Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

U.S. shift on Potsdam Declaration raises questions: expert

China

China

China

U.S. shift on Potsdam Declaration raises questions: expert

2025-07-27 17:22 Last Updated At:07-28 03:37

The U.S. shift from stringent enforcement to lenient compromises raises questions about whether the original intent of the Potsdam Declaration has been forgotten.

The Potsdam Declaration was issued by the United States, Great Britain, and China on July 26, 1945, calling for the unconditional surrender of Japan. It was announced at the Potsdam Conference near the end of World War II.

The Chinese handwritten copy of the document is now housed in China’s Second Historical Archives, while the English version is purportedly archived in the U.S. National Archives.

However, 80 years later, the Maryland branch of the U.S. National Archives stated that its records related to the Potsdam Declaration include only the surrender document signed by the Japanese government on September 2, 1945, with no trace of the original declaration.

According to the online collection of the Foreign Relations of the United States, the textual content of the Potsdam Declaration outlined Japan's war responsibilities and post-war obligations, such as returning occupied territories, and specifically stated that the U.S., China, and the U.K. jointly demanded Japan's unconditional surrender.

Alexis Dudden, a history professor at the University of Connecticut, pointed out that China's crucial role in the Potsdam Declaration is inseparable from its significant contribution to resisting Japanese fascist aggression during World War II.

"Because without China's resistance to counter Japanese aggression for that point -- almost 15 years, September 1931 to summer of 1945 -- the Americans and the British, and to a lesser extent, Dutch and French, fighting against the Japanese in Southeast Asia, in the Pacific would have had a much, much different Japanese military to counter. There's a huge role that China played in weakening the Japanese military," said Dudden.

Although the declaration explicitly required Japan to return all occupied territories and eliminate militaristic influences, and solemnly reaffirmed the enforcement of the Cairo Declaration’s terms, the emergence of the Cold War led the United States to reinterpret the essence of the declaration.

"The Potsdam Declaration had declared the evil people who had misled the Japanese and would be named as war criminals. In early 1949, called the reverse course, will happen. And a banker from Detroit, Joseph Dodge, comes in and shifts Japan's monetary policy, and also its industrial policy. And it's at that juncture that even former named war criminals are released from jail," she said.

In 1951, the United States spearheaded the signing of the "San Francisco Peace Treaty," officially ending the state of war with Japan. However, most Asian victim countries were excluded from the agreement. On the same day, the "US-Japan Security Treaty" was signed.

At this point, the original intent behind the creation of the Potsdam Proclamation -- to help build a just postwar order -- much like the English original purportedly housed in the U.S. National Archives, seems to have vanished.

U.S. shift on Potsdam Declaration raises questions: expert

U.S. shift on Potsdam Declaration raises questions: expert

The oil price shock triggered by the war in the Middle East could reduce euro-area GDP growth by around 0.4 percentage points over the first year following the shock, according to a European Central Bank (ECB) study released on Wednesday.

Since the outbreak of the war in late February, disruptions to oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz and reduced oil supply from the Middle East have pushed crude prices sharply higher, said the study.

It added that the increase in oil prices triggered by the current shock has so far been larger than that observed after the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, although it remains smaller than the rise seen during the Gulf War in the early 1990s.

The ECB said higher oil prices are likely to weigh on the euro-area economy through rising production costs, lower household purchasing power, weaker global demand and heightened uncertainty.

Based on historical evidence, the ECB estimated that a geopolitical oil supply shock that raises real oil prices by 10 percent could reduce euro-area GDP growth by around 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points in each of the three years following the shock.

The study found that the impact on investment is likely to be more pronounced than that on private consumption. According to the ECB, heightened geopolitical uncertainty may prompt firms to delay expansion plans, equipment purchases and hiring decisions, dampening investment activity and amplifying the impact on economic growth.

The ECB noted that the euro area's dependence on oil has declined over time, but the response of investment to geopolitical oil supply shocks appears to have remained broadly stable.

The study cautioned that the overall impact of the current shock remains highly uncertain and will depend on the magnitude and persistence of the oil price increase. A prolonged period of elevated oil prices, broader supply-chain disruptions or spillovers into gas markets could further intensify downward pressure on euro-area growth.

Middle East oil shock could cut euro-area growth by 0.4 percentage points in first year: ECB

Middle East oil shock could cut euro-area growth by 0.4 percentage points in first year: ECB

Recommended Articles