The conclusion of the Jimmy Lai Chee-ying trial, which lasted 156 days, was a showcase on law and order in Hong Kong and showed that justice seen is justice done.
A panel of three judges – Esther Toh Lye-ping, Susana D’Almada Remedios and Alex Lee – delivered their verdict on Monday that Jimmy Lai was guilty of national security charges involving two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one count of conspiracy to print seditious articles.
In their ruling, detailed in an 855-page document, the judges said Lai was the “mastermind” behind the conspiracies, with his sole intent was to “seek the downfall” of the ruling Communist Party.
The trial, which spanned two years (December 2023-2025), with breaks in between, drew international attention through a global campaign by his son, Sebastien, and his team of public relations cum legal experts, Doughty Street Chambers, of London.
They kept the story alive visiting world leaders and TV networks pleading for Lai senior’s release from custody citing poor health. And they got the sound bites they wanted, but the end result was useless. Jimmy Lai was found guilty as charged and could face life imprisonment, the maximum penalty for collusion.
Before passing sentence, the judges will hear mitigating arguments from Lai’s solicitors on January 12 as to why he should be sentenced and if so for a minimum period. They will surely use Lai’s deteriorating health as their main argument.
After the mitigating hearing, which is expected to last about a week, the judges will retire to decide Lai’s fate.
An interesting aspect of the trial is its open transparency. Although Hong Kong is rated 6th in the Asia/Pacific region and 24th out of 143 countries worldwide by the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index, the Lai lobbyists branded the High Court as a “sham court.”
The territory’s prosecuting office and the Chief Executive decided on a three-member panel of judges to hear the case instead of going for a full jury hearing. The reason is obvious: it would be difficult to find a seven- or 12-member panel of ordinary citizens who had not heard of the Jimmy Lai arrest and formed an opinion before the trial started.
The courtroom was specially configured to allow 58 seats in the public gallery and another 42 for the press in the main courtroom. Of those, 21 are allocated to local media, 14 to international outlets and seven to digital news platforms.
A group of about 16 western diplomats arrived at the court at around 8.20am on Monday morning with representatives from the UK, the US, the EU and Canada among them to hear the verdict and report back to their respective foreign ministers. Most of them attended the hearings every day to observe the fairness of the court. Never has a Hong Kong court hearing been under such intense scrutiny.
It could not be more transparent. It was open to the world. From the first day that prosecution witnesses gave their evidence to the closing remarks by the defendant, the foreign diplomats and international press were there recording every word spoken.
There is absolutely no reason for anyone to call it a “sham court” and international reaction will be interesting. Their comments could implicate their complicity in Lai’s masterplan to overthrow the Chinese government.
Speaking outside the West Kowloon Law Courts Building on Monday, shortly after the guilty verdict was delivered, Chief Superintendent Steve Li Kwai-wah of the police force’s National Security Department said Lai’s conviction was “justice served.”
Lai “exploited his media enterprise” and used his wealth and “extensive foreign political connections” to collude with foreign powers, Li said.
His views were echoed by Secretary for Security Chris Tang Ping-keung who believed that the trial illustrates how safe Hong Kong is and how we are able to interdict all the national security concerns and all the attempts to affect the national security. “I think this is a good showcase to show that Hong Kong is safe and it is safe to do investments in Hong Kong,” he said.
Indeed. The Jimmy Lai trial was a showcase on how Hong Kong’s rule of law and judicial prudence can shape the city to make it the Pearl of the Orient.
Mark Pinkstone
** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **
Without a doubt Hong Kong is a major player in global financial markets, an accolade that is being further enhanced with the city’s rising status as the top arts hub in Asia with global recognition in its sights.
International attention is focused on Hong Kong during March as it hosts a series of art-related events culminating in the world-acclaimed Art Basel Hong Kong 2026. For Hong Kong and, indeed, the art world, this is a major event where outstanding works of art are displayed and sold.
Art Basel Hong Kong kicked off locally in 2013 and has become a prominent flagship on the city’s international calendar every year thereafter. And it brings in thousands of visitors. Last year, for example, it featured 240 galleries from 42 countries and regions, attracting 85,500 visitors, half of which travelled to Hong Kong for the event. Another 240 galleries from Australia, Japan, Turkey, the Netherlands, France, Georgia, Spain and the United States are taking part in the exhibition this year.
A curtain raiser to Art Basel is the home-grown Art Central along the Central harborfront, which featured some 117 galleries with 500 artists from around the world. That makes 357 galleries featured in these two exhibitions this week.
This highlight of Hong Kong’s event calendar is a boon for our tourist industry, attracting several million visitors in a single month. Hotels are booked to capacity and bars and restaurants report an additional 15-20 per cent increase in revenue during the month. Government economists estimate that every 1.5 million tourists add HK$3 billion to Hong Kong’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Since its inaugural edition in 2015, Art Central has established itself as a leading platform for innovation in contemporary art, advancing the profiles of artists and galleries and reinforcing their presence within the international art landscape.
It was Betty Fung Ching Suk-yee, CEO of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WestK) who noted that the cultural industry is closely connected with finance, as family offices are increasingly looking to invest in art in Hong Kong.
“We could also work with financial institutions to encourage more of their clients to become art collectors,” she said. “It’s not going to be overnight, you might first become a member of a museum, then a patron, then you might start to buy or even donate.”
Having already developed a reputation as an art trading centre, the city is now making its mark as an arts and cultural hub, led by the continued development of WestK.
These two art exhibitions are in a place where new talent is discovered. Collectors generally buy art from well established artists like Pablo Picasso, who has a collection of about 30 pieces of his works on display at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre. These art pieces are regarded as minor works and can be purchased for several thousand US dollars.
The art market has fully recovered from the declines due to the COVID outbreak and in 2024 sales of art works through auctions and private negotiations reached about US$39 million (HK$300 million).
The art market is full of artists that have yet to gain a following or break into the blue-chip world. Up-and-coming artists often produce top-tier quality works for a fraction of the price of blue-chip pieces because they don’t yet have the name recognition. Up and coming artists who have won competitions organised by the Sovereign Art Foundation and others have made the first step to such recognition.
Knowledge of the art world and art market is helpful, so beginners are not likely to stumble upon the next Andy Warhol. This form of investing is highly speculative compared to investing in old masters or blue-chip work. The exhibition is a showcase for new artists to make their debut to the international buyers and collectors looking for new talent with potential.
Hong Kong’s West Kowloon arts hub has signed agreements with 12 international institutions from Australia, the UK, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, paving the way for future collaborations as the city seeks to strengthen its role as an East-meets-West cultural hub. This will help bring more international performances to the city, showcase Hong Kong productions to global audiences, support the exchange of talent and more. The agreements were signed during a two-day International Cultural Summit held in conjunction with the cultural festivities.
But the agreement which cements Hong Kong as the arts hub of Asia was that signed by Art Basel of Switzerland to continue holding Art Basel Hong Kong for the next five years.
The collaboration with Art Basel for the next five years is the result of sustained investment in Hong Kong’s role as a global financial centre, collaboration and a shared commitment to make Hong Kong a place where the arts can truly flourish.
Internationally acclaimed artists bring fame to Hong Kong, a melting pot where culture transcends borders. And even without such major events, Hong Kong’s array of galleries along Hollywood Road is a living museum of fine arts, a major tourist attraction in the city.
