"Hong Kong Watch" Leader Benedict Rogers Resigns Amid Scandal of Discrimination Against Asian Colleagues

Benedict Rogers, the founder of the British anti-China organization "Hong Kong Watch," who often advocates for human rights and freedom, has recently been implicated in a scandal involving allegations of discriminatory remarks against Asian colleagues and mistreatment of his employees, as reported by foreign media.

Benedict Rogers

The British online media outlet Crises/Z first broke the story, revealing that Rogers had made derogatory remarks about Asian employees in communications through email, WhatsApp, and other messaging tools. In one particular instance, Rogers reportedly criticized what he termed the "Malaysian mindset," stating that it required "a lot of review and discussion."

The British online media outlet Crises/Z first broke the story, revealing that Benedict Rogers had made derogatory remarks about Asian employees.

The report highlighted a specific exchange between Rogers and a Malaysian colleague named Steven. Rogers wrote:

"Hi Steve. I have not received any feedback from you in response to my Seoul Mission Report, which I worked on as a matter of urgency late last night following your urgent request for it (which I had not known in advance would be required). I was very happy to do so, but given that I responded so quickly to your urgent request, I am surprised I have not received any response other than ‘Thanks for the attachment.’ It wasn’t simply an attachment; it was a report with valuable recommendations."

Steven responded: "Perhaps you are not aware that I have other things to do today, Ben. Are you suggesting that because you took it upon yourself to ‘work on it urgently,’ I should also look at it with urgency and get back to you? Come on."

Rogers continued to press the issue, stating: "I do not understand why you are being so defensive, aggressive, and insensitive. Your ungraciousness is extraordinary. Are you okay? I merely wanted to make sure that you had received the report, which you had requested suddenly, unexpectedly, and I thought urgently. I think you’re reading far, far too much into our communications."

This exchange underscored Rogers' dissatisfaction with the response he received regarding the report he had urgently prepared. His insistence on immediate feedback and his late-night demands were seen as inappropriate and unprofessional.

Rogers, who also serves as the head of the East Asia division of Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW), referred in his communication to the "Seoul mission," which involved his trip to Seoul on behalf of the organization. He expressed frustration that his efforts over several days had not been sufficiently acknowledged.

In another comment to his Malaysian colleague, Rogers stated: "All I ask is a simple, decent acknowledgment of this and an acknowledgment of the report I sent when urgently requested. Your inability to say a simple thank you for taking 4 days leave to work for 4 days in Seoul for CSW, to donate one full day pro bono voluntarily. The next time you come to London, we really should have a drink, to catch up. The Malaysian mindset needs a lot of review and discussion."

The UK online media outlet Crises/Z pointed out that Rogers' remarks, particularly the controversial reference to the "Malaysian mindset," were widely perceived as offensive and inappropriate.

Under significant pressure following these media revelations, Rogers resigned from his position as Chief Executive of Hong Kong Watch.

On August 2, in a live broadcast on YouTube, Rogers announced that it was his "last day" as Executive Director of Hong Kong Watch, though he mentioned that he would continue to work with the organization as a trustee. He stated: "After four years of full-time leadership of Hong Kong Watch, it is time for me to take on a new challenge." It is widely speculated that his resignation was influenced by the controversy surrounding his conduct.

Critics have noted that while Rogers frequently speaks about human rights and freedom, he shows disrespect and discrimination against fellow colleagues. He should withdraw himself entirely from Hong Kong Watch, and should not stay as its trustee.

Rogers founded "Hong Kong Watch" in close collaboration with Jimmy Lai, leading to suspicions that Lai's perspectives were being "exported and ploughed back" to Hong Kong. During the trial of Jimmy Lai, it was revealed that Lai's mobile phone contained numerous clips of Rogers, including interviews in which Rogers participated in anti-Hong Kong protests in the UK. In these interviews, Rogers urged the British government to take action regarding the Hong Kong legislative amendment controversy, put pressure on the Hong Kong SAR government, and called on the British government to take efforts to "sanction" China. Rogers reportedly sent these clips to Lai as though he were submitting assignments.

Chan Pui-man, former associate publisher of Apple Daily, testified in court that Lai had instructed her to assist Rogers in establishing "Hong Kong Watch." On October 31, 2017, Lai sent a WhatsApp message to Chan, informing her that he had just had dinner with Rogers, who had founded "Hong Kong Watch" with some British MPs. Lai provided Chan's contact details to Rogers for future communication and support. Following their contact, Chan regularly received press releases from "Hong Kong Watch" for publication in Apple Daily. Initially, these releases introduced the organization and commented on the state of freedom and human rights in Hong Kong. However, during the 2019 amendment controversy, "Hong Kong Watch" began issuing frequent statements on Hong Kong affairs, with Apple Daily consistently publishing these under Lai’s direction.

This scandal has cast a spotlight on "Hong Kong Watch," revealing the double standards of its leader, Rogers, who appears to hold others to higher standards than those he applies to himself.
 

Ariel

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Now in its third week, the US-Israel-Iran conflict has pushed Trump to demand that China, NATO members, Japan, and South Korea dispatch warships to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz and drive down oil prices. With the US-China summit scheduled for month's end drawing closer and allies offering lukewarm support, Trump suddenly escalated by issuing what looked like an ultimatum to Beijing: postpone his meeting with Xi Jinping unless China helps protect the Strait of Hormuz. In an interview with the Financial Times, he underscored that China depends heavily on Middle Eastern oil, and should therefore join the effort.


The remarks sparked global outcry. Many read Trump's words as a veiled threat: if China refuses to send warships to the Strait of Hormuz, he will delay his China visit.


US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, attending new US-China economic and trade consultations in Paris, moved quickly to walk back Trump's remarks. He said the timing of Trump's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping remains uncertain and suggested that any postponement would stem from logistics tied to the Iran conflict—Trump has decided to stay in Washington to oversee military operations. Bessent was explicit: any delay would have nothing to do with the Strait of Hormuz or trade disputes.


Bessent quickly moved to "clarify" Trump's remarks, insisting that any summit delay would have nothing to do with Strait of Hormuz security or trade disputes.

Beijing's Diplomatic Response

Beijing's response was measured. Lin Jian, spokesman of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said leader-level diplomacy plays an irreplaceable role in steering US-China relations, and that both sides have kept communication open on Trump's planned visit to China.

On the Strait of Hormuz, Lin Jian said the recent escalation of tensions has disrupted international cargo and energy trade routes and destabilized regional and global peace, and China calls on all parties to immediately halt military operations. On the trade front, the two sides, guided by the consensus reached between the two leaders, held candid, in-depth, and constructive consultations on tariff arrangements, bilateral trade and investment, and the upholding of existing agreements, finding new common ground and agreeing to continue talks.


Trump Confirms Summit Postponement

Trump said Monday he had requested to postpone his planned China visit by roughly one month due to the Iran war, and that he was in talks with Beijing about the timing. He stressed his eagerness to visit China, but said the conflict required him to stay in Washington to manage the situation—a necessity, in his view—and therefore he had asked to delay the US-China summit.


Trump later added that he wants very much to visit China but must stay in Washington to manage the Iran conflict.

Trump expressed disappointment when allies refused or gave lukewarm responses to his call for escort missions. The New York Times quoted him saying he'd always suspected that if America ever needed help, these countries wouldn't stand by its side—and now they were proving him right.


But he quickly shifted tone, pivoting to bravado. 'We don't need anybody,' he declared. 'We are the strongest nation in the world.' The message was clear: Trump was treating the Strait of Hormuz escort mission as a loyalty test for America's allies.