Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Gov't should spend more on people's welfare rather than defense: Japanese expert

China

China

China

Gov't should spend more on people's welfare rather than defense: Japanese expert

2026-04-08 17:14 Last Updated At:04-09 07:17

Japan should invest more in improving people's welfare, rather than in defense, a Japanese expert said in a comment on the country's budget for fiscal 2026.

Japan's parliament on Tuesday passed a record 122.31 trillion yen (around 772 billion U.S. dollars) budget for fiscal 2026, the first time in 11 years that the annual spending plan was not in place before the start of the fiscal year on April 1.

The general account budget hits a record high for the second consecutive year as welfare expenditure rises amid Japan's aging population. The Japanese government has also earmarked more than 9 trillion yen for defense-related purposes for the first time, drawing public criticism.

Jusen Asuka, a professor at Tohoku University, said Japan is likely to spend the money on weapons purchase from the United States, which is not an effective way of using the funds.

"From the perspective of 'how to use money to improve the lives of the people,' I would rather spend the money on subsidies for developing solar energy and electric vehicles, and other subsidies to promote energy conservation than on defense expenses. I hope these subsidies can increase significantly. Moreover, from an economic perspective, even if the funds are invested in the defense industry, it may not effectively boost Japan's gross domestic product because in this sector, Japan is more likely to purchase weapons from the United States. The funds actually flowed to the United States, which is not an efficient way of using the funds," he said.

Asuka said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi administration's push to revise Japan's Constitution has drawn public opposition, warning that Japan should prevent itself from repeating the mistakes of the past.

The Constitution, which took effect in 1947, is often referred to as the pacifist Constitution because Article 9 states that the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.

"Takaishi stated a long time ago that she wanted to promote constitutional revision. After she took power, she is putting it into practice. Of course, I oppose it. There are the things, including the Constitution, that Japan has always adhered to. I think changing them would cause some problems. Takaichi has always advocated amending the Constitution, and I also hope to stop it," he said.

"In fact, many people oppose constitutional revision. Protests have been held in many places across Japan. Recently, there was a large-scale rally in front of the National Diet. It is not completely impossible for Japan to repeat the mistakes of the past. Therefore, it is very important to prevent this situation from happening," Asuka added.

Gov't should spend more on people's welfare rather than defense: Japanese expert

Gov't should spend more on people's welfare rather than defense: Japanese expert

Residents in the Iranian capital Tehran have welcomed the ceasefire agreement reached with the United States, but also voiced concerns over how long it might hold.

After some 40 days of deadly clashes, the United States and Iran on Wednesday agreed to a two-week ceasefire, and committed to begin a new round of peace consultations in Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan, on Friday.

On Wednesday afternoon, the number of vehicles and pedestrians in Tehran had increased significantly from previous days, and many shops that had been closed during the war were gradually reopening.

Tehran residents said they hoped that the ceasefire will hold and peace and stability will be restored.

"I am truly pleased to see so many people on the streets. The number of people is two to three times that of the previous days, which really makes me happy," said resident Hesam.

Many Iranians said that they support any action that serves Iran's national interests, but said they do not trust the U.S. as a negotiating partner following previous rounds of talks.

"A ceasefire is a good thing as long as it serves the interests of the Iranian people. However, we have already negotiated with the United States several times without reaching an agreement. If a ceasefire is merely a continuation of these fruitless negotiations, then it is meaningless. But we must continue negotiations so that the other side understands Iran's specific demands. All the terms proposed by Iran should be implemented; only under these circumstances will a ceasefire be a good thing," said Jafar.

The United Nations Security Council on Tuesday failed to adopt a draft resolution on the Strait of Hormuz. Eleven members of the Security Council voted in favor of the draft resolution, China and Russia voted against it, while Colombia and Pakistan abstained.

Ibrahim, a Tehran resident, said that China's action reflected its image as a responsible major power.

"It is a very good thing if a powerful country can play its role in the Middle East situation, and a major country like China has made its voice heard," he said.

Tehran residents welcome ceasefire with U.S. but concerns remain

Tehran residents welcome ceasefire with U.S. but concerns remain

Recommended Articles