Chinese swimmers have stood up to the scrutiny of repeated doping tests, winning gold medals in a "fair and square" manner during the Paris Olympics, two experts in sports said on Monday.
Speaking with China Global Television Network (CGTN), Daily National sports editor Mike Bako and president of Axis Leisure Management Justin Downes shared their views on the frequent doping tests the Chinese swimmers have been subjected to during the Games, and the team's gold-winning performance in the men's 100-meter freestyle and in the men's 4x100 meters swimming medley.
Chinese swimmer Pan Zhanle broke the world record to win an Olympic gold in men's 100-meter freestyle last Wednesday. And on Sunday, Pan led his three teammates to victory in the men's 4x100 meters swimming medley, ending the United States' 64-year unbeaten run in the event.
The victories came as doubts about doping have overshadowed the Chinese swimming team, despite the athletes' repeated clean test results.
According to World Aquatics, swimming's governing body, anti-doping organizations tested each Chinese swimmer an average of 21 times since Jan. 1. The number was significantly higher compared to the average of six times for American and four times for Australian swimmers.
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has also reviewed the Chinese athletes' case and found no evidence to dispute a previous contamination scenario related to the Chinese team.
Bako said the unfair accusations aim to stigmatize the Chinese swimming team, which is among the world's most dominant.
"There is this stigma that is there. Even though they are the most tested, even though there have been Olympic officials that have come out and said that, 'Yes, they are the most tested. Yes, there is no red flags. Yes, there are no positives yet.' But still, when it comes on this stage at the most prestigious of races, whether it be the 100 meters or certainly from a team perspective, the 4x100, when the race that has the most scrutiny is won by someone in such dominating fashion and such historic fashion, that's where all of the emphasis is going to be and that's where it is right now. Certainly, the spotlight shines the brightest, but if there are no positive tests to come of this, then of course they get the headlines and they get the glory," he said.
Downes expressed his confidence in WADA's credibility and impartiality, and believes the Chinese Olympic swimmers follow the rules in competition.
"I think WADA is a robust, long-serving association. I mean, this is their sole job is to protect athletes and protect the sport from any indiscretion. So, I think, no one wants to lose and I think everybody wants to find fault in the system, to prove that they're better. I hope that's not really the case. But I have to believe that WADA is at no fault. Maybe they need to upscale their testing mechanisms in the future. I don't believe that's the case because they've been doing this for so long. So, I think I truly believe that the Chinese team is clean. They won these events and are wining these events fair and square. I think they're competing on the same platform and playing field as every other athlete at these Games. China is becoming a powerhouse in the world of sport and obviously in the world of swimming. And this is new, and this is scary for the dominating nations," he said.
Chinese swimmers' Olympic win "fair and square": experts
The sweeping U.S. tariffs on imports are expected to increase household expenses, erode consumer spending power and worsen financial strain on American families, U.S. economic organizations and experts have warned.
The warning came following a series of moves adopted by the U.S. to impose tariffs on imports. It began with the executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump on April 2, which says that the U.S. will begin imposing a 10 percent "minimum baseline tariff" on all trade partners starting April 5. And then higher "reciprocal tariffs" will be levied on imports from certain partners, with these measures taking effect on April 9. Certain sectors, including vehicles, auto parts, steel and aluminum, are hit with even steeper 25-percent duties.
U.S. economists and business leaders have warned that the tariff increases will drive up prices, ultimately being passed on to consumers.
Concerned about soaring costs, some American consumers have already started stockpiling goods.
Trump aims to pressure other countries by imposing "reciprocal tariffs," which could come at a particularly high cost for U.S. consumers. With consumer confidence already on the decline, these tariffs are expected to further increase household expenses, erode consumer spending power, worsen financial strain, and add to the burden on American families, according to the economic organizations and experts.
The Yale University Budget Lab estimates that after the U.S. implements "reciprocal tariffs," if other countries retaliate, American households will face significant losses: an average of 1,300 U.S. dollars for low-income families, 2,100 U.S. dollars for middle-income families, and 5,400 U.S. dollars for high-income families.
According to analysis from the Yale University Budget Lab, the new tariff policies announced by the U.S. government could lead to a 2.3 percent increase in overall inflation this year, with food prices rising by 2.8 percent and car prices by 8.4 percent. This would result in an annual loss of 3,800 U.S. dollars for the average American household.
According to estimates from the U.S. think tank Tax Foundation, without considering retaliatory measures from other countries and regions, the U.S. "reciprocal tariff" policy will result in the following this year: Federal tax revenue will increase by 258.4 billion U.S. dollars, or 0.85 percent of the GDP, while after-tax income for U.S. individuals will decrease by an average of 1.9 percent. The average American household will face an additional 1,900 U.S. dollars in annual tax burdens.
For U.S. consumers, high tariffs could mean price hikes on everything from cars and home appliances to gasoline and groceries.
According to predictions from the Yale University Budget Lab, prices for products in categories such as leather goods, clothing, crops, metals and wool are expected to rise by more than 10 percent.
On Wednesday afternoon, renowned U.S. investor and billionaire Mark Cuban wrote on social media that it was time to start stockpiling goods.
"From toothpaste to soap, anything you can find storage space for, buy before they have to replenish inventory. Even if it's made in the USA, they will jack up the price and blame it on tariffs."
The U.S. policy of imposing a 25 percent tariff on imported cars officially took effect on April 3.
Many industry experts believe that the automobile industry, which heavily relies on global supply chains, cannot achieve the goal of "national exclusivity" through high tariffs.
Instead, it will make cars less affordable for more Americans, reduce the competitiveness of the U.S. auto industry, and increase the risk of a greater economic slowdown in the country.
Industry insiders believe that U.S. automakers will struggle to bear the cost pressures brought on by the 25 percent import tariff. According to estimates from JPMorgan, after the auto tariffs take effect, General Motors will be required to pay up to 13 billion U.S. dollars in import tariffs annually, while Ford will face around 4.5 billion U.S. dollars in import duties.
Some industry insiders said they believe that under the impact of tariffs, the U.S. auto industry may slide toward higher prices and lower quality.
A report from the Bank of America suggests that the auto tariffs could result in a decline of 3 million vehicle sales in the U.S., which is nearly one-fifth of last year's total sales.
Several U.S. financial institutions have analyzed the situation, warning that the tariff increases could potentially push the U.S. economy into a recession.
Mark Zandi, Chief Economist at Moody's Analytics, stated on social media on April 3 that if the U.S. fully and continuously implements its tariff policy, the country will suffer a severe recession -- even if it manages to avoid a full-blown depression.
On April 3, Citigroup released an investment strategy report stating that if the impact of U.S. tariffs cannot be eliminated through negotiations, the U.S. GDP growth for 2025 could be "wiped out."
Tariffs expected to raise household costs, weakening consumer spending, financial stability: reports
