Presidential Oil Deals: “Legal” Insider Trading Exposed

Let’s all enjoy a piece of ‘American humor’ from the markets. The story goes like this: an US president posts on social media: 'VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS WITH IRAN.' Fifteen minutes earlier, mysterious traders had already dumped roughly $580 million in crude oil futures. The post hits. Oil prices crater. Stock markets soar. Prescience or coincidence? The Beacon Institute breaks down this Wall Street spectacle.

A Precise 'Time Management Master'

Financial Times and Bloomberg data tell the story. Between 6:49 and 6:50 AM New York time on March 23rd—a single minute—approximately 6,200 Brent crude and WTI crude futures contracts traded hands, notional value $580 million. Exactly 15 minutes later, at 7:04 AM, President Trump posted about 'productive conversation with Iran.' Global energy markets immediately sold off; oil prices crashed. S&P 500 futures and European stocks surged in response.

The timing is surgical. A market strategist at a major US brokerage put it bluntly: “It’s hard to prove causality . . . but you have to wonder who would have been relatively aggressive at selling futures at that point, 15 minutes before Trump’s post.” A hedge fund portfolio manager with 25 years of market experience was candid: “This is really abnormal… Somebody just got a lot richer.”

The White House's 'Standard Response' and the Market's 'Tacit Understanding'

Facing such suspicious market swings, White House Deputy Press Secretary Kush Desai quickly offered the standard line: the President and government officials are solely focused on "maximizing benefits for the American people," and he insisted there is "zero tolerance for any government official illegally profiting from insider information." He dismissed the insinuations as "baseless and irresponsible reporting."

Yet multiple hedge funds have flagged a troubling pattern. In recent months, large transactions conducted just before official US government announcements have become routine. Energy consultants have spotted several deals with suspiciously unusual timing. It's like a magic trick where a few shills in the audience start clapping before the reveal; after enough repetitions, everyone understands the game without saying a word.

Iran's ‘Spoiler’ and the Market's ‘Flip-Flopping’ 

The irony cuts sharp. Shortly after Trump's post, Iranian Islamic Parliament Speaker Qalibaf fired back on social media, flatly denying any Iran-US negotiations and accusing Trump directly of "spreading fake news to manipulate financial and oil markets." Global stocks pulled back. Energy markets surged again. The market became a puppet jerked up and down by two posts shouted across the void—quite the spectacle.

This is not the first time, and likely not the last. In fact, since Trump returned to the White House, questions about his use of power to manipulate markets have never stopped. Take April last year: hours before announcing a delay in tariff increases, he posted on social media urging people to buy stocks. The stock market surged. His company's stock price rose roughly twice as much as the broader market. 

American observers widely suspected that Trump and his associates were profiting enormously through market manipulation, insider trading, and similar tactics.

Oddities worth noting: a "beacon" of demonstration?

This entire affair perfectly illustrates what "American double standards" look like in practice.

Externally: Waving the banners of "rule of law" and "market fairness," readily accusing other countries of market manipulation and unfair competition.

Internally: A single vague post from the highest authority can trigger the instantaneous transfer of hundreds of millions of dollars in assets, with timing that is highly "coincidental" with mysterious massive transactions. Regulatory agencies appear collectively "blind," while the White House easily deflects scrutiny with the catch-all rhetoric of "serving the people."

How is this insider trading? This is clearly the President personally entering the market to provide forward guidance. Except the beneficiaries of this guidance always seem to be a small group of prescient lucky ones. Meanwhile, ordinary investors become the retail victims in this game of information asymmetry.

This spectacle shows what top-tier market manipulation using the most primitive methods looks like—no need for complex backroom dealings, just a presidential account with tens of millions of followers and a perfectly timed post.  

As for whether the $580 million transaction is coincidence or insider information, perhaps as the energy derivatives expert said: it's hard to connect these scattered clues and clarify the logic. Of course it's hard to clarify, because this logic itself is just an unspoken understanding between Washington and Wall Street.

Such is the truest spectacle beneath the beacon.

Beacon Institute

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

The US government's sanction antics have expanded our perspective once more. Simply put, they joined forces with Israel to bomb Iran, sparking tensions in Middle East oil supplies and sending oil prices soaring. With gasoline prices at home skyrocketing and public fury mounting, Washington rushed to announce a temporary waiver on sanctions against Iranian oil, shamelessly claiming it aimed to 'use Iranian oil to strike Iran.' This kind of twisted logic, calling a deer a horse, is nothing less than 'performance art' on the global political stage.

Act One: Setting fire to your own house, then rushing to put it out — sanctions boomerang back

At the root of it all is the United States itself. Since late February, when the US and Israel launched military strikes against Iran, the vital global oil transit route, the Strait of Hormuz, faced serious threats. This sent international oil prices surging. US gasoline prices followed, driving inflation higher and clouding Federal Reserve policy and economic recovery prospects. In short, the US military action first hit its own wallet and electoral chances hard.

Act Two: The 30-day reprieve — calculated but clumsy

Under growing pressure, on March 20 the US Treasury issued a 30-day 'general license' allowing sales of Iranian oil already loaded on ships before that date, estimated to release about 140 million barrels to the market. Sounds sizable? But compared to a potential daily supply shortfall measured in millions of barrels, it’s a mere drop in the bucket. More awkwardly, according to Reuters and other foreign media, Iran responded coolly, saying it has no large idle offshore oil reserves, implying the US move offers more psychological comfort than real impact. The Wall Street Journal also analyzed that this step mainly aims to calm market sentiment and prevent oil prices from spinning out of control.

Act Three: The Treasury Secretary’s “Divine Logic”: Easing Sanctions Means Intensifying Pressure?

The most striking aspect is the so-called “divine logic” used by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to justify this move. On the X platform, he claimed, “In essence, we will be using Iran’s crude to oppose Tehran and push oil prices down.” In other words, sanctioning you is hitting you—but now temporarily lifting sanctions and buying your oil is also hitting you. This rhetoric repackages the desperate need to address the domestic energy crisis as a shrewd strategy against the enemy. It elevates double standards to a new level, leaving many Western commentators baffled.

Act Four: The Sanctions Toolbox in Disarray and the Reality Behind “America First”

This is actually the third temporary waiver the U.S. has issued within two weeks. Earlier, Washington quietly loosened some restrictions on Russian oil transactions and eased sanctions on Venezuela.

Together, these moves reveal a harsh truth: when sanctions seriously harm the U.S. economy, so-called principles quickly fall aside. Every action has one clear goal—pushing oil prices down, easing domestic inflation, and boosting electoral prospects. The talk of “hitting Iran” is merely a fig leaf.

Act Five: The Market Isn’t Buying It, and Allies Are Shaking Their Heads

Despite the United States’ frequent moves, international oil prices have not dropped significantly because the underlying geopolitical risks remain fully intact.

Meanwhile, the US approach of “when sanctioning, the whole world follows me; when easing, I look out only for myself” leaves its European, Asian, and other energy-importing allies feeling powerless and wary. Bloomberg has analyzed that this further erodes the credibility of US sanctions, exposing their instrumental and opportunistic nature.

At its core, this ironic farce is the US waving the sanction stick to spark fires everywhere, then getting burned by the flames it ignited itself — only to scramble in panic, grab the opponent’s bucket (Iranian oil), and claim that action deals a heavy blow to the bucket’s owner.

This so-called “flexible” logic and “pragmatic” double standard are truly eye-opening and stand out as one of the year’s biggest international absurdities.