Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Most Hong Kong students are couch potatoes

Blog

Most Hong Kong students are couch potatoes
Blog

Blog

Most Hong Kong students are couch potatoes

2026-03-23 13:50 Last Updated At:13:50

The figures are astounding: 17.5 percent of our children are obese or overweight with most students (94 per cent) not getting enough exercise, according to a report released by the Department of Health (DH) last week.

The report is a warning. If we do not look after the wellbeing of our children, they will grow up with deficiencies which will hamper their progression throughout their career.

The DH is to be applauded for the thoroughness of its report. During the 2024/25 school year, it assessed 256,000 primary school students and 172,000 secondary school students as to their life styles. The result is that they are lazy when it comes to physical activity. Some, 93.6 per cent of students (91.5 per cent of primary and 95.8 per cent of secondary school students) reported insufficient levels of daily physical activity, i.e. not having at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity daily.

This has consequences, says Dr Chuang Shuk-kwan, consultant in community medicine at the DH. Being overweight during childhood and adolescence adversely affects health, she says, and is associated with a greater risk and earlier onset of various non-communicable diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. Childhood and adolescent obesity can also have adverse psychosocial consequences, affecting students' school performance and quality of life.

Genetics, metabolism, sleep patterns and exposure to stress of adverse childhood events can also contribute to weight gain.

But overall Hong Kong is not doing too badly. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the world average for obese children is 19.8 per cent of school children aged 5-19 globally in 2025. This figure represents more than 391 million children affected by obesity with significant variation by region and country. For example, 33 million in China are estimated to be obese, while 14 million in India and 13 million in the United States are living with obesity. The WHO says that the prevalence of obesity has been increasing with a notable rise in high-income countries and regions.

The Government has been doing its bit. The Financial Secretary, Paul Chan Mo-po recently proposed a $1.2 billion package for the promotion of sport, which would be available through the numerous sports associations in Hong Kong. If schools are smart, they could align themselves to any of these associations for the benefit of their students.

And then the government launched the inaugural Action Plan on Weight Management earlier this month, to bring together the strengths of various government bureaux and departments to enhance collaboration between Chinese and Western medicine. The purpose is to comprehensively promote weight management across Hong Kong through various activities and approaches.

More than 75 per cent of Hong Kong schools have joined these initiatives, which includes recommendations for exercise, diet and balanced screen time.

However, the fight against obesity in our youth also rests with parents and schools.

For a healthy body, sport and diet go hand in glove. In Hong Kong, despite the many sporting activities available their dietary habits are below the optimal dietary levels with about 90 per cent consuming fewer than the recommended servings of fruits and vegetables.

Another factor causing obesity is the extensive recreational use of electronic devices (smart phones, iPads, tablets and computers), which contribute to sedentary behaviour with a high proportion of Hong Kong students exceeding two hours daily, clicking their thumbs playing games on their smart phones. If a student’s legs can move as quickly as their thumbs, they will lead a healthy life and become pillars of society.

School and home environments, neighbor safety and social norms affect food access and activity levels.

At home, it is the responsibility of parents to provide a well-balanced diet for their children and refrain from fatty foods, deep fried foods and fast foods, which despite claims by the providers do not provide the necessary nutritional value required for a healthy body.

Schools are key settings for obesity prevention because children spend considerable time there, making it possible to shape lifelong dietary and physical habits.

Under the guideline provided by the Education Department, schools provide nutritious meals, promote fruit and vegetable consumption and limit unhealthy foods.

In Hong Kong schools either have their own kitchens to offer healthy lunches or they contract the service to outside catering firms. Either way they are carefully monitored to ensure they take out “strongly discouraged food items” from all menu choices and stop the supply of snacks and drinks categorised as “snacks to choose less” to reduce the intake of fat, salt and sugar by students.

Childhood obesity in schools is a multifaceted public health issue requiring a holistic approach. Schools can play a pivotal role by providing healthy meals, promoting physical activity, raising awareness and integrating preventive strategies into daily routines. Coordinated action involving students, parents, teachers, healthcare professionals and policymakers is essential to curb obesity.




Mark Pinkstone

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

While the Washington Post continues to lambast Hong Kong over its National Security Law (NSL), saying recent changes “will chill foreign investment”, the city still enjoys its high ranking in the World Competitive Yearbook (WCY) 2026, a survey undertaken by the International Institute for Management Development.

Hong Kong's global competitiveness has risen for the third consecutive year, up one place to second globally this year, the highest since 2019. It is second only to Singapore and two ranks above Taiwan. The US ranked 10th, 8 points behind Hong Kong.

Among the four competitiveness factors in the WCY 2026, Hong Kong ranks second globally in "government efficiency" and third in "business efficiency". Hong Kong ranks eighth and 11th globally in "infrastructure" and "economic performance" respectively. As regards the various competitiveness sub-factors, Hong Kong tops the rankings in "tax policy" and "business legislation"; ranks second globally in "finance"; third globally in "international trade", "international investment", "management practices" and "education"; and fourth globally in "public finance" and "basic infrastructure".

The Washington Post’s recent commentary on Hong Kong said, “the city’s hardline authorities are making the [NSL] law even more repressive for anyone caught in its net”, that Hong Kong had become “a less secure place to visit or do business” and that the changes “will further chill foreign investment”.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The Hong Kong government said the commentary had exposed the newspaper’s “irrational anti-China stance” and amounted to “wanton slander” and “groundless allegations”.

It is time for the Post to face facts and respect the truth, including honest opinions expressed by its fellow countrymen who invest their money and do business in and with Hong Kong.

The government spokesperson said that, amid rapidly evolving geopolitical dynamics, Hong Kong, with its close connectivity to both the Chinese mainland and the world under the 'one country, two systems' principle, and its sound institutions, open markets and sustained investments in innovation, has become a 'value hub' that offers both security and growth opportunities. In fact, Hong Kong continues to excel in various international rankings including those for economy, finance, and talent.

The International Monetary Fund has also given positive recognition to Hong Kong in recent months, and major credit rating agencies have successively reaffirmed Hong Kong's credit ratings and 'stable' outlook. All these echo the WCY 2026 results.

Even the American Chamber of Commerce here ridiculed the Post by citing an AmCham survey showing increased confidence in the city’s business environment and rule of law.

Last year, Hong Kong knocked Switzerland off its perch for the top spot as the world’s largest cross-border wealth hub while it reclaimed the global initial public offering (IPO) crown for the first time since 2019, with 114 listings raising HK$292 billion. And this year accounting giant Deloitte has estimated that Hong Kong's (IPO) market in the first half of this year had come in second globally, with 78 new listings raising around HK$203.3 billion still with half a year to go.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq claimed the crown for most IPOs after seeing 60 new listings raise HK$872.4 billion during the period, though Deloitte said the stand out performance by the US bourse was largely boosted by SpaceX which alone raised HK$675.8 billion. Without SpaceX's IPO, Hong Kong's stock exchange could have "narrowly surpassed" the Nasdaq to top the world.

The Post is hardly in a position to criticize Hong Kong and should clean up its own backyard before doing so. The troubled Post has been plagued with financial and staff problems in recent years. Staffers also became worried about the CEO and publisher William Lewis’ drinking and uninvolved role in the newsroom. The publisher continued to grapple with declining revenue and readership and sought strategies to regain subscribers lost during the Trump era. In January 2025, the Post announced it will lay off 4 per cent of its staff.

In February 2025, trillionaire wannbe and owner Jeff Bezos announced that the opinion section of the Post would publish only pieces that support "personal liberties and free markets". Within two days of the announcement, it was reported that more than 75,000 digital subscribers had canceled their subscriptions.

As an illustration of its editorial intrusions, the Post editorial board had drafted an endorsement for Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential elections, but it had been blocked by order of Bezos. The move was criticized by former executive editor Martin Baron, who considered it "disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage", and suggested that Bezos was fearing retaliation from US President Donald Trump that could impact Bezos's other businesses.

The Post is “dying in darkness.”

Recommended Articles