Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

DeVry University Releases Annual Report on Upskilling in the U.S., Bridging the Gap: Overcoming a Silent Standoff in America’s Talent Economy, Uncovering a Widening Gap Between Workers and Employers

News

DeVry University Releases Annual Report on Upskilling in the U.S., Bridging the Gap: Overcoming a Silent Standoff in America’s Talent Economy, Uncovering a Widening Gap Between Workers and Employers
News

News

DeVry University Releases Annual Report on Upskilling in the U.S., Bridging the Gap: Overcoming a Silent Standoff in America’s Talent Economy, Uncovering a Widening Gap Between Workers and Employers

2025-09-23 22:01 Last Updated At:22:10

LISLE, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sep 23, 2025--

Today, DeVry University released its third annual report on upskilling and reskilling the U.S. workforce amid various dynamic shifts, including the rapid adoption of AI and an increasingly volatile economy. In partnership with independent research firm Reputation Leaders, the research reveals a growing gap between employers and workers on the skills needed to deploy a future-ready workforce.

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250923538431/en/

The report, Bridging the Gap: Overcoming a Silent Standoff in America’s Talent Economy, surveyed more than 1,500 workers and over 500 hiring decision-makers from a mix of industries to uncover current gaps and opportunities in upskilling and reskilling.

“This year’s research reveals an interesting dynamic we’re calling a ‘silent standoff’ in the workplace,” said Elise Awwad, president and CEO of DeVry University. “While both workers and employers feel equipped for the present, many doubt their readiness for the future. When workers assume they’re prepared and employers fear they are not, the result is paralysis. Now more than ever, it’s critical to bridge this gap and create a roadmap for upskilling, reskilling and long-term workforce readiness.”

The research identified the following points of tension with actionable takeaways for employers and workers to help bridge divergent perspectives and foster long-term growth:

When it comes to skills development, employers and workers have misaligned needs—and perceptions.

Despite economic uncertainty and rapid technological change, 85% of workers feel confident they don’t need further qualifications to stay employable within the next five years, while 69% of employers worry that their workforce lacks the skills needed for future success. This dynamic creates an environment where workers feel disengaged, while employers are anxious but unclear about how to move forward. As hiring slows and upskilling lags, both sides must collaborate to bridge this gap, otherwise, progress will remain out of reach.

Amid the rapid global adoption of AI, durable—or soft skills—are becoming the new job security.

As AI transforms the workplace, durable skills like critical thinking, communication and adaptability are emerging as the true drivers of job security and career advancement, with 78% of employers and 63% of workers agreeing on their importance. Employers are increasingly prioritizing these human-centric skills over technical expertise, noting them as decisive in promotions and layoffs, yet 66% remain concerned about their workforce’s ability to keep up with AI. While workers highly value AI skills, they lack clarity on how to use them effectively, underscoring the need to nurture durable skills and offer practical guidance and training for workers to unlock their full potential.

Amid a shift in valued credentials and without a clear path for skills development, a growth gridlock is emerging.

Both workers (71%) and employers (81%) say investing time and money in education is worthwhile in today’s economy, reflecting a shared belief in the value of lifelong learning. Recent and skill-specific credentials are now essential, with 86% of employers saying staying current with industry developments is key. However, while 90% of employers claim to offer upskilling benefits, workers report declining access and question whether employers are doing enough to help them build currency.

The silent standoff between employers and workers will continue to accelerate if both groups do not proactively work to bridge the gap.

Today, 75% of employers say they’re doing enough to make workers’ skills resilient in today’s economy, yet 1 in 3 workers disagree, uncovering an emerging skills gap. To overcome this gap and build a resilient workforce, both sides must engage in open dialogue and commit to lifelong learning. Workers should proactively ask employers about talent expectations and pursue flexible, skill-specific learning opportunities, while employers must offer clear guidance, structured training and transparent growth pathways.

“Collaboration is the unlock,” commented Awwad. “That means employers providing clearer pathways and workers embracing lifelong learning, while together aligning on key skills, embracing AI responsibly, and mapping out future competencies. Upskilling must be treated as a national priority. The resilience of our workforce and the vitality of our economy depend on it.”

To view all the findings, click here.

About the Survey

DeVry University engaged Reputation Leaders, an independent research firm, to survey workers and employers about their attitudes and perceptions surrounding upskilling and reskilling between June 17 and July 28, 2025. The worker sample consisted of a total of 1,511 American adults between the ages of 21 and 60. The respondents were employed, underemployed or unemployed but expecting to start work in the next 12 months. The employer sample consisted of 533 hiring decision-makers from a mix of industries, with a particular focus on the technology sector.

About DeVry University

DeVry University strives to close society’s opportunity gap and address emerging talent needs by preparing learners to thrive in careers shaped by continuous technological change. Founded in 1931, the university offers undergraduate and graduate programs onsite and online in Business, Healthcare and Technology. DeVry University is accredited by The Higher Learning Commission (HLC, www.hlcommission.org/ ). The university’s Keller Graduate School of Management is included in this accreditation. To learn more, visit devry.edu

Today, DeVry University released its third annual report on upskilling and reskilling the U.S. workforce amid various dynamic shifts, including the rapid adoption of AI and an increasingly volatile economy.

Today, DeVry University released its third annual report on upskilling and reskilling the U.S. workforce amid various dynamic shifts, including the rapid adoption of AI and an increasingly volatile economy.

LAS VEGAS (AP) — The Las Vegas Review-Journal announced Friday that it will no longer print its rival the Las Vegas Sun for the first time in decades, amid an ongoing legal dispute over the nation's last joint operating agreement stemming from a 1970 law designed to preserve newspapers.

Readers “will not find a printed Las Vegas Sun insert inside,” the Review-Journal said in an editorial, noting the Sun maintains a website, has a few hundred thousand followers across social media platforms, and is free to produce its own newspaper.

“We encourage them to do so. The Review-Journal competes with countless sources of news and entertainment, but we would welcome one more. We just don’t want to foot the bill. It is time the Sun stood up on its own two feet,” the editorial said, without specifying the cost.

The two publications will be in court Friday and the Sun hopes a judge will order printing to immediately resume, attorney Leif Reid said in an email. It will be the first day in 76 years that the Sun hasn’t been printed, he said.

“This does irreparable harm to our community, as no one benefits when a local newspaper is prevented from being published,” he said.

The now-rare joint operating agreement required the Sun to be printed as a daily insert in the Review-Journal, while both companies remained editorially independent with separate newsrooms and websites.

A lower court had found the agreement was unenforceable because a 2005 update was never signed by the U.S. attorney general, and in February the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by the Sun.

The Review-Journal editorial called the Supreme Court decision a decisive victory, saying that halting publication of the Sun on Friday was “a result of 6½ years of litigation between the newspapers, precipitated by the Sun.”

Such agreements between rival publications have dwindled as part of a "long, slow goodbye of newspapers as we knew them,” said Ken Doctor, a news business analyst. The Detroit Free Press and the Detroit News ended a 40-year agreement last year. USA Today Co., which owns the Detroit Free Press, recently announced its plans to purchase the Detroit News.

In 1950, the Sun was founded in response to the Review-Journal’s refusal to negotiate with typesetters from the International Typographical Union. The union started its own newspaper and reached out to businessman Hank Greenspun for financial backing. The Greenspuns still own the paper.

The Review-Journal has been publishing since 1909, first as the Clark County Review. It is owned by the Adelson family, casino magnates and mega GOP donors, and remains the state’s largest newspaper.

The Review-Journal’s editorials lean more conservative, while the Sun’s lean liberal. The 1970 law signed by then President Richard Nixon, called the Newspaper Preservation Act, was designed to save newspapers costs while maintaining competition and editorial variety in cities as newspapers began to financially struggle.

The papers first entered into a joint operating agreement in 1989 when the Sun was struggling to stay afloat financially. The agreement made the Sun an afternoon newspaper during weekdays and a section within the Review-Journal on weekend mornings, while the Review-Journal handled production, distribution and advertising. The Review-Journal also collected all revenue and was required to pay the Sun monthly to cover the Sun’s news and editorial expenses.

In 2005 the agreement was amended to make the Sun an insert in the Review-Journal every morning.

Review-Journal owners sought to end the agreement in 2019, and in response the Sun’s owners filed a lawsuit alleging that ending the agreement violated anti-trust laws.

The 1970 law allowing such agreements was signed at a time when news options weren't as prevalent and there was more concern over news monopolies.

Las Vegas — and Nevada as a whole — today have more strong, independent news organizations compared to other places, said Stephen Bates, a journalism and media professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

The Sun also publishes online. But it has argued in court that losing its print product could make it harder to recruit staff, cause a loss in readers, and even force it to close.

Genelle Belmas, a journalism professor at the University of Kansas who specializes in media law, said it would be disappointing if the last joint operating agreement in the country ends. During visits to Vegas, she's enjoyed being able to pick up the Review-Journal and see the Sun folded inside, offering two differing points of view in one place. Online news outlets make it easier for consumers to stay in their echo chambers, she said.

“Every local news outlet we lose — and that includes big towns, small towns, whatever — is a loss of perspective and a loss of a potential alternative view,” Belmas said.

FILE - This Dec. 17, 2015 file photo shows a sign outside the building housing the Las Vegas Review-Journal in Las Vegas. AP Photo/John Locher, File)

FILE - This Dec. 17, 2015 file photo shows a sign outside the building housing the Las Vegas Review-Journal in Las Vegas. AP Photo/John Locher, File)

Recommended Articles