Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Prime Minister warning of “Regret” over the Far-right’s Anti-Immigration Demonstrations in the UK

Blog

Prime Minister warning of “Regret” over the Far-right’s Anti-Immigration Demonstrations in the UK
Blog

Blog

Prime Minister warning of “Regret” over the Far-right’s Anti-Immigration Demonstrations in the UK

2024-08-07 21:25 Last Updated At:21:28

The government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing its first major crisis as distrust in the state spreads rapidly. In response to the violent riots occurring in many parts of the UK, the British Mail on Sunday bluntly stated that the country is experiencing a "summer of discontent."

On the weekend of August 3-4, the biggest riots in 13 years erupted in several British cities, resulting in injuries to police and property damage. Protests of varying scales took place in Edinburgh, Liverpool, Bristol, Manchester, Stoke, Belfast, and others. In some areas, bricks were thrown, shops were looted, and even the police were attacked.

These riots are the worst in the UK since the summer of 2011, when the killing of a mixed-race man by police in North London sparked widespread unrest.

It’s noted that the incident occurred less than a month after the formation of the new British Cabinet. The Labour party, led by the new prime minister, had hoped that their landslide victory in the general election would usher in a political honeymoon lasting through the summer. However, the euphoria surrounding the new government's arrival dissipated in less than a month due to a series of immediate challenges.

Analysts also pointed out that in addition to the ongoing riots and potential tax increases, the new UK government faces a multitude of problems. Without clear progress on the economy, the National Health Service, and immigration issues, societal discontent in the UK will be hard to overcome.

The wave of protests in the UK emerged following a stabbing rampage on July 29 when a 17-year-old man armed with a knife broke into a children's dance class in Southport, northwest England, killing three children aged 6 to 9 and injuring at least eight others. The incident shocked the society of England.

According to Reuters, hundreds of anti-immigration protesters became embroiled in riots after false information quickly spread on social media claiming that the knife-wielding attacker was a radical Muslim immigrant. Although British police stated that the 17-year-old suspect, Axel Rudakubana, was born in the UK, protests by anti-immigrant demonstrators continued, escalating into violence, arson, and looting.

In Southport, hundreds of people took to the streets to protest, clashing with police who came to maintain order. Protesters threw Molotov cocktails and bricks at the police, inflicting injuries on 39 officers.

In London, violent riots occurred near 10 Downing Street, the British prime minister's official residence. On the evening of July 31, thousands of protesters held a demonstration near Downing Street, chanting slogans like "We want to take our country back" and "Ban migrant boats." Some protesters knocked down police barricades, and threw Molotov cocktails and fireworks at the Prime Minister’s residence and the Winston Churchill statue, leading to fierce clashes with the police. More than 100 protesters were arrested.

During the Sunderland protests, a police building was looted and adjacent buildings were set on fire.

In Belfast, protesters smashed the windows of a café outside a mosque and threw bricks at reporters.

In Liverpool, about 1,000 anti-immigration protesters clashed with counter-protesters, with some shouting hate speech.

Facing this series of emergencies, the new British government has shown a tough stance. Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the violence, stating that protesters were exploiting social grief to create unrest. He emphasized that the government would fully support the police in their fight against extremists who seek to spread hate.

"I guarantee you that you will regret taking part in this disorder. Whether directly or those whipping up these actions online,and then running away themselves," Starmer said in a televised address.

The British Prime Minister stressed that there was "no justification" for what he called "far-right thuggery" and vowed that those responsible would be brought to justice.

The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, stated that anyone involved in criminal disorder and violence would pay a price and that communities must feel safe. The Sunday Express quoted Cooper as saying that she was preparing to call in the army if rioting continues, because of  concerns that the police forces could become overwhelmed and exhausted.

At the same time, British police promised to arrest and prosecute criminals swiftly, assuring that the UK has enough prison space to house offenders.

The Daily Telegraph stated on the 4th that no matter the excuses, violent riots are unacceptable. Amid the nationwide turmoil, however, Starmer needs to consider deeper issues. Rising numbers of migrants, failure to control immigration, inconsistent enforcement measures, and different opinions over "diversity and inclusion" are making more and more Britons uneasy. Illegal acts of violence must be resolutely stopped and dealt with, but fundamental issues also need to be resolved.

According to Al Jazeera, one of the issues overlooked in the previous British parliamentary elections was the rise of the far right. The far-right, represented by Nigel Farage, the leader of the Reform Party, has been relentlessly inciting claims that Britain is being stolen by foreign immigrants. Farage recently posted on social media X that in the major cities of London, Manchester, and Birmingham, the "white" population no longer constitutes the majority. This claim, however, is entirely false.

Pakistan's "The Nation" reported on the 4th that Britain, which prides itself as a model of Western civilized values, is now in such chaos, with scenes reminiscent of fragile developing countries. Recently, anti-immigrant and anti-Islam sentiments have surfaced in the UK, with parts of the country descending into violent battlefields, terrorizing the Muslim community. The UK has had a disastrous "Brexit" and now faces a cost-of-living crisis. If far-right xenophobia is allowed to take root, British society risks fracturing and falling into bitter infighting.




Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump's Venezuela play just gave Western progressives a masterclass in American hypocrisy.

Steve Bannon, Trump's longtime strategist, told The New York Times the Venezuela assault—arresting President Nicolás Maduro and all—stands as this administration's most consequential foreign policy move. Meticulously planned, Bannon concedes, but woefully short on ideological groundwork. "The lack of framing of the message on a potential occupation has the base bewildered, if not angry".

Trump's rationale for nabbing Maduro across international borders was drug trafficking. But here's the tell: once Maduro was in custody, Trump stopped talking about Venezuelan cocaine and started obsessing over Venezuelan oil. He's demanding US oil companies march back into Venezuela to seize control of local assets. And that's not all—he wants Venezuela to cough up 50 million barrels of oil.

Trump's Colonial Playbook

On January 6, Trump unveiled his blueprint: Venezuela releases 50 million barrels to the United States. America sells it. Market watchers peg the haul at roughly $2.8 billion.

Trump then gleefully mapped out how the proceeds would flow—only to "American-made products." He posted on social media: "These purchases will include, among other things, American Agricultural Products, and American Made Medicines, Medical Devices, and Equipment to improve Venezuela's Electric Grid and Energy Facilities. In other words, Venezuela is committing to doing business with the United States of America as their principal partner."

Trump's demand for 50 million barrels up front—not a massive volume, granted—betrays a blunt short-term goal. It's the classic imperial playbook: invade a colony, plunder its resources, sail home and parade the spoils before your supporters to justify the whole bloody enterprise. Trump isn't chasing the ideological legitimacy Bannon mentioned. He's after something more primal: material legitimacy. Show me a colonial power that didn't loot minerals or enslave labor from its colonies.

America's Western allies were silent as the grave when faced with such dictatorial swagger. But pivot the camera to Hong Kong, and suddenly they're all righteous indignation.

The British Double Standard

Recently, former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith penned an op-ed in The Times, slamming the British government for doing "nothing but issuing 'strongly worded' statements in the face of Beijing's trampling of the Sino-British Joint Declaration." He's calling on the Labour government to sanction the three designated National Security Law judges who convicted Apple Daily founder Jimmy Lai of "collusion with foreign forces"—to prove that "Hong Kong's judiciary has become a farce." Duncan Smith even vowed to raise the matter for debate in the British Parliament.

The Conservatives sound principled enough. But think it through, and it's laughable. The whole world's talking about Maduro right now—nobody's talking about Jimmy Lai anymore.

Maduro appeared in US Federal Court in New York on January 6. The United States has trampled international law and the UN Charter—that's what Duncan Smith would call "American justice becoming a farce." If Duncan Smith's so formidable, why doesn't he demand the British government sanction Trump? Why not sanction the New York Federal Court judges? If he wants to launch a parliamentary debate, why not urgently debate America's crimes in invading Venezuela? Duncan Smith's double standards are chilling.

Silence on Venezuela

After the Venezuela incident, I searched extensively online—even deployed AI—but couldn't find a single comment from former Conservative leader Duncan Smith on America's invasion of Venezuela. Duncan Smith has retreated into his shell.

Duncan Smith is fiercely pro-US. When Trump visited the UK last September amid considerable domestic criticism, the opposition Conservatives didn't just stay quiet—Duncan Smith actively defended him, calling Trump's unprecedented second UK visit critically important: "if the countries that believe in freedom, democracy and the rule of law don’t unite, the totalitarian states… will dominate the world and it will be a terrible world to live in."

The irony cuts deep now. America forcibly seizes another country's oil and minerals—Trump is fundamentally an imperialist dictator. With Duncan Smith's enthusiastic backing, this totalitarian Trump has truly won.

Incidentally, the Conservative Party has completely destroyed itself. The party commanding the highest support in Britain today is the far-right Reform Party. As early as last May, YouGov polling showed Reform Party capturing the highest support at 29%, the governing Labour Party languishing at just 22%, the Liberal Democrats ranking third at 17%, and the Conservatives degraded to fourth place with 16% support.

The gutless Conservative Party members fear offending Trump, while voters flock to the Reform Party instead. The Conservatives' posturing shows they've become petty villains for nothing.

Lo Wing-hung

Recommended Articles