Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Wall Street Warns: Trump's Troop Cuts Could Ignite a US Debt Crisis

Blog

Wall Street Warns: Trump's Troop Cuts Could Ignite a US Debt Crisis
Blog

Blog

Wall Street Warns: Trump's Troop Cuts Could Ignite a US Debt Crisis

2026-05-08 10:14 Last Updated At:10:14

The "butterfly effect" refers to two seemingly unrelated events, but after one thing happens, it is continuously amplified and has a chain reaction, causing the other to change dramatically. Trump recently announced the withdrawal of 5,000 troops from Germany, signaling that forces in Spain and Italy would also be drawn down. On the surface, this looked like straightforward cost-cutting — a lever to pressure Europe into paying its own defense bills. But the shockwaves crossed the globe and landed on Wall Street.

Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio published an essay arguing that as US military bases continue to shrink, allies will begin to doubt America's "protective power" — and their appetite to buy its "debt currency" will follow. That, Dalio warns, could become the flashpoint for a US debt crisis.

Bridgewater's Ray Dalio warns: as US military bases shrink, so does confidence in the dollar.

Bridgewater's Ray Dalio warns: as US military bases shrink, so does confidence in the dollar.

Make no mistake: this is not empty alarmism. When America scales back its overseas military presence, markets read it as more than a strategic adjustment. It becomes a signal that the very foundations of American financial hegemony are shifting.

Since the war against Iran began, America's military shield in the Gulf has been breached repeatedly. Bases and interception systems have taken hits. The myth of invincibility has shattered. Control of the Strait of Hormuz remains firmly in Iranian hands — and Trump's murmurs that the US "won" ring hollow. Dalio argues that when global leaders begin to question whether America can still win, this reflects a deep underlying anxiety. In his view, if the US appears so overstretched in a localised conflict, the world's willingness to purchase the debt it issues will decline — and a shift in that supply-demand balance is precisely the trigger for a long-term debt crisis.

Trump's incremental troop drawdowns in Germany will also erode confidence in the dollar. Dalio argues that when America's role as the world's policeman comes into question — when its bases and security guarantees are doubted — allies begin to wonder whether American "protective power" can hold up in geopolitical competition. The international order has drifted toward the law of the jungle that "power determines the rules". Under these circumstances, Dalio believes investors should maintain an extremely balanced and diversified portfolio.

Trump pulls 5,000 troops from Germany — a butterfly effect that could shake the dollar's global throne.

Trump pulls 5,000 troops from Germany — a butterfly effect that could shake the dollar's global throne.

The link between dollar dominance and America's global military footprint is intimate. The US currently operates some 750 bases worldwide, with over 220,000 military and civilian support personnel. This is not merely a geopolitical deployment — this "protective umbrella" also underpins the dollar's security as the world's reserve currency. America's display of weakness in the Iran war has already damaged confidence in that umbrella. Further rounds of overseas troop reductions will, over the medium to long term, shake the very foundations of dollar hegemony.

Beyond the troop cuts, Iran's firm grip on the Strait of Hormuz is directly challenging the dollar's status. Dalio earlier cited Kenneth Rogoff — former Chief Economist of the International Monetary Fund — who noted that Iran is enabling China to purchase oil in yuan and pay transit fees in yuan. This will encourage other nations to follow suit, seeking to avoid US financial sanctions. The result: an accelerating pivot toward non-dollar currency systems and diversification strategies that, Dalio argues, will inevitably threaten the dollar's position.

This explains why US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently lashed out, threatening companies contemplating paying Iran's "toll fees" with severe sanctions and zero tolerance. His outburst served two purposes: cut off Iran's financial lifelines, and prevent companies from transacting with Iran in currencies other than the dollar. Once that precedent is set, Bessent knows, there will be endless troubles.

The Trump administration knows the situation is grave and is desperately defending its financial hegemony. But you cannot hold back the rain. In a separate commentary, Dalio pointed out that this year may be the one in which the dollar begins to truly crack. Its safe-haven function is weakening for three reasons: markets are concerned that US debt levels are excessive; American protectionism is eroding trust in the dollar; and Federal Reserve policy has been highly volatile and unpredictable. If those cracks widen, the pressure on American financial hegemony will only intensify.

This does not even account for the outcome of the Iran war. If Dalio's words prove accurate — that the US is overstretched in this conflict and falls well short of Trump's proclaimed "overwhelming victory" — and troop reductions continue apace, global confidence in the dollar will inevitably decline. As Dalio predicts, when the supply-demand balance shifts, that will be the tiipping point of America's long-term debt crisis.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

Old habits die hard. Trump has never hidden his male supremacist streak, and he once boasted that "real men" can touch women however they please. Becoming president changed nothing. He has now dragged that same ugly habit into diplomacy.

On July 5th, he showed his true colors again, posting an image on social media implying Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is infatuated with him, and sneering that a "restraining order" is needed to keep her away. A deeply insulting insinuation, and it marks his second public jab at her in recent weeks. He earlier claimed she begged him for a photo at the G7 summit like an obsessive fan. Meloni denied it flatly and fired back hard, triggering a diplomatic spat.

Trump posts Meloni photo: "Restraining order needed." Blatant insult.

Trump posts Meloni photo: "Restraining order needed." Blatant insult.

Analysts see something more calculated at work here than a simple ego trip. Trump's insults are not just about satisfying a male supremacist mindset, they say. He appears to be using ridicule as a tool to assert dominance over female heads of state. Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi presents a striking contrast: she tolerates the same treatment, and even seems pleased with it.

Before departing for Turkey today for the NATO summit, Trump posted a photo on Truth Social showing Meloni looking up at him with what he framed as an adoring gaze. His caption read: "Restraining order needed." The image builds a false narrative, one where Meloni is portrayed as obsessively infatuated with him and needing legal intervention to stay away.

Crude by any diplomatic standard. A mix of suggestive language, condescension, and mockery. His team appears to have combed through countless photos of the two leaders, cropped and framed one fleeting moment, then dressed it up with provocative text to manufacture the illusion of Meloni's infatuation.

This is not the first time Trump has targeted her this way. After last month's G7 summit, he posted that Meloni "was probably happy I talked to her" and that "I wouldn’t have even done it, but I felt sorry for her." He went further, claiming she "begged me to take a picture with her". The remarks painted a head of government as an overzealous fan pestering him for attention.

Such flippant, degrading language is a serious affront when directed at the head of a sovereign government. Meloni rejected the claims immediately, calling them "completely fabricated." Her rebuke was sharp: "I do not know why the president of the United States behaves this way toward his allies — it is certainly not the first time this has happened. There is one thing he must remember: Neither I nor Italy ever beg."

Meloni's firm pushback won her applause both at home and abroad. Trump, rather than backing off, escalated instead. Analysts believe two specific grievances are fueling his renewed attacks on her, beyond his general appetite for belittling women.

First, Meloni opposed the U.S. strike on Iran and refused to let American warplanes use bases in Sicily. Second, when Pope Leo XIV publicly condemned the war, saying those who start wars have blood on their hands, Trump lashed out and accused the Pope of being "weak on crime." Meloni sided with the Pope on that occasion too, calling Trump's attack "unacceptable" and defending the Pope's condemnation of war as entirely justified. Those two stances reportedly angered Trump, and his renewed mockery looks like an attempt to settle the score.

Insults, ridicule, and verbal attacks are standard tools in Trump's diplomatic toolbox, used on friend and foe alike. He has deployed the same tactic against Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, describing her as "she thinks I did a great job", carrying the tone of a fan idolizing a celebrity. Many Japanese citizens found the framing disrespectful toward their own leader.

Takaichi: Trump's "number one fan." She's thrilled, unlike furious Meloni.

Takaichi: Trump's "number one fan." She's thrilled, unlike furious Meloni.

Unlike Meloni, Takaichi has shown no anger in response. She appears receptive, even pleased, effectively accepting the role of a devoted fan. Some Japanese citizens have criticized her for this, calling her overly pro-American and lacking in dignity.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles