Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Virginia has a data center boon. Officials debate whether it's time to scrap its tax breaks

News

Virginia has a data center boon. Officials debate whether it's time to scrap its tax breaks
News

News

Virginia has a data center boon. Officials debate whether it's time to scrap its tax breaks

2026-03-11 22:23 Last Updated At:22:30

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Nearly two decades ago, Virginia gave tech companies a tax break on equipment and software, and they began to build. The state became a data center hub, and they kept building. Residents bemoaned the noise while they built some more. Artificial intelligence boomed, and the power grid strained — still, more building.

Now, amid a growing national pushback on data centers, Virginia senators have voted to end a projected $1.6 billion annual tax break, requiring the industry to resume paying a minimum 5.3% sales tax. The proposal has left some opponents warning that it would bring construction of data centers in Virginia to a screeching halt.

“We have now left the ‘NIMBY’ phase: Not In My Backyard,” Republican state Sen. Mark Obenshain said last month. “And we've entered the ‘banana’ phase: Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything.”

Over the past 18 years, Virginia became the world's largest data hub. The debate taking place there comes as dozens of communities nationwide are fighting data centers in local zoning meetings, politicians are growing anxious about AI's effect on household electricity bills and lawmakers are considering reducing tax breaks — or scrapping them altogether.

The state tax department says the industry has invested more than $80 billion in Virginia and created thousands of jobs over the past two years. Obenshain is not the only one concerned about taxing it. The Data Center Coalition, which represents tech giants, said the tax would “effectively halt investment” from the industry. Just this month, Amazon Data Services bought land from George Washington University in northern Virginia for a data center, officials said.

It's far from guaranteed that the state Senate's proposal will pass the House. But it's already causing infighting among Democrats, fueled by a looming budget deadline.

Gov. Abigail Spanberger's office said she was wary of “going back on Virginia’s commitments to businesses that have invested in the Commonwealth.”

Democratic Sen. L. Louise Lucas, who chairs the finance committee and supports the tax proposal, retorted on X: “Gov. Spanberger thinks our chicken isn’t cooked — then what is the Senate supposed to pluck out of our budget? Raises for teachers, health insurance assistance, transit support, a tax rebate, or childcare slots?”

Lucas' proposal reflects growing pushback nationwide as the aisles of server racks in data centers have gotten increasingly large and seemingly endless, with campuses of server warehouses, electrical substations and backup diesel generators dwarfing the footprints of factories and stadiums. Some need more power than a small city, more than any utility has ever supplied to a single user.

Tax breaks have been a regular perk for developers of data centers, both big and small. State and town officials have seen them as an economic boon and competed with each other to land them, in part by granting property tax abatements and sales tax exemptions.

Those tax breaks let developers spend money tax-free to equip a data center with pricey things like servers, routers and HVAC equipment and, in some cases, to buy the materials to build them.

In Virginia, House Democrats are pushing to keep the tax breaks in place, and are sparring with senators. Lawmakers negotiating the budget have until Saturday to agree on and pass a spending plan, when their legislative session is set to end.

The move to end the tax breaks won bipartisan support in the Senate, with 21 Democrats and seven Republicans voting for it.

Sen. Richard Stuart, a Republican, said he didn't think repealing the tax break would affect tech's rush to build in Virginia: “This ain’t going to slow this train down one iota.”

Other states have moved to curtail such tax breaks, or add conditions.

In Minnesota, lawmakers last year removed the sales tax exemption on the purchase of electricity by the largest data centers, imposed a fee for electricity use and toughened regulations, including scrutiny over their water use.

Lawmakers in Washington state are advancing legislation this year that would keep the tax break for new data centers, but get rid of it for existing data centers that spend money to replace or upgrade equipment. That is worth $83 million for the state in the first year.

In Illinois, Gov. JB Pritzker last month called for a two-year “pause” on data center tax breaks, citing rising household electric bills, while Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs said she wants to eliminate the state's sales tax exemption completely. She called it a “corporate handout.”

Bills to repeal the tax breaks have been introduced this year in Arizona, Michigan and Georgia, even as tech companies have proven adept at lobbying in statehouses.

Lawmakers in Georgia passed a bill imposing a two-year pause on the state’s sales tax exemption for building and equipping data centers, but Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp in 2024 vetoed it.

Virginia senators still face opposition. The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers lobbied at the statehouse, urging lawmakers to protect data centers.

“We need this industry,” Dorian Hargrave, a Virginia-based electrical worker, said in a statement. “If we lose it, our economy is going to take a very big hit.”

FILE - Cars drive past data centers that house computer servers and hardware required to support modern internet use, such as artificial intelligence, in Ashburn, Virginia, July 16, 2023. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File)

FILE - Cars drive past data centers that house computer servers and hardware required to support modern internet use, such as artificial intelligence, in Ashburn, Virginia, July 16, 2023. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File)

LONDON (AP) — Documents released by the British government show officials believed there was a “reputational risk” to appointing Peter Mandelson as the U.S. ambassador because of his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The concerns were raised in a document sent to Prime Minister Keir Starmer in December 2024 before he appointed Mandelson to the role, seen as vital to establish a good relationship with the administration of President Donald Trump.

The document also spelled out other reputational issues over Mandelson’s work in a previous Labour government related to financial matters, including high-profile donors, and his work at Global Counsel.

The 147-page release was published Wednesday on the government website.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. AP’s earlier story follows below.

LONDON (AP) —

The British government on Wednesday published a batch of documents related to the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the U.S., as police investigate potential misconduct stemming from the ex-diplomat’s ties to the late Jeffrey Epstein.

The 147-page release was published Wednesday on the government website.

Lawmakers have forced Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government to disclose thousands of files about the decision to name Mandelson to the key diplomatic post at the start of U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term, despite a past friendship with the convicted sex offender.

The government has said the files will show that Mandelson misled officials about the extent of the relationship. But Starmer is facing a political storm over his decision to give him the Washington job.

Mandelson, 72, a former Cabinet minister, ambassador and elder statesman of the governing Labour Party, was arrested Feb. 23 at his London home on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He has been released without bail conditions as the police investigation continues.

He has previously denied wrongdoing and hasn’t been charged. He does not face allegations of sexual misconduct.

Cabinet minister Darren Jones said the “first tranche of documents” will be published Wednesday afternoon.

The documents are being published in batches after review by Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee. Police have asked the government not to release files that could compromise their criminal investigation into Mandelson.

“The documents that will be published today later to Parliament will provide full transparency about the appointments process, bar one document that has been held back by the Metropolitan Police because of an ongoing criminal investigation,” Jones told broadcaster ITV.

Starmer fired Mandelson in September after an earlier release of documents showed he had maintained contact with Epstein after the financier's 2008 conviction for sexual offenses involving a minor.

Further details about Mandelson's ties with Epstein, revealed in a huge trove of files published by the U.S. Department of Justice in January, drove opponents and even some members of Starmer’s Labour Party to call for the prime minister’s resignation. Starmer survived the immediate danger, but his position remains fragile, even though he never met Epstein and is not implicated in his crimes.

Starmer has apologized to Epstein’s victims and said he was sorry for “having believed Mandelson’s lies.”

The Epstein files suggest that Mandelson sent market-sensitive information to the convicted sex offender when he was the U.K. government’s business secretary after the 2008 financial crisis.

That includes an internal government report discussing ways the U.K. could raise money, including by selling off government assets. Mandelson also appears to have told Epstein he would lobby other members of the government to reduce a tax on bankers’ bonuses.

Mandelson is also facing a separate probe by the European Union’s anti-fraud office for the time he spent as the bloc’s trade representative.

Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer leaves 10 Downing Street to attend the weekly Prime Ministers' Questions session in parliament in London, Wednesday, March 11, 2026. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)

Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer leaves 10 Downing Street to attend the weekly Prime Ministers' Questions session in parliament in London, Wednesday, March 11, 2026. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)

Peter Mandelson, the former U.K. ambassador to the United States, leaves his house in London, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Peter Mandelson, the former U.K. ambassador to the United States, leaves his house in London, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Peter Mandelson, the former U.K. ambassador to the United States, leaves his house in London, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Peter Mandelson, the former U.K. ambassador to the United States, leaves his house in London, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Peter Mandelson, the former U.K. ambassador to the United States, leaves his house in London, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Peter Mandelson, the former U.K. ambassador to the United States, leaves his house in London, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Recommended Articles