

Researchers noted that Unit 731 was in fact formerly the epidemic prevention research department of the Japanese Army Military Medical School, and the school has trained and supplied a large number of personnel to Unit 731.

"Students who graduated from the Japanese Army Military Medical School and entered Unit 731 were mostly skilled high-ranking officers. They were the core force for conducting bacterial research and live dissections," Jin said.

In addition to medical schools in Japan, some medical institutions established by the Japanese Imperial Army in China also had intricate connections with Unit 731.

In the newly released complete oral testimony of former Unit 731 youth corps member Kikuta Sunaga, he mentioned the connection between the unit and the First Army Hospital of the Japanese Army in Harbin.

"As an army hospital, the Seventh Unit (a reference to First Army Hospital of the Japanese Army in Harbin) was considered a large hospital in Harbin. One or two people from our unit also moved from places like the research labs to the Seventh Unit," Sunaga recalled.

Researchers said that the Army Hospital was an extension of Unit 731's medical crimes and a key participant and affiliate in the Japanese Imperial Army's germ warfare. In a newly unveiled 220-page book of personnel declaration forms from the hospital, one person's files showed he had served in a chemical warfare unit.

"This person's name is Takeo Okada. He was a technical employee at the First Army Hospital of the Japanese Army in Harbin. From this document, it shows his former unit was the Kwantung Army's chemical department, which is what we often refer to as Unit 516. It was a chemical warfare unit at the time. Through this information, we can learn that there were personnel exchanges and interactions between the hospital and Unit 516," Jin said.

Researchers say many Japanese medical schools and some hospitals were also engaging in germ experiments at the time, reflecting Japan's intention of using germ warfare as a shortcut to victory after it waged a war of aggression against China.

Japan launched a bloody invasion of China with the September 18 Incident in 1931.

The Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression lasted until 1945, with Japan announcing its unconditional surrender on Aug. 15.

Historical evidence reveals Japanese medics' involvement in germ warfare

Historical evidence reveals Japanese medics' involvement in germ warfare

The United Arab Emirates' (UAE) exit from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the broader OPEC+ is unlikely to jolt oil markets in the short term, but sets the stage for lower prices once the Iran conflict ends and Gulf exports resume, experts said.

Effective Friday, the UAE formally withdrew from OPEC in a move poised to reshape global oil markets. The decision came amid heightened geopolitical tensions driven by the ongoing Iran conflict.

The UAE Energy Minister Suhail Al Mazrouei said the timing was chosen to cause the least market disruption. But analysts say the exit reflects the UAE's long-simmering frustrations over production quotas that no longer align with its capacity.

"It gives the UAE flexibility to move from a quota within OPEC of 3.3 million barrels a day to 5 million barrels a day in 2027. It won't radically change the pricing. It will make more energy available. So, it will take some of the price pressures off," said John Defterios, senior advisor for APCO Worldwide, a global advisory firm, and also senior fellow at the Center for Energy and Materials of the World Economic Forum.

While immediate market impact remains muted amid wartime volatility, experts anticipate meaningful shifts once regional stability returns.

"It has no impact right now, because obviously oil prices right now depend on the state of the war and whether exports can start freely through the Gulf and so on. But assume, once the war is over and a normal transit resumes, I would expect the UAE will move quickly to increase production and try to refill some of that storage that was drained. And that should mean, in general, lower prices for oil importers, for oil consumers. In the longer term, yes, I think also probably it means lower prices," said Robin Mills, CEO of Qamar Energy, a Dubai-based independent consultancy company.

The UAE's departure highlights structural tensions within OPEC+. As a low-cost producer with billions invested in upstream expansion, Abu Dhabi increasingly chafed against collective quotas.

However, other members, including Iraq and Kazakhstan, also sought higher production allowances.

"This pressure has been building up for some time. But Saudi Arabia was also in a difficult position. If it agreed to grant higher production levels to the UAE, then it would have to grant them to Iraq as well. Kazakhstan wanted more [allowance as well]. Everybody wants special treatment," said Mills.

Strategically, the move aligns with the UAE's broader vision to diversify its economy.

"They made this announcement ahead of a very important forum, Make It In the Emirates, which displays what the UAE is doing in terms of diversification outside of oil and gas. So, they want that revenue from oil and gas -- the extra 50 billion dollars a year to go into greater diversification. It's advanced manufacturing, it's artificial intelligence, it's the next wave of financial services, and it is trade," said Defterios.

The exit also signals a broader recalibration of legacy energy institutions in a world confronting new climate imperatives, geopolitical fragmentation, and energy transition pressures.

"I do think it shows definitely a world in which there's a new energy reality, there's a new climate reality, there's a new geopolitical reality. And these legacy institutions have to adapt. And if they don't, then of course, their members will either leave or at least won't take them seriously," said Mills.

UAE's OPEC exit long expected, may ease oil prices after Iran war ends: experts

UAE's OPEC exit long expected, may ease oil prices after Iran war ends: experts

Recommended Articles