Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Following Jimmy Lai’s millions…

Blog

Following Jimmy Lai’s millions…
Blog

Blog

Following Jimmy Lai’s millions…

2026-02-18 15:19 Last Updated At:15:19

Before Jimmy Lai was arrested in 2020, it was believed he was worth HK$9.3 billion. Today much of that has dwindled considerably due to bank seizures of his assets and the millions he poured into his anti-Hong Kong campaigns.

Court records show that during the uprisings from 2013 to 2020, Lai spent more than $160 million paying off the rioters, politicians and promotional campaigns in his fight against Hong Kong. Of this, some $93.26 million was for “donation to Hong Kong’s opposition camp.” Another $26.70 million was paid to Jack Keane (former US Army general with access to the White House), Paul Wolfowitz (former US deputy secretary for defence), and Rupert Hammond-Chambers (US-Taiwan Business Council president). American think tanks received up to $389,000 per year as a “donation”. And millions more were spent on advertising and editorial space in major newspapers throughout the world.

Much of the payments were made by Lai himself and through his navy intelligence associate Mark Simon.
When local banks froze his accounts in February 2021, Lai used his Canadian cash cow LAIS Hotel Properties Ltd and Dico Consultants Ltd. Indeed, it is the Canadian interests that is paying his current “Release Jimmy Lai” campaign.
Among Lai's assets that were targeted included local bank accounts of three companies owned by him as well as the 71.26 per cent stake in Next Digital worth around $350 million. In fact, Lai had earned some $1.9 billion in shareholder funds from Next Digital, one of his companies frozen by the banks between 2001 and when Apple Daily ceased its operations in 2021.

The records show that he paid Catholic Cardinal Zen Ze-kiun $3.5 million as a “donation.” But it was an established fact that Zen, together with Margaret Ng Ngoi-yee, pop singer Denise Ho Wan-see, Hui Po-keung and legislator Cyd Ho Sau-lan ran the “612 Humanitarian Relief Fund” to assist the legal fees of rioters who were arrested in the anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (ELAB) movement. At its height, the Fund had raised $140 million to pay the arrested rioters’ legal fees, medical bills and other expenses. All trustees were arrested for colluding with foreign forces.

Indeed, the guilty verdict, handed down by the three judges – Esther Toh, Alex Lee and Susana Maria D’Almada Remedios – documented a tangled web carefully spun by Lai involving a cluster of companies to fund his attempts to overthrow the Hong Kong Government. The 855-page document showed the dedication in which the judges arrived at their conclusions. Every detail was carefully explained, and every dollar was accounted for.

Once Lai’s accounts in Hong Kong were frozen, he turned to the LAIS group of companies in Canada acquired by his twin sister Si Wai and included properties in the Southern Ontario wine and vacation region of Niagara-on-the Lake as well as properties in Caledon and Jordan (also in Ontario). Leading financial source of corporate information, Dun and Bradstreet, lists Mark Simon as chief executive officer for the group, which gave him access to the Lai fortunes in Canada. It listed Simon as residing in Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
Simon had given Wayland Chan Tsz-wah (a paralegal and member of the “Fight for Freedom, Stand with Hong Kong” group) $30,000 for promoting the 2019 riots and through the LAIS hotels, spent $5.1 million on foreign media outlets in global campaigns to promote the 2019 riots. Money was no object for the Lai campaign and millions were spent on print media, as well as a large amount being spent on social media with a dedicated website providing links for people to join from Australia, Canada, Germany, Denmark, France, Ireland, Japan, South Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, United Kingdom and the United States. In the US link, it urged viewers to ask senators to implement and enforce sanctions against Hong Kong. And in the UK and other sites, it urged viewers to participate in local rallies against Hong Kong.

At the height of the riots in 2019, a massive advertising campaign blanked the world, including the United States (New York Times and New York Times (global)), Canada (The Globe and Mail), Japan (Nikkei), Australia (The Australian), Taiwan (The Liberty Times), Finland (Sanoma), Denmark (Berlingske), Sweden (Dagens Industri and Dagens Nyheter), France (Le Monde), Germany (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) the UK ( The Guardian, The Times, Evening Standard, City A.M., The Week and The Economist), South Korea (Kyunghyang Shinmun), Spain (El Mundo) and Italy (Corriere della Sera). More than $1 million was spent on ad space in the UK alone and more than $4 million in other newspapers. All of the advertising costs were paid for from the LAIS Hotel group.
After the arrests of Lai and others, the international campaign against Hong Kong ceased and instead a “free Jimmy Lai” campaign surfaced, spearheaded by one of his six children, Sebastien. Two of his siblings, Ian (now 45) and Timothy (48) were arrested in Hong Kong during police raids of Next Digital in 2020. They were later charged with fraud offences and released on bail.

Sebastien, based in London, had not spoken to his father for four years prior to the launch of the campaign last year. Since then and with money to burn, Sebastien travelled the world with his team of public relations-cum-international legal team – Doughty Street Chambers – seeking help from foreign governments, senior politicians and the press for his father’s release, citing Lai senior’s poor health, even though Lai’s defence counsel told the court he was being well treated.

The judges are to be commended for their detailed findings, after hearing 156 days of evidence and sifting through 161 documents. Despite extreme pressure from foreign forces, the judges produced their findings without fear or favour. They are a credit to Hong Kong’s judicial system and proved the point that money cannot buy everything.




Mark Pinkstone

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

When China’s Paramount Leader Deng Xiao Ping floated the idea of one country two systems for the future of Hong Kong, the west scoffed at the possibility of a communist regime and a capitalist bastion living hand in hand. Some 29 years later the prophets of doom were proven wrong as Hong Kong is now more prosperous than ever and it’s future will be more so.

For more than 150 years Hong Kong lived under a British colonial rule. There was no democracy, only authoritarian management. The succession of ruling governors were hand-picked by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and appointed by the Prime Minister, without any consultation with the people of Hong Kong.

But the people of Hong Kong didn’t mind. If they had never seen democracy, how could they miss it. The governors were diplomats and their upper-crust training ensured that the natives were happy and that their rice bowls were filled. The diplomats got on well with the Chinese government as they knew that harmony was the key component to a successful relationship.

Then came along a politician for the first time to run Hong Kong in the name of Chris Patten, who had lost his seat in the Bath electorate, about 156 km west of London. John Major was Prime Minister at the time and a good friend of Patten. So, to make up for the political loss in Bath, Major offered Patten the cushy job of being governor of Hong Kong.

In 1992 Patten and his family arrived in Hong Kong and as a typical politician, he arrived like a bull in a china shop (pun intended). There was no diplomacy involved. Patten and Major had decided that the foreign office diplomats were pussy-footing with the Chinese during the previous decade negotiating Hong Kong’s future and a firmer stand was necessary.

Unlike his predecessors, Patten knew nothing of Chinese traditions and customs. He just could not understand Chinese mentality and that applied not only to the mainlanders but also the local Chinese. The East is East and the West is West and never the twain shall meet wrote poet Rudyard Kipling in 1889. But, in Hong Kong they did.

The Joint Declaration between Great Britain and China on the future of Hong Kong and the subsequent Basic Law (Hong Kong’s mini constitution) provided the pathway for Hong Kong’s future, including democratic elections for the city’s legislative council. But Patten was impatient and decided to introduce a fully elected legislature in 1995 immediately before the handover in 1997. This infuriated the Chinese-side, and they provided for a provisional legislature to replace Patten’s council as soon as Hong Kong was reverted to Beijing’s administration.

After 1997, Hong Kong formed its first directly elected Legislative Council in 1998, while the Chief Executive is elected by an Election Committee — a system similar to the U.S. presidential election. Hong Kong's Election Committee now has 1,500 members, whereas the U.S. Electoral College has only 538 members.

Since then, Hong Kong has flourished. The prophets of doom and Kipling were wrong. Despite many attempts by the west to dismantle the Deng formula Hong Kong is one of the most successful places on the planet. Year after year it is breaking records to the envy of many. Hong Kong has secured third place in the Global Financial Centres Index. In the latest World Competitiveness Ranking, Hong Kong's position has risen one spot further to rank second globally. And in the World Talent Ranking, Hong Kong has moved up 10 places to rank the fourth globally and the first in Asia. Hong Kong also continues to come first as the world's freest economy. And Hong Kong has what many want – stability.

The Hong Kong formula is unique and successful. Never tried before, it was seen as an experiment and the world was watching, waiting for it to fail. But the Hong Kong people are resourceful and will take any challenge head on. There is no failure.

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), established under the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Constitution, has maintained the previous capitalist system and way of life. Its common law system continues to operate, and it enjoys the free flow of people, capital, data, goods and more. The vibrancy and prosperity of the central government has always been Hong Kong's strongest backing.

Hong Kong’s 29th birthday under the PRC guidance, coincides with the 105th Anniversary of the Founding of the Communist Party of China. Naturally there have been celebrations all round, and justifiably so. Both Hong Kong and the central government are proud of what they have achieved. And both, particularly in the past year have taken top ranking as the preferred place in the world to trust and to do business.

Chief Executive John Lee, at a celebratory function on July 1 summed it up with: “Hong Kong, the Pearl of the Orient, will ride the wave of flourishing national development and sail with the wind, steering towards a brighter and more prosperous future!”

And the future is being mapped out in Hong Kong’s first five-year plan, currently under consultation with the public. The plan, a road map for future leaders to follow, will include a futuristic block of land, one third of Hong Kong’s total, to house high tech innovative research and development facilities with university, hospital and new town ancillary services. This Northern Metropolis straddles the river that acts as the boundary between Hong Kong and neighboring Shenzhen, with bridges linking the two; further proof that Hong Kong is an integral part of China.

Recommended Articles