CIA Director Ratcliffe slipped into Moscow on August 25 for a secret meeting with Russian officials. But first, the US had to ask its ally Ukraine to suspend attacks on Moscow. Just to clear a path for the visit.
The US always loudly proclaims its unwavering support for Ukraine. This time, it had to swallow its pride and fly to Moscow, begging for a meeting.
Four Hours, Kremlin's Terms
In the morning of August 25, a US Air Force C-17A Globemaster III slipped into Moscow's Vnukovo Airport, after a quiet transit through Riga, Latvia. Almost simultaneously, a US diplomatic motorcade was spotted on Moscow streets, and word of CIA Director Ratcliffe's visit began to leak.
The whole meeting lasted barely four hours. By 7 p.m., the transport plane was already gone, lifting off from Vnukovo.
It was Ratcliffe's first known trip to Russia as CIA director. And the highest-level US visit to Moscow since the Trump administration took power in January 2025.
A US Air Force C-17A quietly lands at Moscow's Vnukovo Airport on August 25.
From start to finish, the Kremlin acted like a host in total control. Spokesman Peskov initially pleaded ignorance. No meetings with US officials were scheduled this week, he said. The message was clear: we decide if we meet, not you.
By August 26, Peskov confirmed the visit involved intelligence contacts. But he stressed that President Putin did not meet Ratcliffe in person. He only received a briefing afterward. As for whether this contact could pull Russia-US relations out of their deep freeze, Moscow was cool and reserved. Peskov said it was too early to draw any conclusions.
The reality is, Moscow decided everything: whether to meet, when, and who would do the receiving. The US could only follow Moscow's script.
Multiple US media outlets, citing informed sources on August 26-27, disclosed the secret meeting's content. Ostensibly, Ratcliffe went to Moscow to negotiate. In reality, it was more like a personal visit to test Russia's bottom line. He asked Russia not to take action against NATO members, especially the three Baltic states that have long feared being targeted.
Let's be blunt. These small European nations have been constantly complaining to the US, claiming they're under threat. The US, playing big brother, felt it had to at least make a gesture. So it flew to Moscow to say a few fair words on behalf of its little brothers, telling Russia not to bully them. As for the effect? That depends on whether Russia decides to give face.
Iran, Denials and Rumors
Beyond NATO, Ratcliffe also raised the Iran issue. He warned that if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, the US will slap additional sanctions on Iran. But think about it: even this message had to be delivered in person by America's top intelligence official. That alone shows how limited Washington's real influence over Russia is. They had to send the CIA director just to pass a note.
Ratcliffe's mission: persuade Russia not to target NATO's Baltic states.
Then Trump stepped in. On August 26, he flatly denied the whole story in a radio interview. Ratcliffe's trip, he insisted, was about ending the Russia-Ukraine war. It had nothing to do with Russia testing NATO or Iran sanctions.
The problem? Washington can't even get its own story straight. The media says the trip was to stand up for European junior partners. The president says it was only about peace. That kind of chaos reveals a deeper truth: the US is on the back foot, scrambling to cobble together a coherent public line.
Swap Rumors, Empty Hands
Then there's the rumor mill. One online claim says Putin used the meeting to demand US guarantees: no future Western prosecution would force him into exile, and his frozen overseas assets would be released. It's a wild story. And it has no basis. Russia is a major power. Putin is a hardliner. He's not about to beg for exile guarantees.
So why do these rumors circulate? They reflect the anxiety gnawing at some in Washington. People are so jittery about these talks they're dreaming up unrealistic scenarios. And let's be clear: no Russian source has ever confirmed any of it.
But here's what really matters: the US choreography before the trip. Reports say Washington tipped off Ukraine well in advance. Ratcliffe was coming to Moscow, and Kyiv was told to hold its fire. No attacks on Moscow or other areas until the 'foreign guests' were gone. The ceasefire even stretched to St. Petersburg and northern Russia, lasting through August 26.
Think about that. The US constantly trumpets its support for Ukraine on the world stage. But when it needed to sneak into Moscow, it told its 'junior partner' to stand down. Hold your fire so we can do our secret diplomacy. That's the reality.
Some analysts see an echo of 2021. Back then, CIA Director Burns was dispatched to Moscow to lobby Putin: don't send troops into Ukraine. Now the US is sending envoys again, asking for restraint. But the ask has changed. This time, the message is: don't take further action against NATO.
Ratcliffe's trip lands at a stalled moment. The US-brokered peace talks are going nowhere. Since early this year, when Trump's envoy Witkoff and son-in-law Kushner visited Russia with a peace plan, negotiations have been stuck. The sticking points? Territorial division, security guarantees, ceasefire conditions. Meanwhile, the conflict grinds on.
Another online theory: the secret visit was about a prisoner swap. The possible prize? Charles Zimmerman, an American convicted in Russia. That's Ratcliffe's turf. He's personally led several US-Russia prisoner exchanges. But again, no confirmation.
To clear his path, Ratcliffe reportedly asked Ukraine to stop striking Moscow.
It was billed as a grand diplomatic offensive to unite allies against Russia. Instead, the US flew to Moscow, hat in hand, to seek talks, mouthing a few perfunctory words for its European junior partners. And it even told Ukraine, another junior partner, to step aside and cooperate.
The top US intelligence official personally boarded a transport plane and flew straight to Moscow. Would he be received? At what time? By whom? Moscow decided it all.
Deep Throat
** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **
