Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

The "Subversion Case" Fall Guy: A Cautionary Tale of Misguided Loyalty

Blog

The "Subversion Case" Fall Guy: A Cautionary Tale of Misguided Loyalty
Blog

Blog

The "Subversion Case" Fall Guy: A Cautionary Tale of Misguided Loyalty

2025-10-31 22:38 Last Updated At:22:38

In the movie “Infernal Affairs”, a drug lord famously says, "A general's success is built on ten thousand bleached bones." In the real world, the instigators of the Hong Kong unrest staged their grand "Revolution of Our Times," and predictably, it was the masses of naive foot soldiers who foolishly paid the ultimate price—ending up with broken families and ruined lives.

Andrew Chiu Ka-yin, involved in the "35+ subversion case"  and had been imprisoned for over four years, made headlines with his early release on Tuesday. But his co-defendant, Tsui Chi-kin, released a day earlier, quietly left prison on crutches. Apart from a handful of sympathetic "yellow media" outlets, hardly anyone noticed. No family came to pick him up—a truly desolate scene.

The Fall Guy: Tsui Chi-kin's lonely release after four years—a cautionary tale of being a pawn in someone else's game.

The Fall Guy: Tsui Chi-kin's lonely release after four years—a cautionary tale of being a pawn in someone else's game.

A look at Tsui’s background shows he was always a minor player in the so-called "resistance." Yet, he blindly charged ahead with the crowd, foolishly believing Benny Tai's assertion that the primary election was legal.

In 2020, he ran as a candidate but lost with a low vote count. Although relegated to a "Plan B" backup role, he was still swept up in the mass arrests, sentenced to over four years in prison. During this time, his wife divorced him, his father passed away, and he developed a chronic illness. His "revolutionary dream" shattered, leaving him with nothing.

The slippery slope of radicalization

Tsui Chi-kin's experience is the classic tragedy of a misguided individual. He was originally a middle-aged man running a small business. In 2014, infected by the radical ideology of the Occupy Central movement, he joined the "Umbrella Parents" organization. From then on, it was like joining a cult—he became increasingly fanatical, evolving into an active participant.

He became addicted to the game of radical politics. In 2015, pushed by behind-the-scenes manipulators, he ran in the District Council election, submitting his application just one day before the deadline.

The radical social atmosphere at the time was intense. Astonishingly, this political novice defeated a star DAB member, Chung Shu-kun, who had been a councilor for 24 years, by a mere 163 votes, causing quite a stir. From that point, he was immersed in the movement and found it difficult to extricate himself.

When the anti-extradition unrest erupted in 2019, he dove in even deeper. He was once arrested for helping black-clad rioters escape and was also involved in the July 1 rally, charged with inciting an illegal assembly.

Despite his active involvement, he remained a minor player. Within the pan-democratic and localist camps, he had neither fame nor status. In the eyes of other radical stars, this unremarkable "middle-aged man" was always on the sidelines.

Nevertheless, he devotedly followed the crowd and was thoroughly brainwashed by "law professor" Benny Tai, firmly believing the primary election was not illegal, so he participated without caution. However, he had little personal appeal and stood no chance against other "star" candidates. In the July 2020 vote, he ranked only fifth and was eliminated. But according to Tai's plan, he could still serve as a "Plan B" backup—if other candidates were later disqualified from the LegCo election, he would take their place.

He probably never imagined that even as a backup, uninvolved in the final race, he would be arrested when the police National Security Department launched mass arrests in 2021, rounding up all 55 people who participated in the primary. He was prosecuted and eventually convicted. He originally faced seven years in prison, but his sentence was reduced after pleading guilty. The judge also considered that he had been misled into believing the primary was legal, sentencing him to four years and two months. He was released this past Monday.

Picking up the pieces

While Tsui was in custody, his father died, his wife divorced him, and he developed a chronic illness—an extremely rough ordeal. Before his release on Monday, he required hospital treatment, so release procedures were handled there. When he left, most media didn't cover it, and no friends or family came to pick him up. He went home alone.

The above story is indeed a tragedy of a misled individual. But these are the consequences of his own actions, with no one else to blame. He was simply too susceptible to the instigators of unrest, ultimately leading to a tragic end. Others should take this as a stark warning.

In the "35+ subversion case," eight convicts will have served their time and be released next year, including Democratic Party heavyweights Wu Chi-wai and Andrew Wan Siu-kin, as well as Civic Party heavyweight Alvin Yeung Ngok-kiu. The first two will be released in June and July respectively. It's said they have seen through the illusions of politics and will leave the contentious arena, likely emigrating to start anew.

Democratic Party heavyweights Wu Chi-wai and others due for release next year face a reckoning with their past.

Democratic Party heavyweights Wu Chi-wai and others due for release next year face a reckoning with their past.

They made one wrong move and fell to their current state. When they lie awake at night in the future, they should deeply reflect on the wrong path they took.




What Say You?

** 博客文章文責自負,不代表本公司立場 **

Chiu Ka-yin isn’t holding back anymore. Convicted in the “35+ subversion case,” he was staring down a heavy 15-year sentence. But Chiu flipped the script—pleaded guilty, helped the prosecution, and owned up to being misled by Benny Tai. All these resulted in a jail time of just seven years. Earlier this week, he was granted an early release, an unprecedented move for any national security inmate. This sharp turn signals a man who's not just repentant, but fundamentally changed.

Chiu busts Tai’s “chief” act—shows the real mastermind behind mutual destruction.

Chiu busts Tai’s “chief” act—shows the real mastermind behind mutual destruction.

When the courtroom lights were on, Chiu didn’t mince words—he laid bare Benny Tai’s audacious grab for power, blasting Tai for unilaterally launching the so-called “mutual destruction battle” with Beijing. It was raw, it was public, and it exposed a simple truth: Tai always wanted to be the pan-democratic camp’s sole shot-caller, dragging everyone else toward the edge.

Benny Tai’s Playbook Gets the Spotlight

The records tell a revealing story. Prosecutors dragged out Tai’s notorious April 2020 “Hong Kong’s Mutual Destruction Showdown” article(《香港攬炒大對決》), where he pushes the idea: the democracy camp should use “mutual destruction” to squeeze the Communist Party of China and Hong Kong SAR into surrendering on the five so-called “anti-extradition” demands.

The script is clear: if the Legislative Council falls, if the budget collapses and the government grinds to a halt, then Beijing is forced to declare a state of emergency. That wasn’t some wild internet rumor—it’s straight from Tai’s pen.

Chiu didn’t hide his anger. Seeing Tai’s article for the first time in court, he nearly exploded. Phrases like “the democratic camp is now in full swing,” “they’ll reject the budget next year,” and “use mutual destruction to force Beijing”—all tossed out without any real consensus. Here was Tai, posturing as the king of Hong Kong’s democratic camp, declaring what everyone would do. Chiu couldn’t believe it, and right then, the mask slipped.

The democratic camp’s real mission, as Chiu saw it, was simple: win a majority in LegCo, push pro-people, pro-Hong Kong policies, and pressure the government for the five demands. Mutual destruction wasn’t even in the plan. Tai, for Chiu, was twisting the whole primary into a reckless confrontation with Beijing—a dangerous solo act lacking basic responsibility.

He looks back and says if he and the members of Power for Democracy had really scrutinized Tai’s writings, they’d have never agreed to run that primary.

Dragged Down the Wrong Road

Chiu’s testimony cuts deep, outing Tai’s true game:

1.Crown himself as pan-dem leader, wanting to order everyone around.

2.Use a legislative majority to pick a fight with Beijing.

3.Sell the primary as legal, misleading everyone down a road to disaster.

Chiu and his fellow pan-democrats never wanted this. But Tai, the so-called “mutual destruction mastermind,” led them straight into chaos. No wonder Chiu’s fury boiled over, followed by a reckoning. By stepping up as a star witness, he showed he knew just how badly he’d been played.

Seeing Tai’s showdown plot in court, Chiu erupted—then saw the truth and repented.

Seeing Tai’s showdown plot in court, Chiu erupted—then saw the truth and repented.

Not Alone in Regret

Chiu isn’t the only one waking up. Au Nok-hin also had that sinking feeling of being duped, volunteering to testify before the court ever convened—his testimony helped seal Tai’s fate. Even Civic Party’s Alvin Yeung Ngok-kiu, Jeremy Tam Man-ho, and Kwok Ka-ki offered to flip as prosecution witnesses, although their offers weren’t taken.

Here’s the twist that sticks: When Chiu finally saw through the “who’s real, who’s fake” haze, he realized people like Benny Tai aren’t freedom fighters—they’re the real culprits, harming Hong Kong and everyone in it.

Recommended Articles