Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Trade Talks Yield Progress as China Presses US to Roll Back Tariffs

Blog

Trade Talks Yield Progress as China Presses US to Roll Back Tariffs
Blog

Blog

Trade Talks Yield Progress as China Presses US to Roll Back Tariffs

2025-05-13 21:18 Last Updated At:21:18

After two days of closed-door negotiations in Geneva, senior economic and trade officials from China and the United States issued a joint statement on Monday (May 12), local time, pledging to reduce tariffs within 90 days. Under the agreement, China will lower its retaliatory tariffs on US goods from 125% to 10%, while the United States will cut its tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%. Both sides agreed to suspend 24% of the tariffs during the 90-day period. The news was met with relief by the international community, with many observers noting that the outcome exceeded market expectations and averted a full-blown trade war. European and Asian stocks rose, and US markets closed higher.

While markets responded positively, analysts cautioned that the results remain provisional, with core disputes in the China–US economic relationship unresolved. Still, the talks have laid a promising foundation for further engagement. The People’s Daily described the agreement as “a good start,” but insisted that a lasting solution would require Washington to fully reverse its “erroneous practice of unilateral tariff increases.”

He Lifeng, China’s chief negotiator and Vice Premier, described the talks as “frank, in-depth, and constructive,” calling them important steps toward resolving differences through dialogue.

He Lifeng, China’s chief negotiator and Vice Premier, described the talks as “frank, in-depth, and constructive,” calling them important steps toward resolving differences through dialogue.

Analysts cited by CNBC echoed this view, warning against expectations of a swift resolution to the trade dispute. Nevertheless, they acknowledged that the consensus reached by both sides has eased tensions and created a constructive starting point. Deutsche Bank strategists told CNBC that while it is difficult to predict developments after 90 days, the immediate market impact is clearly positive. Mikkel Emil Jensen, a senior analyst at Denmark’s Sydbank, said the announcement had eliminated much of the uncertainty surrounding global trade and could trigger a positive chain reaction, boosting demand for container shipping.

William Xin, chairman of Chunshan Pujiang (Shanghai) Investment Management Co., said the outcome far exceeded market expectations and brought greater certainty to China’s stock market and the Renminbi, both of which are likely to trend upward in the near term.

World Trade Organization Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala also issued a statement, calling the talks “a significant step forward” and expressing hope for a brighter future. Amid ongoing global tensions, she said, this progress is critical not only for China and the United States but also for the world’s most vulnerable economies.

However, Jane Foley, head of foreign exchange strategy at Rabobank, noted that the suspension period is only 90 days and that the 10 percent “base tariff” announced by the United States remains in place. She cautioned that significant uncertainty persists regarding the ultimate resolution of the tariff dispute and its impact on global economic growth and central bank policy.

It is widely believed that the China–US trade talks have produced only temporary results, and the true test will come after the 90-day period.

It is widely believed that the China–US trade talks have produced only temporary results, and the true test will come after the 90-day period.

Changtai Xu, chief market strategist for Asia Pacific at JPMorgan Asset Management, echoed these concerns, saying that markets are awaiting further details about the agreement.

Zhang Zhiwei, chief economist at Hong Kong’s Pinpoint Asset Management, said investors’ short-term concerns about disruptions to global supply chains have been largely alleviated, but described the three-month tariff reduction as merely the beginning of a protracted negotiation process. He predicted it could take months for both sides to reach a comprehensive solution, but called the latest round of talks “a very good starting point.”

Reuters, citing unnamed sources, reported that even with progress in the talks, China is unlikely to lift export controls on a range of rare earth elements, though it may accelerate the approval of export licenses. The report noted that rare earth export controls are part of a broader strategy to preserve China’s dominance in mining and processing key minerals. While a complete removal of restrictions is unlikely, Beijing may expedite license approvals in response to the easing of trade tensions.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reiterated that both sides agreed there is no desire to “decouple.”

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reiterated that both sides agreed there is no desire to “decouple.”

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said both sides agreed during the talks that neither wants “a decoupling”. He described the discussions as “always respectful,” and said both countries share common interests and a commitment to trade balance.“So it was always respectful. We have the two largest economies in the world. We were firm and we moved forward. We tried to identify shared interests. We came with a list of problems that we were trying to solve, and I think we did a good job on that.”

A spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Commerce said the joint statement marked a significant step toward resolving differences through dialogue and consultation, laying the groundwork for further narrowing gaps and deepening cooperation. Both sides recognized the importance of stable, sustainable, and mutually beneficial economic and trade relations, and agreed to establish a consultation mechanism to maintain close communication on issues of mutual concern. Future consultations will be held regularly or as needed in China, the United States, or a mutually agreed third country.

The People’s Daily article emphasized that international opinion has praised the outcome, underscoring that maintaining healthy, stable, and sustainable China–US economic ties serves the fundamental interests of both nations and supports global economic growth.

The article concluded that the significance of the talks lies not only in the concrete results achieved but also in both sides’ reaffirmation of equal dialogue and consultation as the path to resolving differences. While the road ahead may be challenging, China expressed its willingness to work with the United States to build on the momentum, maintain pragmatic engagement, and expand cooperation for the benefit of both countries and the world.




Mao Paishou

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

Sweeping tariffs rolled out by the new US administration are rattling global trade and hitting millions of American families at home. Across the media landscape, warnings abound: consumer prices are climbing, and The New York Times bluntly asks whether Americans can even picture daily life without Chinese-made goods.

American Households and the “Made in China” Bind

A recent New York Times visual analysis illustrate vividly the extent of American dependence on Chinese imports. 

Visualization from The New York Times

Visualization from The New York Times

The report color-coded everyday products by their Chinese import share : gray for less than 20%, Green, 20-40%, Yellow, 40-60%, Orange, 60-80%, and red for over 80%.

More than 99 percent of toasters in American homes are imported from China.

More than 99 percent of toasters in American homes are imported from China.

The takeaway: many household essentials are overwhelmingly sourced from China, and new tariffs threaten to push prices even higher.

Step into any American kitchen and you’ll find that nearly every toaster, actually up to more than 99%, is made in China. Personal care staples like makeup brushes, nail clippers, and combs, almost all bear the “Made in China” label.

The pattern repeats throughout the American home: metal patio chairs, charcoal grills, umbrellas, computer monitors, desk lamps, first-aid kits, irons, flashlights, fireworks, baby strollers, and Christmas ornaments – 70% to 90% of these goods come from Chinese factories.

98 percent of umbrellas (red) sold in the United States come from China.

98 percent of umbrellas (red) sold in the United States come from China.

Decades of manufacturing investment have made China the world’s workshop, producing nearly one-third of all physical goods -- more than the US, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and the UK combined. As the South China Morning Post once quipped, even the pen President Trump used to sign his tariff orders was likely made in China.

No Fireworks for the 250th National Day Celebration?

America’s reliance on Chinese manufacturing extends to its most cherished celebrations. Between February 2024 and January 2025, the U.S. imported $508 million in fireworks – 95% from China. With tariffs now as high as 145%, fireworks companies have halted orders from Chinese suppliers. The United States’ 250th National Day Celebration might go without fireworks.

Stacy Schneitter Blake, president of the National Fireworks Association (NFA) and co-owner of Schneider Fireworks, says the industry is facing an unprecedented crisis.  With Chinese factories soon to pause for their summer recess, she warns that unless tariffs are lifted soon, American importers may miss the window for placing orders for the 250th Independence Day celebrations next year.

The NFA and The American Pyrotechnics Association (APA) have jointly pleaded for relief, stressing that 99% of consumer fireworks and 75% of display fireworks come from China, and that there is simply no domestic alternative. “Tariffs will not incentivize US production. They will only increase costs. The reality is that there are no manufacturing alternatives available outside of China,” the associations stated.

Julie Heckman, CEO of the APA says bluntly, “Fireworks will not be manufactured in the US. It’s just impossible. We don’t have the necessary raw materials or chemicals, and even if someone wanted to start, you’d have to import all the chemicals.”

In early April, the APA sent a letter to Trump asking him to remove the tariffs on fireworks. In the letter, the association referenced the Trump administration’s 2019 decision to exempt the fireworks industry from similar tariffs, emphasizing the sector’s unique characteristics and its significance to American traditions. The APA urged the administration to take sensible action now.

Businesses Squeezed-“Am I to Sell Bald Dolls?”

The impact of tariffs is rippling through the broader economy. According to data from SmartScout, average prices for nearly a thousand products on Amazon jumped 29% after the April tariff hikes, hitting categories from clothing and jewelry to toys and electronics. Many businesses that rely on Chinese suppliers are freezing shipments and suspending orders, sending shockwaves through supply chains.

Screenshot from CNN report

Screenshot from CNN report

The US toy industry is particularly exposed: nearly 80% of all toys sold in America are made in China. Isaac Larian, CEO of MGA Entertainment, says he’s been left with no choice. “We have no choice but to increase our prices by double digits. The life of my business, 46 years, is on the line.” He stressed that domestic sourcing isn’t an option. The US doesn’t produce the materials needed for doll hair, for example. “What am I supposed to do – sell bald dolls?” he asks in despair.

Jay Foreman, CEO of Basic Fun!, says his entire supply chain is tied to China. Higher tariffs, he warns, threaten not just prices and supply, but the very survival of the US toy industry.

Economic Fallout Mounts - “Americans Will Miss Chinese Goods Most”

The broader economic toll is becoming clear. Ryan Petersen, founder of Flexport, reports that container bookings from China to the US have plunged by over 60% in three weeks since tariffs took effect. Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, warns that store shelves could be bare within weeks, with layoffs looming for dockworkers, truck drivers, and retail staff.

Gary Cohn, former chief economic adviser to Trump, sums up the dilemma: “I think we're all starting to realize that the country we're most dependent upon in the United States and for our shelves and what we would miss the most would be what comes out of China.”

Recommended Articles