Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

US-Israeli war against Iran reaches 100-day mark

HotTV

HotTV

HotTV

US-Israeli war against Iran reaches 100-day mark

2026-06-07 12:13 Last Updated At:16:24

The U.S.-Israeli war against Iran reached its 100-day mark on Sunday, with peace remaining elusive in the Middle East region.

On Feb 28, the United States and Israel launched coordinated military strikes against Iran, hitting multiple locations including the capital Tehran, Isfahan, and Karaj. Iran's then-Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and several high-ranking officials were killed in the airstrikes.

In retaliation, Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) launched missiles and drones attack at U.S. military bases in the Middle East and Israeli targets on the same day.

According to information released by various sources, over the ensuing weeks, the U.S. military struck over 10,000 Iranian military targets, while the Israeli military hit several thousand Iranian targets. Iran launched 100 waves of retaliatory "Operation True Promise-4" strikes. The conflict spread to more than 10 countries across the Middle East.

After over a month of intense fighting, the United States and Iran announced a temporary ceasefire on April 8. Both sides held their first round of talks in Pakistan on April 11 and 12, but no substantive breakthrough was achieved.

In subsequent negotiations, the two countries engaged in intense discussions over issues including Iran's nuclear program and highly enriched uranium, the lifting of sanctions, the unfreezing of Iranian assets, and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. To date, no peace agreement has been reached.

On Feb 28, the IRGC announced a ban on any vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, bringing traffic to a halt on one of the world's most critical energy waterways. On May 30, Iran declared full operational and administrative management over shipping in the strait, requiring all commercial vessels, oil tankers, and other civilian ships to navigate designated routes and obtain prior permission from the IRGC Navy.

On the U.S. side, after the first round of U.S.-Iran talks ended without a breakthrough, the U.S. Central Command announced on April 13 that, effective that day, it would impose a blockade on all maritime traffic entering or leaving Iranian ports. The standoff between the United States and Iran over navigation rights in the Strait of Hormuz continues to this day.

As negotiations continue to stall, sporadic military clashes have begun to occur between the United States and Iran since last month, with the frequency of clashes intensifying since late May.

Since May 30, the United States has launched multiple strikes against Iranian targets along the coast of the Strait of Hormuz, while Iran has retaliated by repeatedly hitting U.S. military bases across the Middle East.

Following the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Feb 28, the Hezbollah group in Lebanon announced on March 2 that it had begun striking Israeli targets, reigniting the Lebanon-Israel conflict. The Israeli military launched airstrikes on multiple locations in Lebanon and carried out a ground invasion, taking control of large swaths of southern Lebanon.

On April 17, Lebanon and Israel, through U.S. mediation, announced a 10-day temporary ceasefire, which was subsequently extended several times. However, the Israeli military has continued operations in Lebanon.

Iran said the ceasefire agreement with the United States also covers Lebanon, and that the United States and Israel will be held accountable for any violations of the ceasefire.

US-Israeli war against Iran reaches 100-day mark

US-Israeli war against Iran reaches 100-day mark

Japan's ongoing push to revise its pacifist constitution and expand military buildup escalate regional tension, warned Japanese lawyer Kyoko Oe, who urged adherence to pacifism and vigilance against the government's dangerous moves.

Since Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi took office last October, the Japanese government has renewed its push to revise the country's pacifist constitution and accelerated a series of military expansion measures, including increasing defense spending, deploying long-range missiles, and easing restrictions on arms exports.

Speaking on the dangerous policy shifts, Oe criticized the Takaichi administration for bypassing public will.

"We believe that when Japanese citizens are not demanding constitutional reform, pushing it forward through a parliamentary majority clearly violates the principle of popular sovereignty and the obligation to respect the constitution. Moreover, the content of the revision itself is extremely dangerous. [The government] is attempting to change pacifist principles of the Japanese constitution -- the most fundamental part -- and abandon basic concepts, including the renunciation of war and not maintaining military forces," said Oe.

The Japanese government has aggressively accelerated war readiness even under the current constitution, said Oe, adding that amending it will grant the Self-Defense Forces even greater freedom of action at the constitutional level.

"If the constitution is amended, the Self-Defense Forces will gain greater freedom of action at the constitutional level than they have now, and legal interpretations will develop in that direction. Even while the current constitution remains effective, the Japanese government has already forcibly advanced war preparations. For example, manufacturing long-range missiles, which were previously considered unacceptable to possess, and deploying them domestically; conducting joint war games and military exercises with the United States; and massively manufacturing and exporting weapons overseas," said Oe.

The lawyer also criticized Takaichi's provocative remarks on China, saying they have sharply strained bilateral ties and undermined peace and stability in the region.

"We believe that due to Takaichi's remarks made last November, China-Japan relations have become very tense and are deteriorating. Legal experts believe that Takaichi's remarks contain multiple obvious errors. Takaichi should frankly retract the relevant remarks and apologize. Only by building mutual trust with neighboring countries can we maintain our peace, and the peace of East Asia and even the peace of Asia. We believe that what the Takaichi administration is doing runs completely counter to what the Japanese people truly wish to achieve," Oe said.

Japan's constitution revision, military buildup fuel regional tensions: lawyer

Japan's constitution revision, military buildup fuel regional tensions: lawyer

Recommended Articles