A gathering of Japanese politicians and scholars was held in Tokyo on Friday to oppose the Japanese government's intention to expand its military and revise the constitution, calling on the government to abide by the pacifist constitution.
Yoshiko Kira, a member of the House of Councilors, criticized the dangerous pursuit of the government of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi at the meeting.
"Now, the Takaichi administration is pursuing a path that could lead the country into war, including the intention to revise the constitution. It cannot be overlooked that they are trying to forcibly transform Japan into a nation capable of waging war. Under such circumstances, the public sense of crisis is growing stronger. Just a few days ago, on March 10, about 8,000 people gathered outside the National Diet building, chanting slogans such as 'No to war' and 'Stop trampling on the Constitution'," said Yoshiko Kira.
Ikue Nonaka, an honorary professor of Meiji University, said that an excessively high defense budget will squeeze funding for social security, education, and other sectors, thereby undermining people's quality of life.
"[The defense budget is said to be raised to] two percent or even three percent [of GDP]. However, due to limited fiscal resources, this will inevitably result in cuts to the social security budget, and the education budget will also be impacted," said Nonaka.
"I just mentioned the issue of sci-tech innovation, highlighting the significant decline in research capabilities of Japanese universities. Japan was once a world leader in many fields, but now it is struggling to maintain its position in the rankings. The main reason is that the budget allocated for basic research and university funding is insufficient. In this situation, expanding the defense budget would only exacerbate the problem -- not only would research capabilities decline further, but social security would also fall short of support, which means that people will have to to endure a more difficult life," she added.
Japanese politicians, scholars oppose military expansion, constitutional revision
