Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Trump's Venezuelan Oil Grab: Big Oil Not Playing Along?

Blog

Trump's Venezuelan Oil Grab: Big Oil Not Playing Along?
Blog

Blog

Trump's Venezuelan Oil Grab: Big Oil Not Playing Along?

2026-01-06 18:08 Last Updated At:18:08

Trump wasted not one second after US forces grabbed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. He made it clear that he was eyeing the country's oil riches. But here's the catch: America's biggest oil companies aren't biting. Industry analysts confirm what the companies won't say publicly—even if these firms wanted back in, Venezuela's crumbling infrastructure and chaos on the ground mean Trump's fantasy of quick oil profits is far from easy to come true.

Trump promises Big Oil will pour billions into Venezuela. The oil giants say they never got the memo. AP Photo

Trump promises Big Oil will pour billions into Venezuela. The oil giants say they never got the memo. AP Photo

Minutes after the military operation wrapped, Trump stood at a press conference making promises. Major American oil companies would pour into Venezuela, he declared, investing billions to fix the country's shattered oil infrastructure "and start making money for the country". Meanwhile, he reiterated that the US embargo on all Venezuelan oil remains in full effect.

Those sanctions have crushed Venezuelan exports into paralysis. Documents from Venezuela's state oil company and sources close to the situation confirm storage tanks and floating facilities filled up fast over recent weeks. Multiple oil fields now face forced production cuts.

White House Courts Reluctant Executives

Reuters revealed the Trump administration plans meetings this week with executives from major US oil companies. The agenda: pushing these firms to restore and grow oil production in Venezuela following the military action. The White House sees this as a critical step toward getting American oil giants back into the country to tap the world's largest proven oil reserves.

But Trump's eagerness hasn't translated into corporate enthusiasm. Several major US oil companies are taking a wait-and-see approach, watching Venezuela closely. ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and Chevron all denied any prior communication with the White House about Venezuela. This directly contradicts Trump's claim over the weekend that he had already met with "all" US oil firms both before and after Maduro's capture.

Venezuela sits on roughly 17% of the world's proven oil reserves—first place globally. Yet US sanctions and other pressures have gutted its production capacity. Current output runs around 1 million barrels daily, barely 0.8% of global crude production.

World's largest oil reserves, strangled by US sanctions. Trump's quick-profit scheme hits a hard reality. AP Photo

World's largest oil reserves, strangled by US sanctions. Trump's quick-profit scheme hits a hard reality. AP Photo

Only One Company Stays Put

Chevron remains the sole major US oil company still operating Venezuelan fields. The firm has worked in Venezuela for over a century, producing heavy crude that feeds refineries along the Gulf Coast and beyond. A company spokesperson said on the 3rd that the current priority centers on "ensuring employee safety, well-being, and asset integrity," adding they "will continue to operate in accordance with laws and regulations."

ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips previously invested in Venezuela. In the 1970s, the Venezuelan government nationalized the oil industry, reopened to foreign investment by century's end, then demanded in 2007 that Western companies developing oil fields form joint ventures with Venezuelan firms under Venezuelan control. ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips pulled out. Neither company has responded to Trump's latest remarks about US capital entering Venezuela.

One oil industry executive told Reuters that companies fear discussing potential Venezuelan business at White House-organized meetings due to antitrust concerns.

Benefits Flow to First Mover

Francisco Monaldi, director of the Latin America Energy Program at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, expects Chevron would likely benefit first if Venezuela opens oil projects to the US. Other oil companies, he notes, will watch Venezuela's political situation closely and observe the operating environment and contract compliance before making moves.

Mark Christian, business director at an Oklahoma energy consulting firm, lays out the baseline: US companies will only return to Venezuela if they're certain of investment returns and receive at least minimal security guarantees. Lifting sanctions on Venezuela stands as a prerequisite for US companies re-entering that market.

Reality Check on Oil Profits

Even with sanctions lifted, the Trump administration won't find making money from invasion-acquired oil that easy.

 Industry insiders admit large-scale restoration of Venezuelan oil production demands years of time and billions in investment, while confronting major obstacles: dilapidated infrastructure, uncertain political prospects, legal risks, and long-term US policy uncertainty.

Peter McNally, global head of industry analysis at Third Bridge, said, "There are still many questions that need to be answered about the state of the Venezuelan oil industry, but it is clear that it will take tens of billions of dollars to turn that industry around." He then added that it could take at least a decade of Western oil majors committing to the country.

Ed Hirs, an energy expert at the University of Houston, pointed to a pattern: US military invasions of other countries in recent years haven't delivered substantial returns to American companies. The history of Iraq and Libya may repeat itself in Venezuela.




Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump's attacks on Iran have now stretched into a month, yet tensions show no sign of easing. International fuel supplies face severe disruption as the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, sending oil prices soaring. 

Trump has deployed every rhetorical tool at his disposal—even renaming the waterway the 'Trump Strait'. He’s pursued both carrots and sticks to force a quick deal with Iran on reopening. Iran, however, stands firm, signaling deep disagreement between the two sides over ceasefire terms.

Strait of Hormuz

Strait of Hormuz

On March 27, Trump spoke at a summit and called the Strait of Hormuz the ' Strait of Trump,' insisting ' they have to open it up, the Strait of Trump — I mean, Hormuz.' He half-joked about the slip, mocking the fake news would claim he'd misspoken, and quipped that such 'accidents' rarely happen to him.

Trump speaks at a summit, calling the Strait of Hormuz the 'Trump Strait'

Trump speaks at a summit, calling the Strait of Hormuz the 'Trump Strait'

'Strait of Trump': US president says Iran must open key waterway

Trump claimed Iran had previously denied participating in talks but is now allowing tankers through the Strait of Hormuz to 'apologized for something they said.' He revealed Iran is actively negotiating and desperate for a deal, noting 'and two days later, they admitted it.' According to Trump, Iran initially proposed allowing 8 tankers, then added 2 more.

As the US-Iran conflict drags on, the Strait of Hormuz has been effectively shut for nearly four weeks, driving international oil and gasoline prices sharply higher. On March 26, average US gasoline prices hit roughly $3.98 per gallon—about $1 more than a month before the conflict erupted. Trump had threatened Iran with 'complete destruction' of its power plants unless it fully reopened the Strait within days, but later extended the deadline by 10 days 'as negotiations with Iran continue,' pushing the new deadline to April 6.

With the US-Iran conflict ongoing, the Strait of Hormuz has been effectively closed for nearly four weeks, driving international oil and gasoline prices sharply higher.

With the US-Iran conflict ongoing, the Strait of Hormuz has been effectively closed for nearly four weeks, driving international oil and gasoline prices sharply higher.

To downplay the impact of rising oil prices, Trump has recently been touting "productive" conversations with Iranian leaders, but this was denied by the Iranian side, stating they are reviewing the ceasefire proposal presented by the US but have not engaged in any negotiations with the United States.

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi said on the 25th that the Strait of Hormuz isn't completely closed and countries not involved in military action against Iran can transit with Iranian coordination. But that same day, Trump threatened to open the "Trump Strait." Iran's Mehr News Agency reported that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a statement saying the Strait of Hormuz remains "closed" to vessels and has turned away three container ships.

The statement detailed what happened after Trump falsely claimed the strait was open. Three container ships of different nationalities tried to enter the "Tehran toll booth " that morning. After receiving warnings from the Revolutionary Guard Navy, they were forced to turn back. The Revolutionary Guard emphasized the Strait of Hormuz is currently closed. Any vessels heading to or coming from ports of the United States, Israel, and their supporters are prohibited from passage. Attempts to transit without authorization face "severe measures."

The Revolutionary Guard emphasizes that the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, with all vessels bound for or departing from US, Israeli, and allied ports barred from passage.

The Revolutionary Guard emphasizes that the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, with all vessels bound for or departing from US, Israeli, and allied ports barred from passage.

According to Reuters, on March 26 Trump claimed in a cabinet meeting that he received a "gift" from Iran. He said that Iran, to demonstrate sincerity in negotiations, had allowed 10 oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Trump used this to validate his earlier claim that Iran is participating in negotiations and to suggest his judgment was correct.

Trump linked the release of tankers to Iran's acknowledgment of negotiations. Analysts see a clear pattern: Trump is trying to stabilize oil price volatility from the past month. He's extending deadlines to hold the line while downplaying market reactions by repeatedly calling dialogue with Iran "productive." Iran, meanwhile, has adopted a "you're anxious, I'm not" posture. It continues denying direct negotiations with the United States and reaffirms through Revolutionary Guard statements that the strait remains closed. It's using the Strait of Hormuz as leverage without signaling any willingness to open it.

On the same day, the United States and Iran released starkly conflicting accounts of strait conditions and negotiation progress. One side signaled that tanker releases and talks were moving forward in tandem; the other took concrete action to block vessel passage and reaffirmed its blockade stance. As global oil prices swung on the back of strait tensions, the divergent messaging made it harder for observers to gauge actual transit conditions and the direction of US-Iran relations.

Recommended Articles