The Washington Post is in no position to cast stones at Hong Kong. While the almighty USA is in tatters with its leader Donald Trump sending the national guard to restore law and order in key cities, the Post maintains Hong Kong “is no longer an open, freewheeling city it once was.”
The paper’s editorial board posted on September 19 that investors were staying away from Hong Kong, journalists were being routinely denied entry visas, and western tourists were advised not to travel to the city or face arbitrary arrest under the national security law.
Scary stuff from the country’s foremost newspaper that carries tremendous clout in the corridors of power. But it’s all untrue, fake news. It may still be an authoritative newspaper in the eyes of a naive local population, but to the international community it has lost all credibility.
In the latest World Population Review, Hong Kong was placed fourth in the world for net inflows of foreign investments. It is estimated that the total foreign investment in 2024 brought to Hong Kong's economy exceeds more than HK$67.7 billion, which also represents a record high and a nearly 10 per cent increase compared to 2023. These companies expected to create 6,864 job opportunities in Hong Kong during their first year of operation, an over 67 per cent increase compared to 2023. That’s hardly investors staying away as claimed by the Post.
The Post complained about journalists being routinely denied visas to Hong Kong. There was only one case this year and another in 2018. And the reasons could be multiple, including having a criminal record, reporting that incites hatred etc. One case this year does not imply “routinely denied.” Hong Kong enjoys being host to about 70 foreign news organizations with Bloomberg alone employing several hundred manning its financial and news desks. In the almighty US, all media covering the Pentagon for example – local and foreign – must submit all articles to the newly named Department of War for approval before publication. So much for freedom of the press and expression with the media continualy being harassed by the president and his cronies.
The focus of the Post’s editorial was Jimmy Lai and the national security law.
It claimed that Lai was facing “manufactured charges of sedition” and that it was “a foregone conclusion that he’ll be found guilty.” How dare they suggest that Hong Kong “manufactures” criminal charges. The Post has made a groundless accusation without providing any evidence. Obviously, it has not done its homework, nor checked its facts, a prerequisite of any publication, especially when an editorial board of the Post’s reputation is headed by extremely experienced journalists. It’s unfathomable.
Hong Kong is a fair and just city. According to the 2024 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index, Hong Kong ranked sixth in East Asia and the Pacific and was placed 23rd out of 142 countries and jurisdictions globally. The almighty US was three points lower at 26. In other words, Hong Kong is better placed in maintaining the rule of law than the US.
And, according to the Post it’s a “foregone conclusion [Jimmy Lai] will be found guilty.” Again, how dare they. In Hong Kong a person is innocent until found guilty. It is not a “foregone conclusion.” The Jimmy Lai trial for sedition and colluding with foreign forces lasted for 156 days during which ample evidence for and against was presented to a panel of three judges. They are currently weighing up that evidence and will present their findings in due course. Only then will Lai and the public know his fate. There is no “foregone conclusion.” By making this statement, the Post’s editorial board is accusing the Hong Kong courts of bias. They owe the Hong Kong judiciary an apology for the accusation.
The paper concluded its editorial that it was up to “China’s communist rulers in Beijing” to decide if Lai is to be ever released from jail. Poppycock! The trial of Jimmy Lai has nothing to do with Beijing, as implied by the Post. Lai was arrested in Hong Kong, charged for alleged crimes committed in Hong Kong, and tried in Hong Kong.
It is a pity that an upstanding publication such as the Washington Post should tarnish its reputation by publishing a story with such bias that is harmful to Hong Kong without checking the facts.
Mark Pinkstone
** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **
