Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: China Catches Up in AI – US Risks Losing Chip Market

Blog

Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: China Catches Up in AI – US Risks Losing Chip Market
Blog

Blog

Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: China Catches Up in AI – US Risks Losing Chip Market

2025-05-03 10:25 Last Updated At:10:25

The US–China trade war continues, with Nvidia, the American chip giant, bearing the brunt of escalating tensions. According to Reuters, on May 1, Nvidia’s top executives met behind closed doors with the US House Foreign Affairs Committee. During the meeting, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang voiced concerns about the rapid advancement of Chinese companies’ artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities, particularly the potential for firms like DeepSeek and future open-source Chinese models to run on domestically produced chips. Huang had previously warned that China is not behind the US in AI and is, in fact, “very, very close”, highlighting Huawei’s exceptional progress in computing and networking technologies. He called on the Trump administration to revise current restrictions on AI technology exports.

Huang warned that China is not lagging behind the US in AI, and is “very close.”

Huang warned that China is not lagging behind the US in AI, and is “very close.”

The meeting reportedly focused on Chinese AI chips and the possibility that restricting Nvidia’s exports could make Chinese chips more competitive. A congressional source noted that if models like DeepSeek R1 are trained on Chinese chips, or if future Chinese open-source models become highly compatible with domestic chips, this could create global demand for Chinese semiconductors.

A Nvidia spokesperson stated that Huang’s meeting with the committee centered on the strategic importance of AI as national infrastructure and the need to invest in US manufacturing. Nvidia reiterated its full support for government efforts to promote American technology and interests worldwide.

Bloomberg, citing insiders, reported that the US is considering easing restrictions on Nvidia chip exports to the UAE. Trump has questioned why chips can’t be sold to a country already cleared to buy American F-35 fighter jets, and may announce starting negotiations on the subject during his Middle East trip from May 13 to 16.

Nvidia chips have long been a target of US export controls, as they are essential for developing chatbots, image generators, and other AI systems. Since the Biden administration’s 2022 crackdown, restrictions have steadily tightened, banning Nvidia from selling its most advanced products to Chinese customers. In April, the Trump administration halted sales of Nvidia’s “China-specific” H20 chips, a move Nvidia said would cost it $5.5 billion. Washington has since signaled further restrictions, even as demand from China for such chips grows due to low-cost AI models like DeepSeek.

Bloomberg reported that Huang is urging the Trump administration to revise AI export rules. (X)

Bloomberg reported that Huang is urging the Trump administration to revise AI export rules. (X)

On April 30, Huang attended the Hill & Valley Forum in Washington, D.C., where he urged the Trump administration to change chip export rules, arguing that “the world has fundamentally changed.” He stressed, “China is not behind – China is right behind us. We’re very, very, very close.”

Huang emphasized that China is quickly becoming a formidable competitor in technology, singling out Huawei for its advances in AI chip design. “Huawei excels in computing and networking – both are essential for advancing AI,” he said. “Just as we make physical cars today, or anything physical in the future, there’ll be a digital version of it. So you need an AI factory to create the AI model that runs in the car.”

He described the AI race as a long-term, infinite race, urging the US government to support domestic companies to compete globally. “This is an industry that we will have to compete for,” Huang declared.

Nvidia has criticized the Biden administration’s so-called “Interim Final Rule on Artificial Intelligence Diffusion” as “highly misleading,” warning that US policy should focus on boosting domestic competitiveness. Restricting chip sales to China and other countries, Nvidia argues, only threatens America’s technological lead.

The Wall Street Journal reported on April 29 that US export controls have failed to curb China’s AI ambitions, instead hampering Nvidia and other American firms while creating opportunities for competitors in China, South Korea, Japan, and Europe.

The report described “AI factories” as one-stop shops selling AI chips, software, design, and network infrastructure. Huang believes these AI factories will become standard for US companies, and that AI-powered data centers under construction will create new jobs in fields like construction and IT.

When Trump met Huang at the White House, he praised Nvidia’s $500 billion AI investment plan.(AP Photo)

When Trump met Huang at the White House, he praised Nvidia’s $500 billion AI investment plan.(AP Photo)

On the same day, Huang attended a White House event where Trump, referring to him as “my friend,” praised Nvidia’s $500 billion investment in US AI infrastructure. Huang, in turn, lauded Trump’s efforts to revive American manufacturing, saying it would help Nvidia develop next-generation technologies. “I’m delighted that the administration is really encouraging and supporting the industry with on-shore manufacturing,” Huang said. “If we don’t get good at manufacturing, we’re going to leave behind a giant industry”, he added.

Recently, Huang completed his second trip to China this year. On April 28, Zhao Ping, spokesperson for the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, said China is committed to serving as a bridge for communication with the US and global business, voicing opposition to tariffs and unilateralism. Zhao called on the US to stop using tariffs as a weapon and to resolve issues through equal-base dialogue, aiming for stable, healthy, and sustainable bilateral economic relations.

Zhao also stressed that decoupling, tariff barriers, and politicizing economic issues are unpopular with the global business community. She highlighted China’s policy transparency, market potential, and comprehensive industrial system. Just like Huang’s remark during his visit: “The China market is very important to us, and it's important to our growth.”




Deep Throat

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Trump's Venezuela play just gave Western progressives a masterclass in American hypocrisy.

Steve Bannon, Trump's longtime strategist, told The New York Times the Venezuela assault—arresting President Nicolás Maduro and all—stands as this administration's most consequential foreign policy move. Meticulously planned, Bannon concedes, but woefully short on ideological groundwork. "The lack of framing of the message on a potential occupation has the base bewildered, if not angry".

Trump's rationale for nabbing Maduro across international borders was drug trafficking. But here's the tell: once Maduro was in custody, Trump stopped talking about Venezuelan cocaine and started obsessing over Venezuelan oil. He's demanding US oil companies march back into Venezuela to seize control of local assets. And that's not all—he wants Venezuela to cough up 50 million barrels of oil.

Trump's Colonial Playbook

On January 6, Trump unveiled his blueprint: Venezuela releases 50 million barrels to the United States. America sells it. Market watchers peg the haul at roughly $2.8 billion.

Trump then gleefully mapped out how the proceeds would flow—only to "American-made products." He posted on social media: "These purchases will include, among other things, American Agricultural Products, and American Made Medicines, Medical Devices, and Equipment to improve Venezuela's Electric Grid and Energy Facilities. In other words, Venezuela is committing to doing business with the United States of America as their principal partner."

Trump's demand for 50 million barrels up front—not a massive volume, granted—betrays a blunt short-term goal. It's the classic imperial playbook: invade a colony, plunder its resources, sail home and parade the spoils before your supporters to justify the whole bloody enterprise. Trump isn't chasing the ideological legitimacy Bannon mentioned. He's after something more primal: material legitimacy. Show me a colonial power that didn't loot minerals or enslave labor from its colonies.

America's Western allies were silent as the grave when faced with such dictatorial swagger. But pivot the camera to Hong Kong, and suddenly they're all righteous indignation.

The British Double Standard

Recently, former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith penned an op-ed in The Times, slamming the British government for doing "nothing but issuing 'strongly worded' statements in the face of Beijing's trampling of the Sino-British Joint Declaration." He's calling on the Labour government to sanction the three designated National Security Law judges who convicted Apple Daily founder Jimmy Lai of "collusion with foreign forces"—to prove that "Hong Kong's judiciary has become a farce." Duncan Smith even vowed to raise the matter for debate in the British Parliament.

The Conservatives sound principled enough. But think it through, and it's laughable. The whole world's talking about Maduro right now—nobody's talking about Jimmy Lai anymore.

Maduro appeared in US Federal Court in New York on January 6. The United States has trampled international law and the UN Charter—that's what Duncan Smith would call "American justice becoming a farce." If Duncan Smith's so formidable, why doesn't he demand the British government sanction Trump? Why not sanction the New York Federal Court judges? If he wants to launch a parliamentary debate, why not urgently debate America's crimes in invading Venezuela? Duncan Smith's double standards are chilling.

Silence on Venezuela

After the Venezuela incident, I searched extensively online—even deployed AI—but couldn't find a single comment from former Conservative leader Duncan Smith on America's invasion of Venezuela. Duncan Smith has retreated into his shell.

Duncan Smith is fiercely pro-US. When Trump visited the UK last September amid considerable domestic criticism, the opposition Conservatives didn't just stay quiet—Duncan Smith actively defended him, calling Trump's unprecedented second UK visit critically important: "if the countries that believe in freedom, democracy and the rule of law don’t unite, the totalitarian states… will dominate the world and it will be a terrible world to live in."

The irony cuts deep now. America forcibly seizes another country's oil and minerals—Trump is fundamentally an imperialist dictator. With Duncan Smith's enthusiastic backing, this totalitarian Trump has truly won.

Incidentally, the Conservative Party has completely destroyed itself. The party commanding the highest support in Britain today is the far-right Reform Party. As early as last May, YouGov polling showed Reform Party capturing the highest support at 29%, the governing Labour Party languishing at just 22%, the Liberal Democrats ranking third at 17%, and the Conservatives degraded to fourth place with 16% support.

The gutless Conservative Party members fear offending Trump, while voters flock to the Reform Party instead. The Conservatives' posturing shows they've become petty villains for nothing.

Lo Wing-hung

Recommended Articles