Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

The UK’s BNO ‘Squid Game’: How London is ruthlessly filtering ‘Premium’ Hong Kong migrants

Blog

The UK’s BNO ‘Squid Game’: How London is ruthlessly filtering ‘Premium’ Hong Kong migrants
Blog

Blog

The UK’s BNO ‘Squid Game’: How London is ruthlessly filtering ‘Premium’ Hong Kong migrants

2025-11-24 11:42 Last Updated At:11:42

The gamble is over for Hong Kong BNO holders, and the results are finally in. London has decided to stick with the "5+1" scheme—five years for permanent residency application, another year for citizenship. On paper, it looks like a win compared to the decade-long wait others endure. But don't pop the champagne yet; the devil is firmly in the details. The bar for residency has been raised significantly, targeting English proficiency, income, and "social contribution." The message from my contacts on the ground is clear: "low-end" migrants are going to struggle. And for the "brothers"—those protesters who fled in a panic with criminal records, they're out of the game. It’s obvious what’s happening here: Britain is cherry-picking "premium" migrants to plug its own brain drain while showing the door to those with no economic value.

Britain’s new game: Raise the BNO bar, filter for “star performers,” all to plug UK’s brain drain.

Britain’s new game: Raise the BNO bar, filter for “star performers,” all to plug UK’s brain drain.

While the UK is technically keeping the special five-year timeline, it comes with strings attached—ropes, actually. First, you need a spotless record: no crimes, no pending cases, and absolutely no debts to the taxman or the NHS. Second, your English needs to be B2 level, effectively A-Level standard. Third, you need a consistent tax record with an annual income over £12,570. It’s not just about showing up anymore; it’s about paying up.

It’s the language requirement where things really get spicy. Previously, BNO holders only needed B1 level English—roughly secondary school standard—which most could scrape by with. But raising the bar to B2? That’s tertiary education level. My friends in the UK note that this is a massive jump. Frankly, if you tested actual British citizens on this standard, a good chunk of them would likely fail their own test.

The anxiety is palpable. Just recently, a "post-90s" migrant vented on Facebook that despite three years in the UK, their English still hasn't hit the B1 mark. The fear is real: failing the English hurdle means failing the permanent residency application and getting "kicked back to Hong Kong."

The Great British Filter

Documents circulating among friends show there are no exceptions. BNO visa holders, their dependents, and even the elderly must hit that B2 target. If you have lower educational qualifications or struggle with the language, your path to citizenship ends here. You won't get permanent status. Period.

Then there’s the money. While the final fine print on income is still pending, the writing is on the wall: you need to average over £12,570 a year, stay employed, and keep paying Income Tax. If you don’t have a proper job, if your income fluctuates, or if you’re just drifting along like an "idle cloud" without purpose, you are definitely out of the game.

London’s BNO reality check: Strict new English and income rules are a calculated purge to filter out ‘low value’ Hong Kongers.

London’s BNO reality check: Strict new English and income rules are a calculated purge to filter out ‘low value’ Hong Kongers.

This is going to hit hard because this situation is all too common among the BNO community. Many are stuck in low-paying part-time gigs because their qualifications aren't recognized, or they’re simply unemployed. Others, unable to adapt to the grim reality of British life, have just decided to "lie flat." The government’s verdict on them will be brutal: "no social contribution." Settlement denied.

My contacts analyze the logic behind maintaining the "5+1" scheme, and it boils down to cold, hard calculation. First, it aligns with the UK’s drastic shift in immigration policy: only those with "economic value" get to stay. The "parasites" living off welfare are being purged. Second, it’s about poaching "premium" Hong Kong people to fill the massive labor gaps caused by Britain’s own brain drain. Let’s be clear: this "preferential treatment" has zero to do with moral obligation. It is purely a transactional move to secure high-quality human capital.

A Desperate Grab for Talent

To prove the point, news broke yesterday that the government has set up an "express lane" for high-earning foreign expatriates. They can apply for permanent residence after just three years—beating the BNO timeline. The goal is obvious: replenish the local talent pool as fast as humanly possible.

The warning sirens are blaring. Official statistics show a record 257,000 British citizens packed their bags last year to escape punishing taxes and seek a better life elsewhere. Prime Minister Keir Starmer knows this brain drain is wrecking the economy. His solution? "Keep" the high-value Hong Kong BNO holders to stop the bleeding. But for those who aren’t "premium"—including the "brothers" who rioted and ran? They aren't what he wants. They are destined for the scrap heap.

However, there is one possibility London’s calculators missed. Even the "premium" BNO holders who jump through all these hoops might just grab their permanent residency and head straight back to Hong Kong to actually make money. After all, salaries in Hong Kong are higher, and the opportunities are better. When they decide to "flow out" of the UK, there is absolutely nothing the British government can do to stop them.

Lai Ting-yiu




What Say You?

** The blog article is the sole responsibility of the author and does not represent the position of our company. **

Jimmy Lai's marathon trial for colluding with foreign forces wraps up after 156 days, with the verdict dropping next Monday. Friends tracking the case have eyes glued on U.S. President Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, but as the moment nears, both stay ice-cold—muttering a few throwaway lines to fulfill obligations, clearly dodging any real fireworks that could sour ties with China. Jimmy's daughter, Lai Chai, seems to get the memo; her recent Washington Post letter skips any hard push for Trump to "rescue Dad." Dreamers still peddle fairy tales, though—like claims Trump would whip out the "Jimmy Lai card" in U.S.-China talks. Pure fantasy, as facts now confirm 100%.

Trump and Starmer shrug off "save Lai"—perfunctory mutters, all show, no spine, with trade deals calling the shots.

Trump and Starmer shrug off "save Lai"—perfunctory mutters, all show, no spine, with trade deals calling the shots.

Peel back Trump's moves on Lai lately, and the truth jumps out: real rescue mission or mere box-ticking? Before his late-October Busan sit-down with Chairman Xi, Lai’s son Lai Chong-en clung to hopes the case would hit the agenda. Post-meeting, the U.S. media briefing was silence on Lai—whether Trump even whispered the name stays locked tight.

Lukewarm Whispers, No Fireworks

Days later, some mystery leaker (identity still foggy) tips Reuters: Trump name-dropped Lai for under five minutes, zero substance. Weird twist—the White House stonewalls, never confirming a word. Smart money says Trump tossed in a casual nod to honor old pledges without torpedoing the talks, then shelved it for good.

Trump ditching this chip? Easy math. Priority one: safeguard the hard-fought U.S.-China trade deal—steer clear of distractions. Priority two: Lai's got zero bargaining juice left in Trump's dealmaker world; why gamble the big win for a lightweight?

Flash back to Trump's first-term endgame—he never clutched Lai close. When Lai was arrested in August 2020, Trump shrugs: "He's a good man. I don't know him, but I've heard he's a good man... I wish him well." Election loss hits, and poof—Lai vanishes from his lips. The real Lai cheerleaders were VP Pence and Secretary Pompeo, who even met him. But Trump's back in power this year, boots those guys to the curb as foes—Lai, their pet project, gets zilch.

During Lai's trial, family begs Trump and Starmer for help—met with cold showers every time, total waste.

During Lai's trial, family begs Trump and Starmer for help—met with cold showers every time, total waste.

Trump's chill on "save Lai" finds a wimpier twin in Starmer. March this year, Lai Chong-en jets to London, begs a huddle to pressure China—slammed with ice: door barred, a gate security grunt was sent to receive his petition letter.

Mid-September, one last Hail Mary: another letter to Starmer—again, nothing happens. Downgrades to Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper? More lemons. Starmer's foreign policy speech? Box-ticking Lai nod, buried in human rights gripes, China sanctions on UK MPs, campus threats—pure "mention and move on."

Starmer eyes a China trip next year, hungry for trade juice to pump Britain's wheezing economy—no way he lets Lai derail that gravy train.

Trump, Starmer—profit trumps all. Jimmy Lai card? More pain than gain, and even if played, it's showbiz with zero sway on his fate.

Lai Ting-yiu

Recommended Articles