Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

The "Subversion Case" Fall Guy: A Cautionary Tale of Misguided Loyalty

Blog

The "Subversion Case" Fall Guy: A Cautionary Tale of Misguided Loyalty
Blog

Blog

The "Subversion Case" Fall Guy: A Cautionary Tale of Misguided Loyalty

2025-10-31 22:38 Last Updated At:22:38

In the movie “Infernal Affairs”, a drug lord famously says, "A general's success is built on ten thousand bleached bones." In the real world, the instigators of the Hong Kong unrest staged their grand "Revolution of Our Times," and predictably, it was the masses of naive foot soldiers who foolishly paid the ultimate price—ending up with broken families and ruined lives.

Andrew Chiu Ka-yin, involved in the "35+ subversion case"  and had been imprisoned for over four years, made headlines with his early release on Tuesday. But his co-defendant, Tsui Chi-kin, released a day earlier, quietly left prison on crutches. Apart from a handful of sympathetic "yellow media" outlets, hardly anyone noticed. No family came to pick him up—a truly desolate scene.

The Fall Guy: Tsui Chi-kin's lonely release after four years—a cautionary tale of being a pawn in someone else's game.

The Fall Guy: Tsui Chi-kin's lonely release after four years—a cautionary tale of being a pawn in someone else's game.

A look at Tsui’s background shows he was always a minor player in the so-called "resistance." Yet, he blindly charged ahead with the crowd, foolishly believing Benny Tai's assertion that the primary election was legal.

In 2020, he ran as a candidate but lost with a low vote count. Although relegated to a "Plan B" backup role, he was still swept up in the mass arrests, sentenced to over four years in prison. During this time, his wife divorced him, his father passed away, and he developed a chronic illness. His "revolutionary dream" shattered, leaving him with nothing.

The slippery slope of radicalization

Tsui Chi-kin's experience is the classic tragedy of a misguided individual. He was originally a middle-aged man running a small business. In 2014, infected by the radical ideology of the Occupy Central movement, he joined the "Umbrella Parents" organization. From then on, it was like joining a cult—he became increasingly fanatical, evolving into an active participant.

He became addicted to the game of radical politics. In 2015, pushed by behind-the-scenes manipulators, he ran in the District Council election, submitting his application just one day before the deadline.

The radical social atmosphere at the time was intense. Astonishingly, this political novice defeated a star DAB member, Chung Shu-kun, who had been a councilor for 24 years, by a mere 163 votes, causing quite a stir. From that point, he was immersed in the movement and found it difficult to extricate himself.

When the anti-extradition unrest erupted in 2019, he dove in even deeper. He was once arrested for helping black-clad rioters escape and was also involved in the July 1 rally, charged with inciting an illegal assembly.

Despite his active involvement, he remained a minor player. Within the pan-democratic and localist camps, he had neither fame nor status. In the eyes of other radical stars, this unremarkable "middle-aged man" was always on the sidelines.

Nevertheless, he devotedly followed the crowd and was thoroughly brainwashed by "law professor" Benny Tai, firmly believing the primary election was not illegal, so he participated without caution. However, he had little personal appeal and stood no chance against other "star" candidates. In the July 2020 vote, he ranked only fifth and was eliminated. But according to Tai's plan, he could still serve as a "Plan B" backup—if other candidates were later disqualified from the LegCo election, he would take their place.

He probably never imagined that even as a backup, uninvolved in the final race, he would be arrested when the police National Security Department launched mass arrests in 2021, rounding up all 55 people who participated in the primary. He was prosecuted and eventually convicted. He originally faced seven years in prison, but his sentence was reduced after pleading guilty. The judge also considered that he had been misled into believing the primary was legal, sentencing him to four years and two months. He was released this past Monday.

Picking up the pieces

While Tsui was in custody, his father died, his wife divorced him, and he developed a chronic illness—an extremely rough ordeal. Before his release on Monday, he required hospital treatment, so release procedures were handled there. When he left, most media didn't cover it, and no friends or family came to pick him up. He went home alone.

The above story is indeed a tragedy of a misled individual. But these are the consequences of his own actions, with no one else to blame. He was simply too susceptible to the instigators of unrest, ultimately leading to a tragic end. Others should take this as a stark warning.

In the "35+ subversion case," eight convicts will have served their time and be released next year, including Democratic Party heavyweights Wu Chi-wai and Andrew Wan Siu-kin, as well as Civic Party heavyweight Alvin Yeung Ngok-kiu. The first two will be released in June and July respectively. It's said they have seen through the illusions of politics and will leave the contentious arena, likely emigrating to start anew.

Democratic Party heavyweights Wu Chi-wai and others due for release next year face a reckoning with their past.

Democratic Party heavyweights Wu Chi-wai and others due for release next year face a reckoning with their past.

They made one wrong move and fell to their current state. When they lie awake at night in the future, they should deeply reflect on the wrong path they took.




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Grief remains raw a week after the "once‑in‑a‑century" Wang Fuk Court inferno. But while locals pray, overseas agitators plot. They are cynically hijacking the tragedy to rebrand their stalled anti-embassy campaign as a "mourning event."

Think of it as a "triplet" strategy: by bundling the vigil with BNO residency demands, these agitators aim to pump up turnout and force London’s hand. It is a desperate bid to build clout that risks channeling discontent right back to Hong Kong—and authorities need to be watching.

Calculated Pivot: UK agitators hijack the fire tragedy to pump life into their flagging anti-embassy march.

Calculated Pivot: UK agitators hijack the fire tragedy to pump life into their flagging anti-embassy march.

Opportunists Hijack Tragedy for Politics

Make no mistake: the overseas "yellow camp" is going all-out. Major player Hong Kong Watch has issued marching orders to so-called "Hong Kong Community Centres" in Los Angeles, Toronto, and Berlin. Don't let the neutral "community center" branding fool you. These are operational bases for hardline opposition supporters.

Saturday's Toronto event exposes the political underbelly. Alongside the usual protest regulars, you have heavy hitters like Hong Kong Watch Canada chair Aileen Calverley. The theme—"pursuing accountability"—screams politics, not prayer. Expect to see former entertainer Joseph Tay, who fled to Canada in 2020 and now sits on a National Security wanted list.

But the main event is in Britain. The group "Hongkongers in Britain" is staging a massive "memorial" in London, expecting hundreds. The ringleader is Simon Cheng, a former employee of the British consulate with a murky past who secured swift asylum in 2020. Now a fugitive on the police wanted list, he is mixing mourning with his separatist agenda.

Fugitive on the Attack: Simon Cheng weaponizes tomorrow's memorial to strike at the Hong Kong government.

Fugitive on the Attack: Simon Cheng weaponizes tomorrow's memorial to strike at the Hong Kong government.

Friday is just the warm-up act. The real play comes Saturday, when various BNO holder groups converge for a "large march." The mourning angle? That was a last-minute add-on. Their original, stated goals were purely political: protecting BNO settlement perks and killing China’s "super embassy" plan in London.

Shifting goalposts is their only constant. Previous marches relied on a motley crew of anti-China politicians and separatists to sour UK-China relations. But here is the cold reality: British intelligence greenlit the embassy, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer looks ready to approve it. With the opposition campaign hitting a dead end, turnout is nose-diving.

To arrest the decline, organizers are tapping into anxiety among Hong Kong BNO holders about tougher residency rules. By adding a "no change to settlement conditions" demand, they hope to drag more bodies into the street and pad their shrinking numbers.

Fading Relevance Desperate for Numbers

Then came the fire. It was a "once-in-a-century" disaster, and these groups wasted no time weaponizing the grief. By co-opting the tragedy, they aim to lure in regular Hong Kong people who just want to mourn, oblivious to the hardline agenda. It makes their "triplet" protest look far bigger than it actually is.

The playbook is predictable. Once the crowd gathers to mourn, organizers will pour political fuel on the fire, steering the anger toward the HKSAR Government. The goal is simple: export this manufactured outrage back to Hong Kong, triggering "brothers-in-arms" to reignite the ashes of the 2019 turmoil.

This isn't the first time they have built a platform on tragedy. It won't be the last. Authorities need to keep their eyes wide open.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles