Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

One Tech Tip: What to know about flying with lithium ion portable battery chargers

TECH

One Tech Tip: What to know about flying with lithium ion portable battery chargers
TECH

TECH

One Tech Tip: What to know about flying with lithium ion portable battery chargers

2026-06-04 12:00 Last Updated At:12:13

Jetting off soon for summer travels? If you're planning on bringing an extra battery charger for your phone or other devices, be aware of the latest rules when taking one on a flight.

Rechargeable lithium-ion portable battery chargers, also known as power banks, come in protective enclosures of various shapes and sizes. They're a handy and popular way for getting more juice when you're on the move.

But after a spate of smoke or fire incidents, U.S. and international aviation authorities have issued new guidelines and airlines have tightened up rules for passengers.

Here's a guide on flying with power banks.

The most important thing to know is that you can't pack lithium battery chargers in your checked luggage. They need to go in your carry-on luggage.

Travelers can generally bring two lithium ion power banks with a capacity of 100 watt hours without needing airline approval. That's more than enough to charge a cellphone several times over.

For non-rechargeable lithium metal batteries, the limit is two grams of lithium per battery. AA and AAA batteries typically contain less than a gram of lithium.

Those limits cover nearly all types of lithium batteries in an average person's electronic devices, according to the the Federal Aviation Authority.

The FAA says newer lithium ion batteries should have a label with the watt hour, or Wh, rating. But if your power bank's energy capacity is listed in milliampere hours, or mAH, you'll need to do some math, or use the FAA's online calculator.

To figure out your battery’s watt-hour rating, take the mAH number, divide it by 1,000 to get ampere hours, and then multiply by the device’s voltage, which is usually 3.7 volts. For example, a battery with 10,000 milliampere hour rating is equal to 10 ampere hours. Multiply that by 3.7 volts and you get 37 watt hours.

Passengers will need airline approval for bigger lithium-ion batteries, with a capacity of 100 to 160 watt hours, such as those used in professional video gear or medical equipment.

Airlines are taking the risk of lithium battery fires seriously after a rash of incidents.

One of the worst happened in January 2025 when a fire broke out on an Air Busan plane waiting to take off from an airport in South Korea, forcing the evacuation of all 176 people aboard.

The FAA lists nine lithium battery air incidents so far this year, including six that involved power banks.

Concerns about the batteries have been enough to disrupt flights even when there were no signs of a problem. Last month, an Easyjet flight from Egypt to Britain diverted to Rome as a precaution after a passenger told the crew that they had a power bank in checked luggage charging a device.

Lithium batteries in a jet's cargo hold pose a danger because if there's smoke or fire, the crew can’t take immediate action to identify and extinguish it, according to the International Air Transport Association, or IATA.

Keeping them in the cabin makes it easier for the crew to stop a potential blaze by using fire-resistant bags and insulated gloves to contain an overheating device.

There's a very low risk that a lithium ion battery will short-circuit and cause a fire, but if it does the hazard it creates is “very horrible," said Paul Christensen, a professor of pure and applied electrochemistry at the University of Newcastle in the United Kingdom.

Lithium batteries can store ”a huge amount of energy in a very small space,” Christensen said. The risk comes when a battery is crushed, overcharged or overheated. That can trigger what’s called “thermal runaway,” a chemical reaction that produces heat and toxic gases, he said.

Christensen recommends checking your power bank for any signs of damage. If it’s bulging or getting very hot when charging, those could be signs it has a problem.

He also advises avoiding cheap power banks from unknown manufacturers, which might not have proper quality controls to prevent defects or contamination. Shoddy lithium batteries can “produce thermal runaway a long time after they’ve been purchased,” he said.

Once you're on board, airlines have strict rules on handling power banks in the passenger cabin.

You can't put it in the overhead bin. Instead you'll have to keep it somewhere you can get it to quickly, such as in the seatback pocket or under the seat in front of you.

Don’t use it to charge other devices during flight, and don't recharge it using the aircraft’s on-board power sockets.

If a battery — or battery-powered device — slips down the side of your seat, don't move the seat to try to get it.

“Seats can crush or damage the battery, which could cause it to overheat or catch fire,” IATA says. Instead, call a cabin crew member because they're trained to retrieve devices safely.

The FAA says individual airlines and international rules could be more restrictive than U.S. regulations, so if in doubt, it’s best to check with your airline. Southwest Airlines, for example, said in April that it would limit passengers to one charger each.

Many carriers have a detailed list of rules for various battery types, including lithium-powered devices like laptops, tablets and e-cigarettes.

Is there a tech topic that you think needs explaining? Write to us at onetechtip@ap.org with your suggestions for future editions of One Tech Tip.

A United Airlines passenger jet approaches Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, Wednesday, May 20, 2026. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

A United Airlines passenger jet approaches Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, Wednesday, May 20, 2026. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement plans to keep one of its largest and most expensive detention facilities open for at least another year despite calls to close it over reported human rights abuses, according to a notice published last week.

ICE plans to extend the no-bid contract of the firm that runs Camp East Montana in El Paso, Texas, through Sept. 30, 2027, at a potential additional cost to taxpayers of $776 million, the notice says. This is on top of a $452 million initial contract that the firm, Amentum Services Inc., was awarded in March when it was hastily installed to take over the camp’s operation from a contractor removed for poor performance.

For months, Democratic members of Congress and several advocacy organizations have called for Camp East Montana to be closed, citing reports that detainees have been routinely mistreated since its opening in August 2025.

A report released earlier this month by Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union alleged that staff routinely beat detainees, denied them medical care, made them live in filthy conditions and fed them inedible meals. Reports by federal agencies have also found unsafe detention conditions and that the Army and ICE have wasted millions of dollars paying for unnecessary services. At least three Camp East Montana detainees have died.

The facility at Fort Bliss, an Army base near the U.S.-Mexico border, has housed an average of more than 2,000 male and female detainees a day since Oct. 1, though its population has declined significantly in recent months, according to ICE data.

“Extending Amentum’s contract while ignoring well-documented abuses is reckless and demonstrates the Trump administration’s full-scale assault on human rights,” said Angélica César, a fellow at Human Rights Watch and the ACLU who was a lead researcher for the report. “Instead of holding private contractors accountable, DHS is choosing to perpetuate a system of harm and abuse.”

Chanel Mann, a spokesperson for Amentum, referred questions to ICE and its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, which didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment.

ICE's notice was a justification for extending Amentum Services’ contract for a year without a competitive bidding process.

The agency argued that relocating detainees to other facilities would be “impracticable” due to a lack of available bed space elsewhere. Transitioning to a different contractor would require replacing Amentum’s “proprietary infrastructure” and finding new workers, which would lead to duplicative costs, it said.

“Any lapse in contract coverage would directly threaten the life, safety, and well-being of detainees, severely disrupt law enforcement operations, and expose the government to substantial operational, legal, and humanitarian risks,” the notice says.

ICE's notice said the Army's initial contract, awarded to Acquisition Logistics LLC, “did not accurately reflect ICE's operational needs or the actual usage of the facility.” Acquisition Logistics had no prior experience operating detention facilities.

In all, Virginia-based Amentum stands to be paid more than $1.2 billion if it operates the camp from March 2026 through September 2027, the notice says.

FILE - A sign marks the entrance to a series of hardened tents at the Camp East Montana immigrant detention center in the desert at a U.S. Army base on the outskirts of El Paso, Texas, Feb. 13, 2026. (AP Photo/Morgan Lee, File)

FILE - A sign marks the entrance to a series of hardened tents at the Camp East Montana immigrant detention center in the desert at a U.S. Army base on the outskirts of El Paso, Texas, Feb. 13, 2026. (AP Photo/Morgan Lee, File)

Recommended Articles