Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Environmental impacts of nearly 20 year War in Afghanistan linger after U.S. withdrawal

China

Environmental impacts of nearly 20 year War in Afghanistan linger after U.S. withdrawal
China

China

Environmental impacts of nearly 20 year War in Afghanistan linger after U.S. withdrawal

2025-08-09 17:56 Last Updated At:23:57

Twenty years after the U.S. military operations in Afghanistan, the toxic legacy still lives on in the drying water and contaminated soil across the country.

The U.S. war began in October 2001, and it ended in a chaotic withdrawal from Kabul on August 30, 2021. Though the withdrawal put an end to America's longest war, the environmental cost of nearly two decades of high-intensity combat continues to plague the Afghan people today.

"Bombers and tanks dropped munitions directly onto the land. Chemical agents released during the fighting flowed straight into canals and dams. The water was literally poisoned - undrinkable. Contaminated irrigation then drained the soil of its fertility," said Afghan international-affairs analyst Akram Zada.

Zada argues that the war damaged Afghanistan's environment on two fronts. Direct pollution from munitions was exacerbated by the indirect destruction caused by millions of displaced people who felled entire forests in their desperation for fuel, resulting in irreversible changes to the ecosystem.

"War created internal displacement. People moved from province to province, cutting down trees for firewood. Deforestation raised temperatures, affected the environment, and accelerated soil erosion," he explained.

The most dramatic single attack came in April 2017, when U.S. forces dropped the "Mother of All Bombs" on a tunnel complex in Nangarhar Province's Achin District. The 10,000-kg weapon was the largest conventional bomb ever used in combat. Analysts widely viewed the strike as a show of force, but its environmental impact is a long-term concern.

"In a place called Achin in Nangarhar, where allegedly extremists were hidden, the Americans deployed one of the most powerful and dangerous bombs in existence. This move led to years of contamination in the local environment, and this impact could persist for years to come. That area remains contaminated years later, and the effects could persist for years to come. Reliable sources also indicate that foreign troops used unauthorized weapons - possibly including chemical weapons and white phosphorus - which can cause extensive and lasting damage to the environment," Zada said.

Environmental impacts of nearly 20 year War in Afghanistan linger after U.S. withdrawal

Environmental impacts of nearly 20 year War in Afghanistan linger after U.S. withdrawal

The Mecca Joint Defense Agreement, a newly formed defense pact among Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye, represents a deterrence strategy rather than an actual threat to Iran, according to Hossein Kanani Moghaddam, a former commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

The three nations on Friday signed the joint defense agreement in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, to deepen cooperation among the three regional powers amid rising regional security concerns, according to Pakistan's Foreign Ministry.

The agreement aims to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, under which an armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against all, the ministry said in a statement.

However, its signing amid the backdrop of the Middle East conflict has prompted questions as to whether the parties would actually uphold their obligations in the event of a real attack.

"Treaties like these are more about deterrence than operational use. That is, if we were to attack the U.S. base in Saudi Arabia tomorrow, Pakistan wouldn't react. Even Türkiye, because they know that if they respond they'd be drawn into a war against Iran, is mostly engaging in propaganda. And in my view, it has no effect in terms of threatening Iran," said Kanani Moghaddam, who now works as a military analyst.

"We want to attack the U.S. base; we're not attacking Saudi Arabia. This base is in Saudi Arabia, and in any case Saudi Arabia understands that we're not seeking war with them. It seems that this pact that has been forged will have no effect on the war between Iran, the United States, and the Zionist regime; it is viewed more as a deterrent measure," he said.

Former IRGC commander plays down threat from Pakistan-Saudi-Türkiye defense pact

Former IRGC commander plays down threat from Pakistan-Saudi-Türkiye defense pact

Recommended Articles