Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Press-Freedom Firestorm: Pentagon Launches "Mole Hunt" as White House Locks Down Reporters' Sources

Blog

Press-Freedom Firestorm: Pentagon Launches "Mole Hunt" as White House Locks Down Reporters' Sources
Blog

Blog

Press-Freedom Firestorm: Pentagon Launches "Mole Hunt" as White House Locks Down Reporters' Sources

2026-07-19 10:42 Last Updated At:10:42

America's press-freedom myth just took a serious hit. The Justice Department has subpoenaed four New York Times reporters over an alleged violation of federal criminal law. The FBI has opened its own investigation. Both moves target the paper's exposé on inadequate anti-missile defenses aboard the president's new plane.

Defense Secretary Hegseth unveils "mole-hunt squad," vowing to root out leakers feeding reporters.

Defense Secretary Hegseth unveils "mole-hunt squad," vowing to root out leakers feeding reporters.

The White House has long nursed grudges against the press. Now, in a fury, it has escalated from threats to outright intimidation, deploying subpoenas and detentions alike. As the saying goes, there is no smoke without fire. Someone inside government must be leaking, and that conviction pushed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to announce a special task force. Working hand-in-hand with the Justice Department, the task force aims to root out the "moles."

The showdown between the White House and the press is only heating up, and the real fireworks may still lie ahead.

Trump's sudden switch to the old Air Force One after NATO sparked media exposés, igniting his fury and a subpoena crackdown.

Trump's sudden switch to the old Air Force One after NATO sparked media exposés, igniting his fury and a subpoena crackdown.

The Plane-Swap Spark

The trigger behind this clash was the so-called "plane-swap incident." After Trump wrapped up the NATO summit in Turkey, his security team abruptly switched him onto the old Air Force One for departure. He skipped the new plane gifted by Qatar entirely, and that alone raised eyebrows.

The New York Times soon reported why. The new aircraft's missile-defense systems were inadequate, the paper said, posing a security risk that forced officials to fall back on the old plane. The White House flatly denied the report, and Trump reportedly flew into a rage. The Justice Department wasted no time, issuing subpoenas to the paper's reporters almost immediately.

There is more to this story. FBI agents reportedly showed up at the New York Times offices before the story even went to print. They demanded the paper pull the piece and reveal its sources.

The paper's leadership flatly refused. In response, the Justice Department broke with convention. Rather than identifying the leaker first, it went straight after the reporters with subpoenas, escalating pressure on the press.

This is not the first time the White House has tried to put reporters in the hot seat. Back in April, a US Air Force F-15E was shot down over Iranian airspace and the pilot went missing after ejecting. Both the New York Times and Axios covered the story.

Iran's military happened to launch a massive search operation around the same time. Whether the two events were connected remains unclear. Still, Trump was quick to blame the media, threatening to jail both the reporters and the leaker.

The White House apparently could not find hard evidence, so it ultimately took no action. That failure only deepened its resentment toward the press, and officials waited for the right moment to strike back hard. This time, the plane-swap incident gave the administration its pretext to wield the legal hammer, and it is determined to teach reporters a lesson they will not forget.

The Pentagon's "Mole Hunt"

The crackdown on "moles" by the Defense Department and the Justice Department has also ramped up. Hegseth posted a video on X yesterday announcing that the Pentagon has teamed up with the Justice Department to form a special task force. Its mission: hunt down whoever has been feeding information to the media, and anyone caught with solid evidence will face the full force of the law.

He said the Pentagon's Office of General Counsel can now require any department unit to hand over information and records tied to leak investigations within 48 hours. Full cooperation is mandatory, with no room for delay or evasion. He also issued a stern warning, declaring that "access to confidential and secret information is a sacred trust, and those who betray that trust will be met with the full force of the law".

Both Hegseth and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche are die-hard Trump loyalists. That alone signals this crackdown comes directly from Trump himself, and it is designed to make heads roll, with some officials facing criminal charges. Even without hard evidence, suspects are still likely to be pushed out of their jobs.

The Pentagon has done this before. Last year it investigated several leak cases, resulting in a number of officials being suspended, including Deputy Chief of Staff Darin Selnick and Senior Adviser Dan Caldwell. Both have since quietly disappeared from their posts.

A Hunt That Cannot Succeed

Some analysts point out a hard truth. Hegseth may be on the warpath, but the Pentagon's "mole problem" could prove impossible to fully stamp out. Since Trump's return and Hegseth's takeover of the Defense Department, internal personnel purges have stirred up widespread resentment, making it easy for reporters to find disgruntled insiders willing to talk. With so many potential leakers around, there is no way to seal every crack.

Hegseth himself is not exactly clean either. Shortly after taking office, he got caught up in the "Signalgate" scandal, leaking secret plans for a US strike on Houthi forces in a group chat. That controversy caused quite the uproar. Having broken the rules himself, how can he expect his subordinates to keep their mouths shut without complaint?

Perhaps the funniest comment came from a netizen who suggested the task force should start by investigating the bartender at Hegseth's favorite watering hole. Given his well-known fondness for drink, the odds of him spilling military secrets over a few rounds are hardly low. In the end, they might just discover that the real "leaker" was Hegseth all along.




What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

Five years ago, an emigration frenzy swept Hong Kong. Besides the Hong Kong BNO holders flooding into Britain, another group climbed aboard the Canadian government's "lifeboat." Back then Ottawa was full of righteous talk, promising Hong Kong people a way out and a safe harbor.

Five years on, the scheme officially ends today, but those who missed the boat need not sigh with regret. According to the latest figures, more than 40,000 Hong Kong people have been approved to come aboard. Yet over 35,000 of them are still adrift on the boat, permanent residency nowhere in sight, and they are expected to wait ten long years before reaching shore.

Canada's "lifeboat" ends; Hong Kong people protest 10-year PR wait.

Canada's "lifeboat" ends; Hong Kong people protest 10-year PR wait.

Many are trapped in limbo, hanging in mid-air: hard to stay, hard to leave, utterly at a loss. Their misery has one root cause. The Canadian government long ago had a "change of heart," and the "promise" of yesteryear has been swept aside by the politics of hard self-interest, vanishing like smoke.

From Morality to Money

To understand the present, look first at the history. When the Black Riots erupted in Hong Kong in 2019, the Central Authorities enacted the Hong Kong National Security Law to quell the turmoil. Keen to keep the flames of the "color revolution" burning, the US and Britain made provocative moves, including opening an "escape hatch" so the Hong Kong people involved could find shelter. The Canadian government duly fell in line with the Five Eyes brigade and launched the "lifeboat" scheme, under which Hong Kong people could apply for temporary residence.

The scheme kicked off in February 2021, and Hong Kong people applied in droves. Many acted on a whim, while others hoped to fulfill an emigration dream, so they swarmed aboard.

At first Ottawa preached morality, but before long that talk quietly faded and the abacus of practical gain came out. The focus shifted to luring Hong Kong people who were young, educated and rich in human capital. Plainly, the goal became immigrants who would "contribute to the economy."

Yet after large numbers of Hong Kong people had been approved to board, Canada's political climate shifted. Confronted by surging anti-immigration sentiment, the government tightened its policy and placed the "lifeboat" Hong Kong people into the "humanitarian and compassionate" category. There they must queue alongside migrants who matter more to Ottawa politically, people from Ukraine, Sudan, Gaza and elsewhere, all competing with Hong Kong people for permanent residency places.

Under Carney's curbs, Hong Kong people queue behind Ukraine migrants.

Under Carney's curbs, Hong Kong people queue behind Ukraine migrants.

Too many mouths, too little to go around.

Then Trudeau fell and Carney took over. PR places in this category were halved to 6,900, and over the next two years there will be only 5,000. Hong Kong people are left waiting wistfully for permanent residency, with no end in sight.

The latest immigration department figures show that by the end of June, a cumulative 30,315 applications from Hong Kong people had been received, covering 48,560 people. So far only 8,600 applications have been approved, with 13,370 people granted permanent residency. In other words, 35,000 people remain unsettled, dangling in mid-air.

The long-waiting Hong Kong people are fuming, but the Canadian government is as slippery as an eel, still processing applications at a snail's pace. It is clearly stalling on purpose to keep the PR tally down. At the current approval rate, and with others continuing to jump the queue, they face at least a 10-year wait to become permanent residents.

Every Word a Tear

The yellow (pro-democracy) media interviewed several of these stranded Hong Kong people, and every word was a tear. Mr. G arrived in Canada in September 2023. After clocking up a full year of work experience, he applied for permanent residency via Stream B in October 2024. By August this year, still not a peep.

He worries his work permit renewal will be refused, leaving him a jobless drifter. Going back to school would mean international student fees he simply cannot afford. Turning it all over in his mind, he lies awake night after night.

Another applicant, Ms. A, likewise submitted her PR application in May 2024, and it too has sunk like a stone into the sea. With her work permit about to expire, employers have reservations about hiring her, which hampers her job search. No wonder she is on tenterhooks.

They complained until they're blue in the face. Some describe themselves as trapped in "paperwork hell," able to move neither forward nor back. Yet the Canadian government keeps singing its slow tune, with no sign of speeding up approvals.

Money Buys the Fast Lane

In truth, Ottawa has not slashed immigration across the board; it all depends on the category. If you are a golden goose, arriving with bags of silver, that is another matter entirely.

The "humanitarian and compassionate" category to which Hong Kong people belong has a quota of just 6,900. The "economic class," by contrast, boasts 239,800 places. Clearly, money buys you the fast lane.

The end of Canada's "lifeboat" scheme symbolizes the end of the operation to "support Hong Kong's revolution." So it is with Canada, and so with Britain. Both have returned to hard interests, talking "gold" rather than "heart."

Hong Kong people still "riding the boat," with neither shore within reach, should see this plainly and harbor no more illusions. At the risk of sounding old-fashioned: life does not offer many more ten-year stretches. Better simply to head home.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles