Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Turning away from China is losing the Future: Multinational Carmakers Warned by Foreign Media

Blog

Turning away from China is losing the Future: Multinational Carmakers Warned by Foreign Media
Blog

Blog

Turning away from China is losing the Future: Multinational Carmakers Warned by Foreign Media

2025-10-13 19:26 Last Updated At:19:26

Let's cut to the chase. As Hans Greimel, Asia Editor for Detroit's Automotive News, recently put it in a piece for Nikkei Asia: "Global carmakers must stay in China so they can compete outside China." It's a blunt assessment, but it’s the stone-cold truth.

The IAA Mobility, a legacy auto show. Munich, Germany,  September this year

The IAA Mobility, a legacy auto show. Munich, Germany,  September this year

China isn't just the planet's biggest auto market—it's the brutal “boot camp” where the future of the industry will be forged. Get knocked out here, and you risk losing your edge everywhere else. In the last few years, the Chinese market has transformed into the most unforgiving battlefield for global car companies. Some have packed their bags and fled; others are digging in, gritting their teeth to survive.

The Game Has Changed

Greimel nails it: for the legacy auto giants, China is "no easy proposition" for making a quick buck anymore. It’s a high-stakes exam where survival is the only grade that matters.

Just a decade ago, foreign brands commanded a whopping 60% of the Chinese market. Today? That number has plummeted to less than 40%. They've been completely outmaneuvered by homegrown powerhouses like BYD, Geely, and XPeng, especially in the all-important new energy vehicle sector.

XPeng hits the stage in Munich, putting the world on notice that China's EV titans are going global.

XPeng hits the stage in Munich, putting the world on notice that China's EV titans are going global.

This shift wasn't gradual; it was a total reset. It feels like yesterday that Chinese carmakers were still playing catch-up, learning the tech and patching their weak spots. Now, they boast a complete, vertically integrated industrial chain and an innovation ecosystem that's second to none. From the battery titan CATL to massive investments in smart driving from Baidu and Xiaomi, China's auto industry has built a fortress of systemic advantages.

This means that any multinational car company that bails on China isn't just giving up sales—they're forfeiting a front-row seat to the industry's next great transformation. Greimel puts it starkly: "The danger is being more easily bowled over when Chinese brands eventually flood into global markets. And make no mistake, the Chinese brands are coming."

BYD's Seal 6 DM-i Touring on display in Germany—another sign that Chinese innovation is ready for export.

BYD's Seal 6 DM-i Touring on display in Germany—another sign that Chinese innovation is ready for export.

Learn in China, or Perish Globally

Sticking it out in China is about forging steel in the hottest fire. Only the brands that can make it here will have what it takes to secure a foothold on the world stage.

Greimel points to Nissan and General Motors as prime examples. Their initial strategy was lazy: just bring their overseas EV models to China and expect them to sell. The market’s response? A resounding "no, thanks." Chinese consumers demand more than just a ride from A to B; they want cutting-edge intelligence, slick design, and incredible value for their money.

These spectacular failures were a wake-up call, forcing these multinationals to completely rethink their approach. Nissan empowered its Chinese team to lead R&D and design models specifically for the local market. The result? Sales stopped bleeding and started climbing. GM did the same, leaning on its China R&D center to roll out platforms built from the ground up for Chinese drivers.

From "Made for China" to "Made in China for the World"

Today, everyone from Toyota and Volkswagen to Ford and Audi is getting with the program. They are launching products developed in China and then exporting them globally. The playbook is evolving from "(made) In China For China" to "(made) In China for the World." It’s a dawning realization among multinationals that China is no longer just a market—it’s a global wellspring of innovation.

Greimel argues this model is quietly rewriting the entire logic of the global auto industry. In today’s Chinese auto market, price wars are absolutely savage, technology evolves at a dizzying pace, and consumer patience is zero. Launch a new car without a spark of innovation or genuine effort, and the market will chew it up and spit it out before you can blink.

This pressure-cooker environment forces foreign car companies to master "China speed." New product development cycles are slashed to under two years, with R&D and market feedback happening in lockstep. This is the kind of rapid-response agility they simply can't learn anywhere else.

The Ultimate Litmus Test

As Greimel notes, the truly smart companies don't see China as some external challenge but a dynamic arena for learning and co-creation. The firms that manage to survive the gauntlet in China will emerge tougher and more resilient than their rivals, precisely because they've learned how to innovate and win in the world's most demanding environment.

This explains why more and more multinationals are doubling down on their investments in China, even if the profit margins aren't what they once were. For them, China is both a final exam and a masterclass. You might lose the short-term market share battle but still win the long-term war for the future.

In this new era of global industrial realignment, holding your ground in the Chinese market gives you the confidence to compete anywhere. The alternative—retreating to home turf to protect old interests—is a recipe for disaster. The real crisis will hit when Chinese brands make their inevitable landing in Europe and the Americas.

"The smart legacy brands will choose to keep fighting it out there. After all, if they can successfully compete against Chinese rivals in China, they can compete against them anywhere." In this new chapter of globalization, China is more than a market—it's the ultimate litmus test for competitiveness. Only those willing to stay, learn, and adapt have any right to talk about "globalization."




Mao Paishou

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

Trump blasted out a warning on his social media platform Truth Social about China’s tough stance on trade. He claimed “China sent an extremely hostile letter to the world” by announcing that starting November 1, 2025, it will “impose large-scale export controls on nearly every product they make, and some not even made by them”.

The US, striking back, plans to “impose a tariff of 100% on China, over and above any tariff they are currently paying”, plus export controls on critical software. This move will also start on November 1, 2025.

And, Trump criticized China’s rare earth export limits and said that there was no reason for meeting with Xi Jinping at the upcoming APEC summit in South Korea — though he later softened the tone, saying the meeting might still take place.

Markets React: Stock Sell-Off

The market slammed back hard after Trump’s announcement. On “Black Friday,” the Dow plunged 878 points to 45,479 and the Nasdaq tumbled 3.56%, closing at 22,204.

Trump: “Starting November 1st, 2025, the United States will impose a Tariff of 100% on China, over and above any Tariff they are currently paying.”

Trump: “Starting November 1st, 2025, the United States will impose a Tariff of 100% on China, over and above any Tariff they are currently paying.”

Meanwhile, China’s Ministry of Commerce unveiled new rare earth export controls: any foreign exporter dealing in products with over 0.1% China-sourced rare earths or using Chinese extraction/magnet-making tech now needs an export licence. Controls on permanent rare earth magnets will kick in from December 1.

Trump says China’s move caught him off guard and insists the US is only responding. When asked if the US might lift tariffs if China backs down, he was noncommittal, saying it depends on future developments. He claims a good relationship with Xi Jinping but was blindsided. And he warned the US has plenty of tools beyond tariffs and software controls, including export controls on planes and parts.

Back in August, both sides agreed to suspend 24% tariffs for 90 days, a truce expiring November 9.

China gets tough: New export rules for rare earths—license needed if even 0.1% comes from China.

China gets tough: New export rules for rare earths—license needed if even 0.1% comes from China.

But tensions have been simmering. The US trade office targeted China’s maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries earlier this year and announced port fees on Chinese vessels starting October 14—violating international trade norms and agreements.

China Hits Back with Countermeasures

In response, China’s Ministry of Transport announced a “special port fee” on ships linked to the US starting October 14. The Ministry of Commerce emphasized these are fair defensive measures to protect competitive shipping and shipbuilding markets internationally.

According to Reuters, China has become the top shipbuilder worldwide over the past 20 years, and is now capable of commercial and military projects simultaneously. The US port fees are part of a wider push to revive American shipbuilding and curb China’s maritime strength.

Experts quoted by Reuters say China’s countermeasure shows the tariff truce is fragile at best.

A soybean trader noted China remains annoyed and likely won’t resume US farm imports soon. Despite that, agricultural trade impact may be limited as imports have already shrunk since the tariff war started. Bloomberg reported that after China’s announcement, global logistics reacted fast: some oil tankers canceled bookings to China, and charter rates for coal and iron ore carriers spiked.

Bloomberg also highlighted the massive impact of China’s port fee: RMB 400 per ton, or about $56, meaning a super-large crude carrier docking pays an extra $6.2 million each time. Analysts call this significant already.

Ship showdown: China slaps special port fees on US-linked vessels—fight fire with fire.

Ship showdown: China slaps special port fees on US-linked vessels—fight fire with fire.

CNBC quoted Peter Alexander of Z-Ben Advisors saying the US made the first move, and China’s just returning fire — “just more tit-for-tat negotiating tactics. The US placed similar fees on Chinese-bound vessels and now China is doing th4 same.”

Who This Hits: Ships and Investors with US Ties

Jayendu Krishna, director at Drewry Shipping Consultants, said bluntly that the devil is in the details – if a vessel financed by a US company, listed on a US exchange or chartered by a US entity is deemed US-owned, the measure could have a significant impact.

Kun Cao, vice president of Reddal, told the Associated Press that China’s countermeasure is “not just a symbolic move” – the rule specifically targets any vessel with substantial ties to the US, whether in ownership, operation, flag or construction, and fees will ramp up with tonnage – “real bite is on US-owned and operated vessels”.

Bloomberg also noted that although many of the world’s largest tanker operators are not headquartered in the US, several are listed there and have major US shareholders.

Omar Nokta, an analyst at Jefferies Group, said the impact of China’s new fee should not be underestimated – it will affect listed companies, especially those with more than 25% of shares held by US-based investment funds.

Meanwhile, US shipping insiders say the American port fee announcement is still a “murky mess” with unclear rules and scope, leaving the industry confused.

Recommended Articles