QS World University Rankings: Asia 2026  Hong Kong Soars as HKU Crowned Asia’s Best for First Time in 15 Years

 Global higher education experts QS Quacquarelli Symonds today released the QS World University Rankings: Asia 2026*. 

This year’s results see The University of Hong Kong (HKU) crowned Asia’s best university, overtaking Peking University, which falls to second place. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU) climbs one position to joint third, alongside the National University of Singapore (NUS).

The 2026 edition is the largest ever, featuring 1,529 universities across 25 higher education systems, including 558 debutants.

Mainland China remains the most represented system, adding 261 new institutions to reach 395 in total. India follows, contributing 137 new entrants for a total of 294 ranked universities. Hong Kong SAR, China, and Singapore are the only higher education systems represented among Asia’s top 10.

Two Hong Kong universities newly enter the top tier:

● The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) climbs from 11th to 6th.

● The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) rises from 17th to 10th.

In total, 11 Hong Kong universities appear in this year’s rankings—nine rise and two fall, giving Hong Kong the greatest improvement rate of any higher education system.

Ben Sowter, QS Senior Vice President, said:

“Hong Kong has emerged as an international study destination in its own right. The QS World University Rankings: Asia 2026 mark the first time in over a decade that the University of Hong Kong has been crowned Asia’s best university. Four of Hong Kong’s 11 ranked institutions achieve their best-ever results this year, reflecting exceptional reputations among both academics and global employers. The rankings also highlight areas for further improvement that will enable Hong Kong’s universities to consolidate their leading position within Asia’s higher education landscape.”

Professor Xiang Zhang, President and Vice-Chancellor of The University of Hong Kong, said:

"This recognition as Asia’s leading university is both an honour and a responsibility. At HKU, we view it not as an endpoint, but as affirmation of our commitment to excellence in scholarship, global engagement, and shaping this dynamic region’s future. Asia’s rise as a nexus of knowledge demands universities that are locally grounded yet globally minded. Through partnerships across the region and beyond, HKU fosters intellectual exchange, cultivates talent, and addresses pressing global challenges. Together, we will continue to push boundaries—not for rankings, but for meaningful impact."

Executive Summary

Hong Kong SAR is the most improved higher education system in the 2026 edition, now boasting more top 10 universities than any other location.

Overall, Hong Kong SAR, Malaysia, Macao SAR, Singapore, and Thailand are the only systems showing a net improvement, with more institutions rising than falling. While 19 countries or territories have recorded majority drops, this is largely due to intensified competition driven by the expansion of the rankings.

The QS World University Rankings: Asia assesses universities based on 11 indicators, which have been tailored to reflect the nuances of the region and differentiate it from the QS World University Rankings. The below table shows the top performing university in Asia in each of QS’ indicators. Detailed methodological information can be found here.  

Spotlight: Hong Kong SAR

Hong Kong achieves the highest overall improvement rate (64%), with nine universities rising and two falling. It now claims five of Asia’s top 10 universities, more than any other location. This success is underpinned by a highly international faculty base, with five universities among Asia’s top 10 for this indicator. Four Hong Kong institutions achieve their best-ever results:

● The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

● The Education University of Hong Kong

● Hong Kong Metropolitan University

● The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong

Performance drivers

Hong Kong’s rise is powered by strong performance in Academic and Employer Reputation, International Faculty, and Inbound Exchange Students.
While HKU secures the top spot, CityUHK leads the region in more individual indicators than any other university in Asia—ranking first for International Faculty, Inbound Exchange, and Outbound Exchange Students. PolyU leads Hong Kong in International Research Network, showcasing the system’s collaborative strength. Hong Kong also attains Asia’s highest average score in Academic Reputation (66.3), surpassing Singapore (61.8) and Brunei Darussalam (52.7).
In Employer Reputation, Hong Kong is second only to Singapore, reflecting strong industry links and graduate outcomes.

While The University of Hong Kong claims the title of Asia’s best university, City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK) distinguishes itself by leading more individual indicators than any other institution in the region. In addition to ranking first in Asia in three indicators, CityUHK leads in Hong Kong in eight performance indicators and also places third in Asia for International Students, fourth for Staff with PhD, 11th for Citations per Paper, 31st for Faculty–Student Ratio, and 47th for Papers per Faculty — highlighting its strength in both teaching quality and research impact. The University of Hong Kong leads domestically in Academic Reputation and Employer Reputation, ranking seventh and 32nd in Asia, respectively. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University tops the city in International Research Network, ranking 22nd regionally in this 10%-weighted indicator. Overall, Hong Kong records the highest average score in Academic Reputation (66.3), ahead of Singapore (61.8) and Brunei Darussalam (52.7). In Employer Reputation — the second most heavily weighted indicator — only Singapore performs better on average. Seven Hong Kong universities improve in Academic Reputation, while six record gains in Employer Reputation.

Building on CityUHK’s mobility success, eight of Hong Kong’s 11 universities rise in Inbound Exchange Students, and five improve in Outbound Exchange Students. However, the 2026 edition also highlights intensifying regional competition, with over 550 new entrants. While Hong Kong’s trajectory remains strongly positive, peers across Asia are improving rapidly in several indicators. Sustained investment and innovation will be essential for Hong Kong institutions to consolidate and extend their regional leadership.

In six indicators - Faculty Student Ratio, Citations per Paper, Papers per Faculty, Staff with PhD, International Research Network and International Students– a majority of Hong Kong institutions drop.

Policy and regional context: Asia’s Higher Education at a turning point

The QS World University Rankings: Asia 2026 reflect a region undergoing significant policy realignment, targeted investment, and shifting student mobility patterns. These structural changes are redefining Asia’s academic power map and shaping where talent, funding, and innovation cluster.

1. Investment and policy leadership in Hong Kong

Hong Kong’s extraordinary rise reflects decisive government investment and policy reforms aimed at cementing the city’s role as a global innovation and education hub.
Since 2020, the Hong Kong SAR Government has:

✔ Allocated HKD 10 billion to strengthen research through InnoHK, establishing world-class clusters in artificial intelligence, healthcare, and advanced materials

✔ Expanded R&D funding via the Research Endowment Fund and new cross-border programmes with the Greater Bay Area

✔ Introduced the Top Talent Pass Scheme to attract global researchers and PhD holders, aligning with universities’ exceptional performance in international faculty indicators

✔ Enhanced support for student and researcher mobility, driving major gains in inbound and outbound exchange participation

Together, these initiatives have created a research–industry–global ecosystem that sets Hong Kong apart as Asia’s most internationally connected higher education system. Its universities now act as bridges between Mainland China and global academia, aligning national research priorities with extensive international collaboration.

2. Regional diversification and strategic competition

The 2026 results confirm a more multipolar Asian higher education landscape.

● Mainland China remains dominant in scale, yet its growth now emphasises quality over expansion, reflecting the maturing phase of the Double First-Class Plan.

● Singapore continues to excel through strategic planning and strong government–industry collaboration, securing global confidence in graduate employability.

● Southeast Asia, particularly Malaysia and Thailand, is gaining momentum due to government-led investments in internationalisation, English-medium programs, and public–private partnerships.

● Meanwhile, Japan and South Korea experience relative stagnation, reflecting demographic pressures and slower adaptation to international recruitment trends.

3. Mobility and internationalisation trends

Student mobility patterns underscore Asia’s transformation from a source to a destination region:

● Hong Kong has emerged as a leading hub for intra-Asian student flows, with rising numbers of inbound students from Mainland China, India, and Southeast Asia.

● City University of Hong Kong now leads all Asian institutions in Inbound and Outbound Exchange Students, a reflection of its strong global engagement policies and the government’s continued investment in academic exchange.

● Malaysia and Singapore also record improved scores for international faculty and student diversity, aligning with national goals to attract regional talent.

4. Research ecosystems and innovation agendas

Research collaboration and impact continue to shape Asia’s competitiveness.

● The Hong Kong Polytechnic University achieves regional prominence for its International Research Network, ranking 22nd overall.

● Hong Kong’s focus on cross-border collaboration with Mainland research institutions—particularly within the Greater Bay Area—has expanded opportunities in applied science and technology transfer.

● India, Indonesia, and Pakistan show growing strength in research output, driven by government digitalisation programs and infrastructure development, though challenges in citation impact persist.

5. Geopolitical and economic realignment

Amid intensifying global competition for talent and research leadership, the rankings illustrate how geopolitical shifts are influencing academic flows.

● Restrictions and uncertainties in some Western destinations have accelerated South–South mobility, with Asia increasingly viewed as a secure, high-quality, and cost-competitive education hub.

● Hong Kong’s bilingual environment, academic excellence, and world-class infrastructure have strengthened its role as a gateway between East and West, appealing to both regional and global students.

6. Implications for policy and planning

The 2026 results reinforce that policy agility, openness, and investment continuity are now the strongest predictors of success. Hong Kong’s model—anchored in internationalisation, research excellence, and targeted talent policy—demonstrates how smaller systems can outperform larger ones through strategic focus. For policymakers, the data underscore the need to balance quantity of participation with quality of outcomes, particularly as competition intensifies with 550 new entrants joining the regional ranking.

Asia overview

Table 5 below shows that Hong Kong’s average performance across all indicators far exceeds regional benchmarks. The table includes only those countries and territories with five or more ranked institutions.

●Five universities break into the top 50 in this edition, including Malaysia’s Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), up nine positions to 44th, Beijing Institute of Technology, which rises from 64th to 45th, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech), up 20 to 46th, Beijing Normal University climbs from 61st to 48th, and China’s Harbin Institute of Technology in 49th from 58th last year. 

●China (Mainland)— QS ranks 395 Chinese universities in this edition—an increase of 261 institutions—nearly tripling last year’s total of 135. This is the largest expansion of any country, and nearly double that of its closest competitor, India, which adds 137 universities to reach 194. In doing so, China reclaims its position as the most represented higher education system in the Asia Rankings, after being overtaken by India last year. China remains the regional leader in research impact, based on Citations per Paper, in which 21 universities are among the top 50. 

●India — India continues to dominate Asian research production, with five universities among the top 10 in Papers per Faculty and 28 among the top 50, more than double its closest competitor in this indicator, China, with two in the top 10 and 14 in the top 50. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) remains the highest ranked Indian university despite dropping out of the top 50 to 59th. 

●Japan — Japan leads in QS’ measure of class size and teaching resources, Faculty per Student, a proxy for learning experience. Three Japanese universities are in the top 10 in this indicator, more than any other country or territory. Meanwhile, the country’s overall drop continues, with 72% of its universities dropping and 10% rising, including its premier institution, The University of Tokyo, which slips from 21st to 26th, despite maintaining its position as Asia’s most well regarded institution among both academics and employers. In the reputational indicators, Japan is among the regional leaders, with more universities among the top 50 in this indicator than any other country or territory. 

●Malaysia — Malaysia is the second most improved higher education system in this edition, with 29 of its previously ranked universities rising and ten dropping while one remains stable, giving it an overall improvement rate of 46%. This improvement is driven by gains in Academic Reputation in which 73% of its universities climb the table. Malaysia’s academic prowess is underpinned by the exceptional performance of its universities in cross-border collaboration, with three among the top 10 in International Research Network, more than any other country or territory. 

●Singapore — Singapore’s concentration of elite universities continues to improve, with 50% of its universities ranked in the top three. Meanwhile, Singapore Management University climbs 18 places to 122nd. Singapore University of Social Sciences ranks for the first time, placing 627th. Singapore University of Technology and Design drops 16 positions to 169th. 

●South Korea — With six universities in the top 20, South Korea shares the highest number of top-20 entries with Mainland China. This year, Kyungpook National University and GIST both enter the top 100, ranking 94th and 99th, respectively. Meanwhile, Sejong University, which placed 100th last year, drops nine positions to 109th. Yonsei University remains South Korea’s highest-ranked institution, placing 11th, down from ninth last year. Across all Korean entries, 31 universities have risen in rank, 53 have fallen, five are new, and 14 remain unchanged. However, Korea’s top-performing universities show a more positive trend—among the 15 institutions ranked within the top 100, 12 have improved their positions. 

●Thailand — Thailand sees 18 universities climb, and 10 drop while six remain stable, giving it an overall improvement rate of 24%. However, its highest ranked institution, Chulalongkorn University drops five positions and out of the top 50, placing 52nd. Mahidol University remains Thailand’s only other top 100 university, ranking 55th. 

●Vietnam — Vietnam National University, Hanoi is crowned Viet Nam’s best university in this edition, climbing three positions to 158th while last year’s leader Duy Tan University drops 28 positions to 165th. Van Lang University is the most improved institution across the entire rankings, climbing 159 places to rank 251st. 

Methodology

The QS Asia Rankings evaluate universities on 11 performance indicators reflecting research, teaching, internationalisation, and employability. Full methodological details are available at QS Asia University Rankings: Methodology | Top Universities      

QS World University Rankings: Asia 2026 Hong Kong Soars as HKU Crowned Asia’s Best for First Time in 15 Years. Image source: bastillepost.

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in Hong Kong and carries the highest mortality rate, not only locally but also globally. Professor Rina Hui, Director of the Centre for Cancer Medicine at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), said that cancer treatment is advancing at an unprecedented pace, with new breakthroughs emerging almost every fortnight. These include antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that are often referred to as "smart chemotherapy", T-cell engagers, and bispecific antibodies, which combine two different antibodies.

With such rapid progress, the curriculum at HKU’s Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine (HKUMed) needs to keep pace. About a year and a half ago, the faculty launched an eight-month integrated cancer medicine course to equip medical students with the latest clinical cancer technologies.

Professor Rina Hui, Director of the Centre for Cancer Medicine at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), Photo by Bastille Post

Professor Hui told Bastille Post that, in Hong Kong, besides lung cancer, the most common cancers include colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. But lung cancer remains the biggest challenge, since its mortality rate is higher than the other three combined.

She said that besides smoking, other risk factors for lung cancer include second‑hand smoke, the second largest contributor, as well as family history, air pollution, kitchen fumes, occupational exposure (e.g., asbestos and radon), and prior radiotherapy. Smoking, however, remains by far the leading cause.

EGFR Mutations Common in HK Lung Adenocarcinoma

Professor Hui noted that Hong Kong's smoking rate has dropped to 8.5%, according to the latest figures released by the Health Bureau in April. While smoking‑related cancers like small cell lung cancer and squamous cell carcinoma are declining, lung adenocarcinoma is increasing, with half of patients carrying EGFR mutations. "Knowing the cancer type and genetic status is the first step for effective treatment," she said.

She also emphasised that the earlier one quits smoking, the lower the risk of getting cancer. "Quitting need not be abrupt. Nicotine patches and chewing gum can serve as supportive aids. The essential step is to discard all cigarettes, eliminate temptation, and reframe quitting as a long‑term health investment," she advised.

Professor Hui suggested that lung cancer screening is essential for high‑risk individuals. Photo source: reference image

Lung Cancer Screening: Essential for High‑Risk Individuals

Last year, the government announced plans to commission local universities to conduct AI‑assisted lung cancer screening. Professor Hui said that HKU and CUHK are currently running relevant trials, given their importance.

"High‑risk people, like those aged 50 to 75, heavy smokers (30 pack‑years), and those exposed to second‑hand smoke, should get screened regularly," she said. "Taiwan offers a noteworthy approach, where they screen non‑smokers with a family history of lung cancer."

She acknowledged that free lung cancer screening for every individual in Hong Kong is unlikely to be feasible at this stage, due to the high costs involved. However, screening could be carried out through collaboration between the government and private healthcare providers, targeting high‑risk groups. "As I tell my patients, getting screened is like saving up to pay taxes. You're actually gaining in the long run. Early detection means better outcomes and lower treatment costs."

She said that lung cancer treatment regimens are becoming increasingly advanced. "Patients with genetic alterations can use targeted therapies; those without can benefit from immunotherapy, and survival rates have improved significantly." However, she also pointed out that lung cancer remains the world's "number one cancer killer", underscoring the urgent need for continued related research and clinical trials.

Recognising the rapid evolution of cancer treatment, HKUMed has launched an eight‑month integrated cancer medicine course starting in October 2024. Photo source: reference image

New Course to Train Future Doctors

Recognising the rapid evolution of cancer treatment, HKUMed has launched an eight‑month integrated cancer medicine course starting in October 2024, which is delivered in six cohorts per year, ensuring that future doctors stay abreast of the latest developments. "We bring together surgeons, researchers, public health experts, oncologists (including medical oncologists and radiation oncologists), pathologists, and radiologists to teach medical students the basics of immunotherapy, targeted therapies, smart chemotherapy, and radiation, so that no matter what field they go into, they'll be able to handle cancer patients when they see them," she said.

New Cancer Treatments Bring New Hope

Beyond well‑established immunotherapy, Professor Hui highlighted emerging treatments:

One is called Antibody‑Drug Conjugate (ADC), often referred to as "smart chemotherapy" or "missile‑guided chemotherapy." "The antibody carries the chemotherapy drug, entering cancer cells with precision like a missile. When the linker dissolves, it releases the drug directly into the cancer cells, killing them effectively," she explained.

She noted that ADCs have now been proven to benefit patients with stage IV metastatic cancer. Clinical trials are currently combining these drugs with immunotherapy, and data have already shown effectiveness in early‑stage triple‑negative breast cancer patients.

Another future trend in cancer treatment is bispecific antibodies, which combine two different antibodies with fewer side effects and a synergistic effect. For example, VEGF bispecific antibodies combine the dual mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti‑angiogenic therapy, and have already shown effectiveness in cancers such as lung and breast cancer. Combining two targeted drugs also results in fewer side effects and better treatment outcomes for lung cancer patients.

T‑Cell Engagers: A Breakthrough for Small Cell Lung Cancer

Professor Hui also mentioned a new treatment trend called T-cell engagers. "For example, a therapy targeting DLL3 on the surface of small cell lung cancer cells — on one side, it targets DLL3, and on the other side, it attracts the immune system's T-cells, which act like soldiers attacking the cancer cells together. This type of drug is already on the market and has been shown to improve overall survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Clinical trials are currently exploring its use in first-line treatment and for stage III patients," she explained.

However, she pointed out that targeted therapy remains a future priority. Since many cancers occur due to genetic alterations, if the genes driving cancer growth can be identified, targeted medications can be utilized and show improved therapeutic efficacy across various cancers. For example, 60% to 70% of breast cancers are hormone receptor-positive, and of those, 30% to 40% have PIK3CA gene mutations. "The corresponding targeted drugs are currently available in Hong Kong, but they are expensive. There is now a phase III clinical trial in which patients can use this type of medication for free, and may even have access to better new drugs. However, patients need to undergo genetic sequencing to confirm whether they have the corresponding genetic mutation before they can participate in the relevant trial," she said.

According to Professor Hui, since many cancers occur due to genetic alterations, if the genes driving cancer growth can be identified, targeted medications can be utilized and show improved therapeutic efficacy across various cancers. Photo by Bastille Post