Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Press-Freedom Firestorm: Pentagon Launches "Mole Hunt" as White House Locks Down Reporters' Sources

Blog

Press-Freedom Firestorm: Pentagon Launches "Mole Hunt" as White House Locks Down Reporters' Sources
Blog

Blog

Press-Freedom Firestorm: Pentagon Launches "Mole Hunt" as White House Locks Down Reporters' Sources

2026-07-19 10:42 Last Updated At:10:42

America's press-freedom myth just took a serious hit. The Justice Department has subpoenaed four New York Times reporters over an alleged violation of federal criminal law. The FBI has opened its own investigation. Both moves target the paper's exposé on inadequate anti-missile defenses aboard the president's new plane.

Defense Secretary Hegseth unveils "mole-hunt squad," vowing to root out leakers feeding reporters.

Defense Secretary Hegseth unveils "mole-hunt squad," vowing to root out leakers feeding reporters.

The White House has long nursed grudges against the press. Now, in a fury, it has escalated from threats to outright intimidation, deploying subpoenas and detentions alike. As the saying goes, there is no smoke without fire. Someone inside government must be leaking, and that conviction pushed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to announce a special task force. Working hand-in-hand with the Justice Department, the task force aims to root out the "moles."

The showdown between the White House and the press is only heating up, and the real fireworks may still lie ahead.

Trump's sudden switch to the old Air Force One after NATO sparked media exposés, igniting his fury and a subpoena crackdown.

Trump's sudden switch to the old Air Force One after NATO sparked media exposés, igniting his fury and a subpoena crackdown.

The Plane-Swap Spark

The trigger behind this clash was the so-called "plane-swap incident." After Trump wrapped up the NATO summit in Turkey, his security team abruptly switched him onto the old Air Force One for departure. He skipped the new plane gifted by Qatar entirely, and that alone raised eyebrows.

The New York Times soon reported why. The new aircraft's missile-defense systems were inadequate, the paper said, posing a security risk that forced officials to fall back on the old plane. The White House flatly denied the report, and Trump reportedly flew into a rage. The Justice Department wasted no time, issuing subpoenas to the paper's reporters almost immediately.

There is more to this story. FBI agents reportedly showed up at the New York Times offices before the story even went to print. They demanded the paper pull the piece and reveal its sources.

The paper's leadership flatly refused. In response, the Justice Department broke with convention. Rather than identifying the leaker first, it went straight after the reporters with subpoenas, escalating pressure on the press.

This is not the first time the White House has tried to put reporters in the hot seat. Back in April, a US Air Force F-15E was shot down over Iranian airspace and the pilot went missing after ejecting. Both the New York Times and Axios covered the story.

Iran's military happened to launch a massive search operation around the same time. Whether the two events were connected remains unclear. Still, Trump was quick to blame the media, threatening to jail both the reporters and the leaker.

The White House apparently could not find hard evidence, so it ultimately took no action. That failure only deepened its resentment toward the press, and officials waited for the right moment to strike back hard. This time, the plane-swap incident gave the administration its pretext to wield the legal hammer, and it is determined to teach reporters a lesson they will not forget.

The Pentagon's "Mole Hunt"

The crackdown on "moles" by the Defense Department and the Justice Department has also ramped up. Hegseth posted a video on X yesterday announcing that the Pentagon has teamed up with the Justice Department to form a special task force. Its mission: hunt down whoever has been feeding information to the media, and anyone caught with solid evidence will face the full force of the law.

He said the Pentagon's Office of General Counsel can now require any department unit to hand over information and records tied to leak investigations within 48 hours. Full cooperation is mandatory, with no room for delay or evasion. He also issued a stern warning, declaring that "access to confidential and secret information is a sacred trust, and those who betray that trust will be met with the full force of the law".

Both Hegseth and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche are die-hard Trump loyalists. That alone signals this crackdown comes directly from Trump himself, and it is designed to make heads roll, with some officials facing criminal charges. Even without hard evidence, suspects are still likely to be pushed out of their jobs.

The Pentagon has done this before. Last year it investigated several leak cases, resulting in a number of officials being suspended, including Deputy Chief of Staff Darin Selnick and Senior Adviser Dan Caldwell. Both have since quietly disappeared from their posts.

A Hunt That Cannot Succeed

Some analysts point out a hard truth. Hegseth may be on the warpath, but the Pentagon's "mole problem" could prove impossible to fully stamp out. Since Trump's return and Hegseth's takeover of the Defense Department, internal personnel purges have stirred up widespread resentment, making it easy for reporters to find disgruntled insiders willing to talk. With so many potential leakers around, there is no way to seal every crack.

Hegseth himself is not exactly clean either. Shortly after taking office, he got caught up in the "Signalgate" scandal, leaking secret plans for a US strike on Houthi forces in a group chat. That controversy caused quite the uproar. Having broken the rules himself, how can he expect his subordinates to keep their mouths shut without complaint?

Perhaps the funniest comment came from a netizen who suggested the task force should start by investigating the bartender at Hegseth's favorite watering hole. Given his well-known fondness for drink, the odds of him spilling military secrets over a few rounds are hardly low. In the end, they might just discover that the real "leaker" was Hegseth all along.




What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

US elections are a money game. One of the key factors deciding who wins is how much ammunition the deep-pocketed backers behind each side bring to the fight. Those backers each run their own calculations of interest, and none of them spends on anything that promises no return.
 
A $366 Million Bet to Hold Congress
The New York Times disclosed that Elon Musk, the world's richest man, has so far invested a total of US$366 million (about HK$2.85 billion) to help Republicans win the midterm elections and keep control of Congress. That outlay makes him the Republican Party's biggest donor.
 
Behind this heavy bet sits a hard-headed calculation. If Democrats retake control of Congress, they will certainly launch a "great reckoning" against him, and his business empire will take the hit. So Musk must keep pumping in more money to help Republicans reverse the disadvantage. Lose this gamble, and he is in deep trouble.

Musk's mega-donations to GOP: self-defense against Democrats.

Musk's mega-donations to GOP: self-defense against Democrats.

Musk is a businessman to his core. He never throws money around blindly. He sizes up the situation first, then decides how much to pump in.
 
According to sources, he donated US$276 million to the Republican Party after July this year. The party's electoral position had clearly turned urgent, so he hastily fired off heavy-caliber money shells to boost the vote.
 
Musk in particular poured huge sums into the Senate Leadership Fund to help Republicans hold their Senate majority.
 
One US research institution, drawing on the latest polls, projects that Democrats have a chance to gain 2 to 6 Senate seats. If they ultimately gain 4 seats, they take control.

The House elections look even grimmer for Republicans. Fox News estimates that Democrats could take 237 House seats, while Republicans may muster only 198.
 
Unless Republicans break through in some key districts, they have little hope of drawing even. That is why Musk is burning with anxiety and accelerating his heavy spending to aid the campaign.

Texas on the Line: Musk Buys a Ground Game
Texas is where Elon Musk has the most skin in the game. His empire has been expanding aggressively across the state, with Tesla, X and even the aerospace giant SpaceX all holding major investments there.
 
Now the race itself is giving him chills. Republican Senate candidate and state Attorney General Ken Paxton is wobbling, under strong challenge from his Democratic opponent Talarico. The rising star polls at 48.5 percent, 3.4 points ahead of Paxton, and could charge to victory as a dark horse at any moment.
 
To reverse the Republican Party's perilous slide, one ingredient is crucial: "money."

US media report that Musk has been pumping still more cash into a "political action committee," hiring thousands of "canvassers" across multiple states to go door to door campaigning for Republican candidates.
 
Texas shows how the meter runs. Every door knocked that draws an answer earns the canvasser $1.5 to $3. The tab is anything but small.
 
That tally still excludes the money for media promotion, campaign rallies and street-level canvassing.
 
When the final hour arrives, Musk looks set to load up still more silver bullets to turn back the tide.
 
Democrats Show Their Cards: Three Investigations

Musk's all-in bet on the Republican Party this time has deeply personal roots.
 
The reason: Democratic lawmakers have already laid their cards on the table. If they retake control of Congress, they will launch multiple investigations against him, and the offensive will be fierce.
 
First, Democrats have resented Musk to the bone for reaping enormous benefits from Trump's "favor." They have vowed to investigate how he, as SpaceX CEO, secured billions of dollars in federal government contracts through insider connections.
 
They will also pursue whether those operations involved conflicts of interest.
 
Second, after Trump's return to power, Musk was appointed head of the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE). He marched a band of IT "Red Guards" into government departments to conduct audits. Democrats have long questioned whether he abused his power to obtain classified government data in violation of national security regulations.
 
If Democrats succeed in seizing power, they will certainly dredge up the old score and hound him relentlessly.

Democrats target Musk over classified data access.

Democrats target Musk over classified data access.

Third, Democratic members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have already accused Musk's AI company of violating regulations and harming the environment and public health as it built data centers in Tennessee and elsewhere. That score, too, may be settled later.
 
The outcome is easy to foresee. If Congress flips, Musk will find trouble swarming all over him.
 
He and Trump will then face interrogation and a reckoning from his "enemies," and his empire will also take a heavy hit.
 
Self-Preservation, Not Charity
Elon Musk is splashing cash at the eleventh hour of the midterm elections, aiming to help Republicans turn the tide. When it comes down to it, the spending is really about sparing himself a crisis.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles