In the latest episode of The Beacon Chronicles—"The Allies' Rebellion"—the story takes a thrilling turn: US President Trump orders the US military to bomb Iran in the Middle East, hoping to rally European allies. Instead, they collectively "play dead." Spain and Italy first closed their doors, and now even French President Macron has gone to Japan to openly accuse the US of "lacking military ethics." Furious, Trump lashed out on social media, threatening to quit NATO and calling it a "paper tiger." What was meant as an "America First" war has awkwardly become an "America Only" fiasco.
Act One: Macron’s Sarcastic Shot at the US in Japan: “Europe is ‘predictable’—how about you?”
French President Macron recently visited Japan, addressing Japanese business leaders with a tone thick in sarcasm. Though he didn’t name names, everyone understood who was on the receiving end.
He said: “I'm well aware that sometimes Europe can be seen as a continent that is slower than others. But predictability has value…we are where you know we will go,” Then he shifted, criticizing some countries that claim to “act faster,” saying, “you don't know whether the day after tomorrow they will still be in that position, and whether tomorrow they won't make a decision that could hurt you without even informing you.”
Put plainly: Europe may be slow, but it’s reliable; you Americans may be fast, but you flip sides quicker than turning a page—and constantly stab your own team in the back!
Macron spoke to his Japanese audience that "Europe stands by your side”. He said, “We are also on the side of international law, on the side of negotiation and the return of diplomacy." This statement effectively branded the US plan for a "forceful solution" as "illegal."
Act Two: Trump Rages, France Fires Back
Right after Macron's remarks, Trump erupted. On March 31, he posted on social media, singling out France: "The Country of France wouldn’t let planes headed to Israel, loaded up with military supplies, fly over French territory. France has been VERY UNHELPFUL with respect to the 'Butcher of Iran,' who has been successfully eliminated! The U.S.A. will REMEMBER!!!"
French officials wasted no time pushing back. A French military source told the press: this is completely false. France has not restricted US military flights in its airspace, and conditions for landing remain unchanged. The French presidential office expressed surprise: " France has not changed its position since the first day and we reaffirm this decision which is in line with the French position since the start of this conflict."
It turns out France had already drawn a firm red line: it will not approve US use of French bases for attacks on Iran but grants temporary approval if used to support regional allies’ defensive operations. Trump’s accusations are pure fabrications, revealing either a misunderstanding or disregard of allied policies.
Act Three: Quitting the 'Paper Tiger' - Trump Threatens NATO Exit
Trump’s fury erupted over his allies' lack of support. In an exclusive interview with the UK’s Daily Telegraph, he dropped a bombshell: he is seriously thinking about pulling the United States out of NATO because European countries have refused to back the US in the conflict with Iran.
He again labeled NATO a 'paper tiger,' declaring, ' I was never swayed by NATO. I always knew they were a paper tiger, and Putin knows that too.' Trump vented further frustration at European countries for failing to assist: ' We’ve been there automatically, including Ukraine. Ukraine wasn’t our problem. It was a test, and we were there for them…... They weren’t there for us.'
He went so far as to single out British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, mocking the Royal Navy: 'You don’t even have a navy. Your warships are too old, and the aircraft carriers keep having problems.' (Though the UK has two carriers, they have encountered multiple defects).
US Secretary of State Rubio also piled on, saying the post-war period demands 'a reassessment of relations with NATO,' and warning: without the United States, NATO is finished!
Conclusion: The Western farce
No followers for the Boss: Washington assumed its allies would automatically fall in line once it decided to strike. They didn't. They didn't just hold back — they closed the door entirely.
'Predictable' vs. 'fast': When Europe proudly claims 'predictability' as a virtue, the implication is pointed — the United States is unreliable and quick to turn on its own partners.
The paper tiger's roar: Trump branded NATO a 'paper tiger.' But from Europe's perspective, it's his own 'with me or out' ultimatums that are tearing the alliance apart — paper claws and all.
The 'collective defense' bind: NATO's Article 5 commits all members to respond when one is attacked. This time, the United States wasn't the target of attack— it launched the strike. The treaty simply doesn't apply. European countries have a pointed question: you picked this fight, so why should we foot the bill?
This saga reveals a stark truth: when "America First" slides into "America Alone," even the closest allies grow distant. Trump simultaneously brands NATO a "paper tiger" while expecting that very "tiger" to fight on his behalf. The contradiction is striking. It appears Washington’s "circle of friends" is undergoing a massive wave of disillusionment and backlash — yet the director cum star, Mr. Trump, seems blind to the fact that the fault lies with himself.
Beacon Institute
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **
Zambia has just wrapped up a deeply contentious general election. Yet Washington's script proved even more gripping than the vote itself.
President Hakainde Hichilema secured re-election with roughly 60 percent of the vote, defeating his main opposition challenger, Brian Mundubile. To be fair, observers widely believe he would most likely have won even without the controversy. The problem is that the process itself was far from pretty. Vote tallies were allegedly inflated. Soldiers and police intervened. Opposition figures were arrested.
More controversial still: the moment the deadline expired for the opposition to challenge the results, Zambia's courts were suddenly sealed off. The door to judicial appeal slammed shut. Mundubile and several of his allies were subsequently hit with treason charges. And Mutotwe Kafwaya, a former minister, was shot dead during a police operation targeting opposition figures.
Had this happened in a country that refuses to toe Washington's line, the familiar script would already be rolling. The State Department statement would have been drafted long ago: "grave concern," "condemnation of democratic backsliding," "urging respect for human rights." Unilateral sanctions on Hichilema and the Zambian government might well have followed.
But this time, the Trump administration chose a different path.
Frank Garcia, the US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, not only attended Hichilema's inauguration but also met privately with him. The State Department said it hopes to keep deepening its partnership with Zambia. As for the slain former minister, the shuttered courts and the opposition figures charged with treason, Washington simply "looked the other way."
The Answer Buried Underground
Why? The answer lies buried underground.
Zambia is one of Africa's most important copper producers. Copper accounts for around 70 percent of its export earnings. And with power-grid expansion, electric vehicles and AI data centers all driving up projections for copper demand, the metal is coming ever closer to being a strategic resource.
More critically, Zambia sits at the far end of the Lobito Corridor, a route Washington has spent years cultivating. The line is planned to run from the port of Lobito on Angola's Atlantic coast, through the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and all the way to Zambia's Copperbelt. One of its purposes is to move copper, cobalt and other minerals from south-central Africa to Western markets more easily.
Trump did not abandon this Biden-era project after taking office. In June this year, the US and Zambia even expanded a US$491 million aid program to cover critical-minerals infrastructure, funding road improvements along the Lobito Corridor.
Only a few months earlier, the two countries had publicly fallen out over minerals. Lusaka accused Washington of trying to bundle up to US$2 billion in health cooperation with preferential access for American companies to critical minerals, and flatly rejected those terms. In other words, the US has already demonstrated firsthand this year just how badly it wants into Zambia's mineral system.
Now, of course, the Trump administration will not pressure Hichilema over democracy. Cultivating a government that holds the copper, and controls a critical node of the Lobito Corridor, is what "American interests" really means.
The Stress Test of "Democracy Diplomacy"
The most riveting part of this show is not how transactional the Trump administration is. A businessman running a country with interests first is hardly surprising. The riveting part is that it has, quite by accident, run a stress test on the slogan of "democracy diplomacy."
For decades, the US has wielded "democracy," "human rights" and "free elections" as a diplomatic cudgel, swinging it at whichever country refuses to obey. But when that cudgel might land on an ally holding copper mines and railways, it suddenly grows feather-light. So light that Washington cannot even be bothered to utter a single phrase of "grave concern."
What Washington conceded was not the election result. After all, even observers admit Hichilema would most likely have won anyway. What it conceded was the entire package of procedural justice. The US put on a vivid demonstration: how a man wins does not matter. What matters is whether the winner is willing to talk copper.
For Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a vocal Trump challenger, the logic runs the other way. Opposing the Republicans matters more. She declared that Zambia's post-election violence and arbitrary arrests already amount to "democratic backsliding."
Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, demanded that Secretary of State Marco Rubio press for an investigation into Kafwaya's death and allow the courts to hear the election disputes. Against the Trump administration's hard-nosed calculus, these voices ring hollow and powerless.
Hichilema has probably figured this out too. For today's America, a Zambia that is less democratic but willing to talk copper and railways may well matter more. More than a Zambia whose political system better matches Washington's traditional values but refuses to cooperate on resources.
Business First, Democracy to the Back
This is the true ranking of democracy and human rights under an "America First" Africa policy: they are not principles but bargaining chips. When the chips can be traded for copper and corridors, they can be tucked away for now. When they buy nothing, they are hoisted high and swung like a club.
The Trump administration will never openly endorse Zambia's crackdown. That would look far too ugly. But its actions prove one thing: when business is on the table, democracy can move to the back of the queue. A US$491 million minerals-infrastructure program outweighs a diplomatic note about human rights. A single stretch of rail on the Lobito Corridor matters more than a slain opposition former minister.
So rather than calling this a contest over Africa diplomacy, it is better seen as a demon-revealing mirror. It lays bare the fathomless chasm between the political rhetoric of the US and the West and their real interests. The louder Washington shouts its "democracy" slogans, the more honest the copper beneath Zambia's soil appears. When it comes to real interests, every high-minded declaration is nothing more than a label that can be torn off at the weigh-in.
America has once again put on a masterclass in the beacon's double standards: business first, democracy to the back of the line. And the logic behind it is, of course, "America First."
